Rutgers Power Rating = 94.12
Date H/A Opponent W L Conference PR Score
131 N Jacksonville 10 5 ASUN 95.875 11 10 207 H Army West Point 13 3 Patriot 98.039 9 11 214 A Stony Brook 10 5 CAA 92.005 14 11 221 H Villanova 6 8 Big East 93.050 8 7 224 H LIU 11 4 NEC 89.392 13 5 228 H Hofstra 4 10 CAA 89.226 11 8 307 A Princeton 13 2 Ivy 99.414 9 20 310 A St Johns (NY) 2 12 Big East 87.860 19 4 314 H Bellarmine 5 11 ASUN 88.872 21 8 321 H Ohio State 10 4 B1G 95.646 5 6 329 H Johns Hopkins 9 5 B1G 96.445 9 8 405 A Michigan 5 9 B1G 94.465 10 13 411 A Maryland 7 6 B1G 97.551 2 12 417 H Penn State 9 5 B1G 99.231 8 16 425 A Maryland 7 6 B1G 97.551 10 13
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:PairWisePlus = 54 h2h = 8; coo = 28; pow = 18
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
If two teams have uneven common opponent records, it is because of two reasons,
(1) One team played the opponent twice or (2), the other team has yet to play the common opponent.
As an example, team A beat team C and is 1-0. Team B will eventually play team C and is 0-0.
Team A gets the common opponent win. however the common opponent comparison is re-evaluated
after team B plays team C.
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rutgers | Rutgers   2.- 1. vs 1.- 2. |   | ||
| Rutgers | tied -  0.- 0. | Rutgers | ||
| Army West Point | Army West Point |   |   | |
| Rutgers | Rutgers |   |   | |
| Rutgers | Rutgers   1.- 0. vs 0.- 1. |   | ||
| Boston University | Boston University   1.- 0. vs 0.- 1. |   | ||
| Rutgers | tied -  1.- 1. | Rutgers | ||
| Rutgers | tied -  1.- 0. | Rutgers | ||
| Rutgers | tied -  0.- 1. | Rutgers | ||
| Rutgers | tied -  0.- 0. | Rutgers | ||
| Rutgers | Rutgers   2.- 1. vs 0.- 3. |   | ||
| Rutgers | tied -  0.- 2. | Rutgers | ||
| Cornell | Cornell   0.- 1. vs 0.- 2. |   | ||
| Rutgers | tied -  0.- 1. | Rutgers | ||
| Rutgers | Rutgers   2.- 1. vs 1.- 2. |   | ||
| Denver | tied -  2.- 2. | Denver | ||
| Rutgers | Rutgers   3.- 2. vs 0.- 5. |   | ||
| Rutgers | Rutgers   3.- 0. vs 1.- 1. |   | ||
| Duke | tied -  2.- 0. | Duke | ||
| Rutgers | Rutgers   2.- 0. vs 0.- 2. |   | ||
| Georgetown | tied -  2.- 1. | Georgetown | ||
| Rutgers | Rutgers   2.- 0. vs 0.- 2. |   | ||
| Harvard | Harvard   1.- 1. vs 0.- 2. |   | ||
| Rutgers | Rutgers   1.- 1. vs 0.- 2. |   | ||
| Rutgers | tied -  0.- 0. | Rutgers | ||
| Rutgers | Rutgers |   |   | |
| Rutgers | tied -  1.- 1. | Rutgers | ||
| Rutgers | Rutgers   3.- 0. vs 0.- 3. |   | ||
| Rutgers | Rutgers |   |   | |
| Rutgers | Rutgers |   |   | |
| Lafayette | Lafayette   2.- 0. vs 1.- 1. |   | ||
| Rutgers | Rutgers   2.- 0. vs 0.- 2. |   | ||
| Lehigh | Lehigh   2.- 2. vs 1.- 3. |   | ||
| Rutgers | Rutgers |   |   | |
| Rutgers | Rutgers   1.- 2. vs 0.- 3. |   | ||
| Rutgers | Rutgers   1.- 0. vs 0.- 1. |   | ||
| Rutgers | Rutgers   1.- 0. vs 0.- 1. |   | ||
| Rutgers | Rutgers   3.- 1. vs 2.- 2. |   | ||
| Maryland | Maryland |   |   | |
| Rutgers | tied -  0.- 1. | Rutgers | ||
| Rutgers | tied -  0.- 0. | Rutgers | ||
| Rutgers | Rutgers   3.- 1. vs 2.- 2. |   | ||
| Rutgers | Rutgers   2.- 0. vs 0.- 2. |   | ||
| Rutgers | tied -  0.- 0. | Rutgers | ||
| Michigan | Michigan |   |   | |
| Rutgers | Rutgers   3.- 0. vs 1.- 2. |   | ||
| Rutgers | Rutgers   1.- 0. vs 0.- 1. |   | ||
| Rutgers | tied -  2.- 2. | Rutgers | ||
| Rutgers | Rutgers   2.- 0. vs 1.- 1. |   | ||
| North Carolina | North Carolina   4.- 1. vs 2.- 3. |   | ||
| Notre Dame | Notre Dame   4.- 0. vs 1.- 3. |   | ||
| Ohio State | Ohio State |   |   | |
| Penn | tied -  1.- 1. | Penn | ||
| Penn State | Penn State |   |   | |
| Princeton | Princeton |   |   | |
| Rutgers | tied -  2.- 0. | Rutgers | ||
| Rutgers | Rutgers   3.- 0. vs 0.- 3. |   | ||
| Rutgers | Rutgers   1.- 0. vs 0.- 1. |   | ||
| Richmond | tied -  0.- 0. | Richmond | ||
| Rutgers | Rutgers   3.- 0. vs 2.- 1. |   | ||
| Rutgers | tied -  2.- 0. | Rutgers | ||
| Rutgers | tied -  1.- 0. | Rutgers | ||
| Rutgers | Rutgers   1.- 0. vs 0.- 1. |   | ||
| Rutgers | Rutgers |   |   | |
| St Josephs (PA) | tied -  1.- 0. | St Josephs (PA) | ||
| Rutgers | Rutgers |   |   | |
| Syracuse | Syracuse   2.- 1. vs 1.- 2. |   | ||
| Rutgers | Rutgers   4.- 0. vs 2.- 1. |   | ||
| Rutgers | Rutgers   1.- 0. vs 0.- 1. |   | ||
| Utah | tied -  2.- 0. | Utah | ||
| Rutgers | tied -  0.- 1. | Rutgers | ||
| Rutgers | Rutgers |   |   | |
| Rutgers | Rutgers   2.- 1. vs 1.- 2. |   | ||
| Rutgers | tied -  1.- 0. | Rutgers | ||
| Rutgers | Rutgers   1.- 0. vs 0.- 1. |   | ||
| Yale | tied -  1.- 3. | Yale |