2008 girls Pennsylvania-CPLA
CHAMPIONSHIP PROBABILITIES
PR = Power Ratings RPI = Ratings Percentage Index SOS = Strength of Schedule QWF = Quality Wins Factor SOS & QWF SOS & QWFbased on PR based on RPI Probabilities (%) Rnk Team Name Conference W L PR SOS QWF RPI SOS QWF Tot Champ %
1 Penn Manor 17 3 4 19 2 6 4 2 12 1.00 2 Hershey 19 0 1 28 1 2 10 1 13 26.00 3 Cumberland Valle 13 6 6 12 7 5 2 7 14 10.00 4 Kennard-Dale 15 0 2 29 4 1 11 3 15 14.00 5 Manheim Township 13 3 5 22 6 9 7 5 21 3.00 6 New Oxford 0 1 28 1 18 3 1 17 21 0.10 7 Warwick, PA 15 2 3 21 3 7 17 4 28 1.00 8 Carlisle 11 7 12 23 9 14 6 10 30 0.10 9 Mercersburg Acad 9 5 13 30 8 4 22 8 34 42.00 10 Southwestern 9 5 14 18 11 10 18 11 39 0.10 11 Cocalico 7 7 9 6 12 13 14 14 41 0.10 12 Conestoga Valley 9 10 11 7 14 15 8 19 42 0.10 13 Hempfield, Landi 13 6 7 8 5 8 28 6 42 2.00 14 Central York 8 2 8 31 10 11 26 9 46 1.00 15 Central Dauphin 7 12 17 13 27 17 3 27 47 0.10 16 Central Dauphin 8 11 22 24 24 18 5 26 49 0.10 17 Midd-West 5 0 10 34 13 12 27 12 51 0.10 18 Dallastown 1 4 20 10 22 20 15 22 57 0.10 19 Lancaster CDS, P 1 10 25 2 29 21 9 28 58 0.10 20 York Suburban 5 4 15 26 19 16 30 18 64 0.10 21 Susquehannock 3 5 16 15 23 19 24 23 66 0.10 22 Lampeter-Strasbu 2 10 19 3 28 22 16 29 67 0.10 23 Ephrata 1 10 27 4 31 26 13 31 70 0.10 24 Red Lion 2 8 21 11 30 24 21 30 75 0.10 25 Lewisburg 3 6 26 32 26 23 31 24 78 0.10 26 Conrad Weiser 0 3 32 9 20 25 33 21 79 0.10 27 Wilson, PA 1 3 29 20 21 27 32 20 79 0.10 28 Cedar Crest 1 12 31 5 34 29 19 34 82 0.10 29 Palmyra, PA 0 14 34 25 36 34 12 36 82 0.10 30 Spring Grove 2 9 23 16 32 28 23 32 83 0.10 31 State College Ar 1 4 24 27 25 31 29 25 85 0.10 32 York Catholic 0 9 33 17 35 32 20 35 87 0.10 33 Lower Dauphin 2 10 30 14 33 30 25 33 88 0.10 34 Central Susqueha 0 0 18 33 15 33 34 13 0 0.10 35 McCaskey 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.10 36 Northern York 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.10