2005 NCAA Women's Division II pr

2005 NCAA Women's Division II 09 23 22 17:23 PDT

Switch to RPI Method

Power Rating (PR) Explanation	Strength Of Schedule (SOS) Explanation	Quality Wins Factor(QWF) Explanation	Championship Probability Explanation
Power Ratings (PR) Print Version	Strength Of Schedule (SOS) Print Version	Quality Win Factor (QWF) Print Version	Champ & Selection Print Version

Rank	Team	PR	SOS	QWF	Champion %
1	Stonehill ( 21 - 0 )	1	20	1	68 . 0 %
2	West Chester ( 16 - 2 )	2	15	2	21 . 0 %
3	Adelphi ( 14 - 2 )	3	25	3	5 . 0 %
4	C.W. Post ( 13 - 3 )	4	28	4	5 . 0 %
5	Bloomsburg ( 12 - 6 )	8	13	6	1 . 0 %
6	American International ( 4 - 8 )	26	32	28	0 . 10 %
7	Assumption ( 7 - 9 )	19	12	24	0 . 10 %
8	Bentley ( 6 - 8 )	21	19	26	0 . 10 %
9	Bryant ( 12 - 5 )	13	23	13	0 . 10 %
10	East Stroudsburg ( 7 - 9 )	17	6	15	0 . 10 %
11	Franklin Pierce ( 0 - 16 )	33	31	35	0 . 10 %
12	Gannon ( 10 - 4 )	5	7	7	0 . 10 %
13	Indiana (PA) ( 2 - 14 )	22	17	32	0 . 10 %
14	Lees-McRae ( 3 - 13 )	30	4	27	0 . 10 %
15	Limestone ( 10 - 6 )	12	8	9	0 . 10 %
16	Lock Haven ( 13 - 5 )	6	14	5	0 . 10 %
17	Mercyhurst ( 6 - 9 )	15	5	23	0 . 10 %
18	Merrimack ( 12 - 3 )	7	24	8	0 . 10 %
19	Millersville ( 5 - 9 )	14	10	20	0 . 10 %
20	New Haven ( 7 - 8 )	18	9	18	0 . 10 %
21	Notre Dame (OH) ( 1 - 10 )	34	2	21	0 . 10 %
22	Pfeiffer ( 11 - 4 )	10	3	10	0 . 10 %
23	Philadelphia ( 10 - 6 )	9	21	11	0 . 10 %
24	Queens ( 11 - 6 )	11	11	12	0 . 10 %
25	Regis (CO) ( 1 - 6 )	20	1	16	0 . 10 %
26	S. New Hampshire ( 6 - 8 )	28	29	25	0 . 10 %
27	Saint Anselm ( 5 - 10 )	24	27	29	0 . 10 %
28	Saint Michael's ( 6 - 7 )	16	26	22	0 . 10 %
29	Saint Vincent ( 4 - 8 )	25	30	19	0 . 10 %
30	Seton Hill ( 3 - 4 )	29	35	17	0 . 10 %
31	Shippensburg ( 1 - 15 )	23	18	33	0 . 10 %
32	Southern Connecticut ( 3 - 10 )	31	34	34	0 . 10 %
33	St. Andrews ( 2 - 12 )	35	16	31	0 . 10 %
34	St. Thomas Aquinas ( 2 - 12 )	32	33	30	0 . 10 %
35	Wilmington ( 9 - 3 )	27	22	14	0 . 10 %