Power Ratings(PR)Print Version |
Pating Percentage Index(RPI)Print Version |
Strength Of Schedule (SOS)Print Version |
Quality Win Factor (QWF)Print Version |
Champ & SelectionPrint Version |
| Champ % Rank | Team | PR | SOS-PR | QWF-PR | Champ % | RPI | SOS-RPI | QWF-RPI | Selection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Santa Barbara CC ( 5 - 1 ) | 1 | 12 | 2 | 73 . 33 % | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| 2 | WPI ( 3 - 0 ) | 2 | 13 | 5 | 11 . 11 % | 3 | 15 | 6 | 24 |
| 3 | Kansas State ( 5 - 1 ) | 3 | 5 | 1 | 6 . 66 % | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| 4 | Western Colorado ( 2 - 0 ) | 4 | 11 | 6 | 3 . 33 % | 17 | 19 | 5 | 41 |
| 5 | Worcester State ( 2 - 3 ) | 7 | 18 | 8 | 3 . 33 % | 13 | 21 | 8 | 42 |
| 6 | TAMU-Galveston ( 4 - 2 ) | 6 | 3 | 3 | 2 . 22 % | 4 | 4 | 3 | 11 |
| 7 | Cal State Fullerton ( 0 - 6 ) | 21 | 14 | 20 | 0 . 0 % | 15 | 11 | 21 | 47 |
| 8 | Claremont ( 2 - 2 ) | 5 | 10 | 7 | 0 . 0 % | 6 | 5 | 7 | 18 |
| 9 | Fitchburg State ( 0 - 4 ) | 20 | 6 | 19 | 0 . 0 % | 16 | 13 | 20 | 49 |
| 10 | Framingham State ( 2 - 1 ) | 15 | 15 | 9 | 0 . 0 % | 9 | 14 | 9 | 32 |
| 11 | Long Beach State ( 5 - 5 ) | 10 | 17 | 16 | 0 . 0 % | 8 | 7 | 12 | 27 |
| 12 | Louisiana ( 1 - 2 ) | 8 | 2 | 15 | 0 . 0 % | 7 | 9 | 10 | 26 |
| 14 | Moorpark ( 2 - 4 ) | 16 | 8 | 11 | 0 . 0 % | 11 | 12 | 14 | 37 |
| 15 | New Mexico ( 0 - 2 ) | 12 | 19 | 12 | 0 . 0 % | 19 | 17 | 15 | 51 |
| 16 | Northern Colorado ( 0 - 2 ) | 17 | 1 | 17 | 0 . 0 % | 20 | 18 | 17 | 55 |
| 17 | St Edwards ( 0 - 3 ) | 19 | 4 | 21 | 0 . 0 % | 14 | 10 | 18 | 42 |
| 18 | TAMU-Corps of Cadets ( 3 - 3 ) | 9 | 7 | 4 | 0 . 0 % | 5 | 6 | 4 | 15 |
| 19 | Tarleton State ( 1 - 6 ) | 18 | 9 | 18 | 0 . 0 % | 12 | 3 | 19 | 34 |
| 20 | UC Irvine ( 5 - 2 ) | 14 | 16 | 13 | 0 . 0 % | 10 | 8 | 11 | 29 |