Johns Hopkins Power Rating = 96.45
Date H/A Opponent W L Conference PR Score
202 H Robert Morris 14 3 NEC 91.485 17 2 210 H Towson 11 4 CAA 95.337 13 11 214 H Loyola 10 6 Patriot 94.320 13 7 220 A North Carolina 12 4 ACC 98.701 9 17 228 A Virginia 10 6 ACC 98.608 14 13 307 H Syracuse 11 5 ACC 98.643 8 12 314 H Navy 7 7 Patriot 93.989 14 10 321 H Michigan 5 9 B1G 94.465 14 8 329 A Rutgers 8 7 B1G 94.123 8 9 404 H Penn State 9 5 B1G 99.231 11 10 411 A Ohio State 10 4 B1G 95.646 6 7 418 H Maryland 7 6 B1G 97.551 9 8 430 N Michigan 5 9 B1G 94.465 14 12 502 N Penn State 9 5 B1G 99.231 8 16
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:PairWisePlus = 64 h2h = 7; coo = 33; pow = 24
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
If two teams have uneven common opponent records, it is because of two reasons,
(1) One team played the opponent twice or (2), the other team has yet to play the common opponent.
As an example, team A beat team C and is 1-0. Team B will eventually play team C and is 0-0.
Team A gets the common opponent win. however the common opponent comparison is re-evaluated
after team B plays team C.
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Johns Hopkins | tied -  0.- 2. | Johns Hopkins | ||
| Johns Hopkins | tied -  0.- 0. | Johns Hopkins | ||
| Army West Point | Army West Point   4.- 1. vs 3.- 2. |   | ||
| Johns Hopkins | Johns Hopkins   1.- 2. vs 0.- 3. |   | ||
| Johns Hopkins | tied -  0.- 0. | Johns Hopkins | ||
| Johns Hopkins | Johns Hopkins   2.- 1. vs 1.- 2. |   | ||
| Johns Hopkins | tied -  0.- 1. | Johns Hopkins | ||
| Johns Hopkins | tied -  0.- 0. | Johns Hopkins | ||
| Johns Hopkins | Johns Hopkins   3.- 0. vs 0.- 3. |   | ||
| Johns Hopkins | Johns Hopkins   1.- 0. vs 0.- 1. |   | ||
| Johns Hopkins | Johns Hopkins   1.- 1. vs 0.- 2. |   | ||
| Johns Hopkins | Johns Hopkins   3.- 1. vs 1.- 4. |   | ||
| Johns Hopkins | Johns Hopkins   0.- 0. vs 0.- 1. |   | ||
| Johns Hopkins | Johns Hopkins   1.- 0. vs 0.- 1. |   | ||
| Johns Hopkins | Johns Hopkins   1.- 0. vs 0.- 1. |   | ||
| Johns Hopkins | tied -  1.- 2. | Johns Hopkins | ||
| Johns Hopkins | Johns Hopkins   2.- 1. vs 0.- 3. |   | ||
| Johns Hopkins | Johns Hopkins   2.- 0. vs 0.- 2. |   | ||
| Duke | tied -  1.- 2. | Duke | ||
| Johns Hopkins | Johns Hopkins   1.- 0. vs 0.- 1. |   | ||
| Georgetown | tied -  1.- 2. | Georgetown | ||
| Johns Hopkins | Johns Hopkins   1.- 0. vs 0.- 1. |   | ||
| Harvard | Harvard   2.- 1. vs 1.- 2. |   | ||
| Johns Hopkins | Johns Hopkins   2.- 2. vs 0.- 4. |   | ||
| Johns Hopkins | Johns Hopkins   1.- 0. vs 0.- 1. |   | ||
| Johns Hopkins | Johns Hopkins   1.- 1. vs 0.- 2. |   | ||
| Johns Hopkins | Johns Hopkins   2.- 0. vs 0.- 2. |   | ||
| Johns Hopkins | Johns Hopkins   1.- 1. vs 0.- 2. |   | ||
| Johns Hopkins | Johns Hopkins   1.- 2. vs 0.- 3. |   | ||
| Johns Hopkins | Johns Hopkins   2.- 0. vs 0.- 2. |   | ||
| Johns Hopkins | Johns Hopkins   1.- 0. vs 0.- 1. |   | ||
| Johns Hopkins | tied -  3.- 0. | Johns Hopkins | ||
| Johns Hopkins | Johns Hopkins   1.- 1. vs 0.- 2. |   | ||
| Johns Hopkins | Johns Hopkins |   |   | |
| Johns Hopkins | tied -  0.- 0. | Johns Hopkins | ||
| Johns Hopkins | tied -  0.- 0. | Johns Hopkins | ||
| Johns Hopkins | Johns Hopkins   1.- 0. vs 0.- 1. |   | ||
| Johns Hopkins | Johns Hopkins |   |   | |
| Johns Hopkins | tied -  0.- 0. | Johns Hopkins | ||
| Johns Hopkins | tied -  0.- 0. | Johns Hopkins | ||
| Johns Hopkins | tied -  0.- 0. | Johns Hopkins | ||
| Johns Hopkins | Johns Hopkins   1.- 0. vs 0.- 1. |   | ||
| Johns Hopkins | tied -  0.- 0. | Johns Hopkins | ||
| Johns Hopkins | Johns Hopkins |   |   | |
| Johns Hopkins | Johns Hopkins   1.- 0. vs 0.- 1. |   | ||
| Johns Hopkins | tied -  0.- 0. | Johns Hopkins | ||
| Johns Hopkins | Johns Hopkins |   |   | |
| Johns Hopkins | tied -  0.- 0. | Johns Hopkins | ||
| North Carolina | North Carolina |   |   | |
| Notre Dame | Notre Dame   5.- 1. vs 3.- 3. |   | ||
| Ohio State | Ohio State |   |   | |
| Johns Hopkins | tied -  0.- 2. | Johns Hopkins | ||
| Penn State | tied -  3.- 3. | Penn State | ||
| Princeton | Princeton   4.- 1. vs 1.- 3. |   | ||
| Johns Hopkins | Johns Hopkins   1.- 0. vs 0.- 1. |   | ||
| Johns Hopkins | tied -  0.- 0. | Johns Hopkins | ||
| Johns Hopkins | tied -  0.- 0. | Johns Hopkins | ||
| Richmond | tied -  2.- 0. | Richmond | ||
| Johns Hopkins | Johns Hopkins |   |   | |
| Rutgers | Rutgers |   |   | |
| Johns Hopkins | tied -  0.- 0. | Johns Hopkins | ||
| Johns Hopkins | tied -  0.- 0. | Johns Hopkins | ||
| Johns Hopkins | tied -  1.- 0. | Johns Hopkins | ||
| Johns Hopkins | tied -  0.- 1. | Johns Hopkins | ||
| Johns Hopkins | tied -  1.- 1. | Johns Hopkins | ||
| Johns Hopkins | Johns Hopkins   2.- 1. vs 0.- 2. |   | ||
| Syracuse | Syracuse |   |   | |
| Johns Hopkins | Johns Hopkins |   |   | |
| Johns Hopkins | Johns Hopkins   2.- 0. vs 0.- 2. |   | ||
| Johns Hopkins | Johns Hopkins   1.- 0. vs 0.- 1. |   | ||
| Johns Hopkins | tied -  0.- 0. | Johns Hopkins | ||
| Johns Hopkins | Johns Hopkins   1.- 1. vs 1.- 2. |   | ||
| Johns Hopkins | Johns Hopkins |   |   | |
| Johns Hopkins | Johns Hopkins   2.- 0. vs 0.- 2. |   | ||
| Johns Hopkins | Johns Hopkins   1.- 0. vs 0.- 1. |   | ||
| Johns Hopkins | Johns Hopkins   0.- 0. vs 0.- 1. |   |