2016 girls WA Strength of Schedule ARC
Based on Power Ratings Based on RPIRank Team SOS W L | Rank Team SOS W L Rnk Value | Rnk Value | 1 Lake Sammamish 1 87.43 12 4 | 1 Lake Sammamish 1 0.75 12 4 2 Overlake Schoo 2 86.99 4 8 | 2 Mercer Island 2 0.73 9 6 3 Issaquah 3 85.94 10 4 | 3 Eastside Catho 3 0.70 16 0 4 Mercer Island 4 85.72 9 6 | 4 Issaquah 4 0.69 10 4 5 Lakeside Schoo 5 84.46 3 9 | 5 Bainbridge Isl 5 0.66 13 1 6 Snohomish 6 83.53 9 5 | 6 Overlake Schoo 6 0.65 4 8 7 Eastside Catho 7 83.51 16 0 | 7 Lakeside Schoo 7 0.64 3 9 8 Bainbridge Isl 8 83.42 13 1 | 8 Snohomish 8 0.64 9 5 9 Holy Names Aca 9 83.03 3 8 | 9 Nport-Sam-Inte 9 0.64 8 5 10 Nport-Sam-Inte 10 83.00 8 5 | 10 Roosevelt, WA 10 0.62 10 5 11 Roosevelt, WA 11 82.71 10 5 | 11 Holy Names Aca 11 0.61 3 8 12 Bellevue 12 82.23 3 9 | 12 Bellarmine Pre 12 0.59 5 7 13 Evergreen, WA 13 77.61 2 14 | 13 Bellevue 13 0.59 3 9 14 Wenatchee 14 77.23 0 12 | 14 Evergreen, WA 14 0.57 2 14 15 Bellarmine Pre 15 76.53 5 7 | 15 Stadium 15 0.54 6 7 16 Mount Si 16 75.62 7 5 | 16 Mount Si 16 0.54 7 5 17 Seattle Prep S 17 75.57 10 3 | 17 Kennedy, WA 17 0.53 6 4 18 Stadium 18 74.78 6 7 | 18 Wenatchee 18 0.52 0 12 19 Kennedy, WA 19 74.43 6 4 | 19 Seattle Prep S 19 0.51 10 3 20 Ballard, WA 20 74.41 6 5 | 20 Sumner 20 0.51 8 5 21 Garfield, WA 21 73.74 4 8 | 21 Puyallup 21 0.51 10 3 22 Nathan Hale 22 72.14 5 7 | 22 Garfield, WA 22 0.51 4 8 23 Puyallup 23 71.34 10 3 | 23 Ballard, WA 23 0.51 6 5 24 Tahoma 24 71.22 2 10 | 24 Tahoma 24 0.48 2 10 25 Bellingham, WA 25 70.85 9 4 | 25 Curtis, WA 25 0.48 8 5 26 Sumner 26 70.46 8 5 | 26 Nathan Hale 26 0.46 5 7 27 Bethel, WA 27 69.97 0 12 | 27 Bethel, WA 27 0.46 0 12 28 Klahowya 28 69.95 1 11 | 28 Spanaway Lake 28 0.46 2 10 29 Spanaway Lake 29 69.60 2 10 | 29 Graham-Kapowsi 29 0.46 4 8 30 Curtis, WA 30 69.29 8 5 | 30 Bellingham, WA 30 0.45 9 4 31 Gig Harbor 31 69.20 5 7 | 31 Klahowya 31 0.45 1 11 32 Graham-Kapowsi 32 68.88 4 8 | 32 Gig Harbor 32 0.43 5 7 33 Auburn-Riversi 33 67.61 10 3 | 33 Auburn-Riversi 33 0.43 10 3