Explanation Of Quality Win Factor (QWF)

Teams are awarded certain quality points for defeating a team ranked 1-5, 6-10, 11-20, and 21-59. The higher the ranking (e.g., 1-5), the more points they receive. Also, teams are awarded negative points if they lose games in which the reverse applies. That is, losing to a lower-ranked team results in a loss of points. Here's the scheme:

  Defeating a 1-5 ranked team yields 25 points
  Defeating a 6-10 ranked team yields 20 points
  Defeating an 11-20 ranked team yields 15 points
  Defeating a team ranked > 20 yield 5 points

  Losing to a 1-5 ranked team costs 5 points
  Losing to a 6-10 ranked team costs 15 points
  Losing to an 11-20 ranked team costs 20 points
  Losing to a team ranked > 20 costs 25 points

So how do we determine which teams are in which groups (1-5,6-10,etc.), we employ two alternatives: we use the RPI ranking from the RPI method, or the power ranking from he power rating method. Using this system and looking at the example below, Syracuse's points would be computed as follows:

 

QWF Points = (4*25 - 1*5) + (1*20 - 1*15) + (4*15 - 0*20) + (7*5 - 0*25) = 195 

                         1-5   6-10 11-20 21-59
No Team             Pts  W  L  W  L  W  L  W  L

1 Syracuse          195  4  1  1  1  4  0  7  0
2 Virginia          175  4  3  1  0  2  0  8  0
3 Duke              160  2  2  4  0  4  1  5  1
4 Cornell           115  2  3  3  0  0  1  8  0
5 Notre Dame        115  0  0  2  0  3  1 10  0
6 Princeton         110  2  2  0  1  3  0  8  0
7 North Carolina     80  1  4  1  1  4  1  6  0
8 Johns Hopkins      75  0  3  2  2  4  0  4  0
9 Hofstra            55  0  2  1  1  3  1  7  0
10 Brown             30  1  1  0  2  1  0 10  1
11 Navy              30  0  2  0  1  4  2  7  0
12 UMBC              20  0  1  0  2  2  0 10  1
13 Loyola            15  0  3  0  1  2  1  7  0
14 Maryland          10  1  3  2  1  0  3  7  0
15 Harvard          -20  1  1  0  1  0  3  7  0
16 Penn State       -25  0  0  0  2  3  1  6  2
17 Colgate          -30  0  2  0  1  1  3  8  0
18 Massachusetts    -30  0  1  1  2  1  2  7  1
19 Bryant           -35  0  1  0  1  0  2 10  1
20 Villanova        -35  0  1  1  2  0  1 10  2

The more difficult the competition the greater the reward for winning and likewise a loss to a weaker team results in a greater penalty than losing to a stronger team. We present both results for comparison below on the printable link.