2008 girls Pennsylvania-CPLA pr

2008 girls Pennsylvania-CPLA 09 23 22 21:21 PDT

Switch to RPI Method

Power Rating (PR) Explanation	Strength Of Schedule (SOS) Explanation	Quality Wins Factor(QWF) Explanation	Championship Probability Explanation
Power Ratings(PR) Print Version	Strength Of Schedule (SOS) Print Version	Quality Win Factor (QWF) Print Version	Champ & Selection Print Version

Rank	Team	PR	SOS	QWF	Champion %
1	Mercersburg Academy ( 9 - 5 )	1	30	8	42 . 0 %
2	Hershey ( 19 - 0 )	2	28	1	26 . 0 %
3	Kennard-Dale ( 15 - 0 )	3	29	4	14 . 0 %
4	Cumberland Valley ( 13 - 6 )	4	11	7	10 . 0 %
5	Manheim Township ( 13 - 3 )	6	21	6	3 . 0 %
6	Hempfield, Landisville ( 13 - 6 )	8	8	5	2 . 0 %
7	Central York ( 8 - 2 )	12	31	10	1 . 0 %
8	Penn Manor ( 17 - 3 )	7	19	2	1 . 0 %
9	Warwick, PA ( 15 - 2 )	5	20	3	1 . 0 %
10	Carlisle ( 11 - 7 )	11	23	9	0 . 10 %
11	Central Dauphin ( 7 - 12 )	20	16	27	0 . 10 %
12	Central Dauphin East ( 8 - 11 )	30	24	24	0 . 10 %
13	Cedar Crest ( 1 - 12 )	33	5	34	0 . 10 %
14	Central Susquehanna ( 0 - 0 )	28	33	15	0 . 10 %
15	Cocalico ( 7 - 7 )	10	6	12	0 . 10 %
16	Conestoga Valley ( 9 - 10 )	9	7	14	0 . 10 %
17	Conrad Weiser ( 0 - 3 )	34	12	20	0 . 10 %
18	Dallastown ( 1 - 4 )	23	9	22	0 . 10 %
19	Ephrata ( 1 - 10 )	26	4	31	0 . 10 %
20	Lampeter-Strasburg ( 2 - 10 )	19	3	28	0 . 10 %
21	Lancaster CDS, PA ( 1 - 10 )	22	2	29	0 . 10 %
22	Lewisburg ( 3 - 6 )	29	32	26	0 . 10 %
23	Lower Dauphin ( 2 - 10 )	32	17	33	0 . 10 %
24	McCaskey ( 0 - 0 )	0	0	0	0 . 10 %
25	Midd-West ( 5 - 0 )	15	34	13	0 . 10 %
26	New Oxford ( 0 - 1 )	25	1	18	0 . 10 %
27	Northern York ( 0 - 0 )	0	0	0	0 . 10 %
28	Palmyra, PA ( 0 - 14 )	36	25	36	0 . 10 %
29	Red Lion ( 2 - 8 )	21	10	30	0 . 10 %
30	Spring Grove ( 2 - 9 )	24	15	32	0 . 10 %
31	Southwestern ( 9 - 5 )	13	18	11	0 . 10 %
32	State College Area ( 1 - 4 )	27	27	25	0 . 10 %
33	Susquehannock ( 3 - 5 )	14	14	23	0 . 10 %
34	Wilson, PA ( 1 - 3 )	31	22	21	0 . 10 %
35	York Catholic ( 0 - 9 )	35	13	35	0 . 10 %
36	York Suburban ( 5 - 4 )	18	26	19	0 . 10 %