2022 NCAA Men's Division II pr

2022 NCAA Men's Division II 09 23 22 17:20 PDT

Switch to RPI Method

Power Rating (PR) Explanation	Strength Of Schedule (SOS) Explanation	Quality Wins Factor(QWF) Explanation	Championship Probability Explanation
Power Ratings (PR) Print Version	Strength Of Schedule (SOS) Print Version	Quality Win Factor (QWF) Print Version	Champ & Selection Print Version

Rank	Team	PR	SOS	QWF	Champion %
1	Tampa ( 21 - 0 )	1	2	1	33 . 0 %
2	Rollins ( 12 - 3 )	3	5	5	13 . 0 %
3	Lenoir-Rhyne ( 15 - 4 )	4	9	3	10 . 0 %
4	Limestone ( 17 - 3 )	2	11	2	8 . 0 %
5	Indianapolis ( 14 - 4 )	10	10	6	5 . 0 %
6	Lindenwood ( 12 - 4 )	7	7	12	5 . 0 %
7	Florida So ( 12 - 6 )	5	3	11	4 . 0 %
8	Wingate ( 13 - 5 )	6	16	9	4 . 0 %
9	Colorado Mesa ( 14 - 4 )	9	23	13	3 . 0 %
10	Mercyhurst ( 11 - 5 )	8	31	17	3 . 0 %
11	Adelphi ( 15 - 2 )	16	24	10	2 . 0 %
12	Florida Tech ( 10 - 6 )	12	1	8	2 . 0 %
13	Le Moyne ( 16 - 4 )	11	13	7	2 . 0 %
14	Seton Hill ( 13 - 7 )	13	21	18	2 . 0 %
15	Mercy ( 16 - 2 )	17	30	4	1 . 0 %
16	Queens ( 12 - 5 )	15	27	16	1 . 0 %
17	Rockhurst ( 8 - 6 )	25	14	19	1 . 0 %
18	St Anselm ( 10 - 6 )	18	26	29	1 . 0 %
19	Adams St ( 1 - 9 )	64	6	47	0 . 10 %
20	AIC ( 1 - 14 )	67	53	74	0 . 10 %
21	Alderson Broaddus ( 1 - 10 )	73	67	61	0 . 10 %
22	Anderson SC ( 9 - 7 )	32	36	25	0 . 10 %
23	Assumption ( 4 - 9 )	49	34	55	0 . 10 %
24	Barton ( 9 - 7 )	43	60	42	0 . 10 %
25	Belmont Abbey ( 10 - 5 )	21	25	14	0 . 10 %
26	Bentley ( 8 - 6 )	24	28	30	0 . 10 %
27	Caldwell ( 3 - 10 )	66	73	63	0 . 10 %
28	Catawba ( 5 - 10 )	51	15	44	0 . 10 %
29	Chestnut Hill ( 11 - 6 )	31	59	27	0 . 10 %
30	Chowan ( 6 - 8 )	61	71	52	0 . 10 %
31	Coker ( 2 - 14 )	56	22	69	0 . 10 %
32	CSU Pueblo ( 3 - 9 )	39	18	45	0 . 10 %
33	Davenport ( 5 - 8 )	40	35	43	0 . 10 %
34	Davis & Elkins ( 2 - 11 )	69	69	60	0 . 10 %
35	Dominican ( 6 - 7 )	65	70	46	0 . 10 %
36	D'Youville ( 0 - 11 )	75	72	70	0 . 10 %
37	Emmanuel GA ( 2 - 12 )	72	62	72	0 . 10 %
38	ERAU ( 4 - 13 )	38	17	65	0 . 10 %
39	Felician ( 8 - 6 )	58	75	41	0 . 10 %
40	Flagler ( 3 - 14 )	53	29	67	0 . 10 %
41	Franklin Pierce ( 5 - 8 )	52	45	48	0 . 10 %
42	Frostburg St ( 11 - 8 )	29	47	32	0 . 10 %
43	Georgian Ct ( 6 - 11 )	54	48	62	0 . 10 %
44	Lake Erie ( 7 - 7 )	44	37	36	0 . 10 %
45	Lander ( 11 - 6 )	33	63	33	0 . 10 %
46	Lees-McRae ( 3 - 12 )	68	61	68	0 . 10 %
47	Lewis ( 9 - 6 )	26	19	22	0 . 10 %
48	Lincoln Memorial ( 3 - 13 )	62	43	66	0 . 10 %
49	Lynn ( 5 - 10 )	23	4	34	0 . 10 %
50	Mars Hill ( 4 - 11 )	59	55	57	0 . 10 %
51	Maryville ( 9 - 5 )	30	40	26	0 . 10 %
52	Molloy ( 8 - 10 )	50	51	53	0 . 10 %
53	Montevallo ( 11 - 7 )	34	58	38	0 . 10 %
54	Mt Olive ( 10 - 6 )	28	42	28	0 . 10 %
55	N Greenville ( 9 - 9 )	41	49	49	0 . 10 %
56	Newberry ( 10 - 7 )	27	32	23	0 . 10 %
57	Pace ( 11 - 4 )	19	44	20	0 . 10 %
58	PBAU ( 5 - 9 )	36	12	39	0 . 10 %
59	Post ( 4 - 9 )	60	66	58	0 . 10 %
60	Quincy ( 4 - 10 )	55	20	59	0 . 10 %
61	Roberts Wesleyan ( 10 - 5 )	35	56	24	0 . 10 %
62	Shorter ( 1 - 12 )	74	65	71	0 . 10 %
63	SNHU ( 7 - 6 )	42	41	37	0 . 10 %
64	St Leo ( 6 - 8 )	22	8	35	0 . 10 %
65	St Michaels ( 3 - 12 )	48	33	64	0 . 10 %
66	St Rose ( 8 - 9 )	45	46	50	0 . 10 %
67	St Thomas Aquinas ( 2 - 12 )	71	74	73	0 . 10 %
68	Tusculum ( 8 - 7 )	47	52	31	0 . 10 %
69	UAH ( 10 - 7 )	37	50	40	0 . 10 %
70	UDC ( 3 - 7 )	63	64	51	0 . 10 %
71	Walsh ( 4 - 10 )	46	39	54	0 . 10 %
72	Westminster UT ( 10 - 4 )	14	38	15	0 . 10 %
73	Wheeling ( 4 - 9 )	57	57	56	0 . 10 %
74	Wilmington DE ( 11 - 4 )	20	54	21	0 . 10 %
75	Young Harris ( 1 - 14 )	70	68	75	0 . 10 %