2016 girls Vermont Strength of Schedule ARC
Based on Power Ratings Based on RPIRank Team SOS W L | Rank Team SOS W L Rnk Value | Rnk Value | 1 Burlington, VT 1 92.39 3 13 | 1 Middlebury Uni 1 0.72 14 5 2 Woodstock Unio 2 92.37 10 7 | 2 Woodstock Unio 2 0.70 10 7 3 South Burlingt 3 91.83 8 11 | 3 South Burlingt 3 0.69 8 11 4 Middlebury Uni 4 91.75 14 5 | 4 Champlain Vall 4 0.67 12 4 5 Champlain Vall 5 91.68 12 4 | 5 Essex 5 0.66 7 11 6 Essex 6 91.51 7 11 | 6 Mt. Mansfield 6 0.65 15 3 7 Rutland 7 90.09 7 8 | 7 Burlington, VT 7 0.63 3 13 8 Burr & Burton 8 89.92 8 7 | 8 U-32 8 0.61 14 5 9 Spaulding, VT 9 89.79 2 14 | 9 Colchester 9 0.61 8 10 10 Mt. Mansfield 10 89.67 15 3 | 10 Rutland 10 0.61 7 8 11 Rice Memorial 11 89.22 14 5 | 11 Rice Memorial 11 0.60 14 5 12 BFA-St. Albans 12 87.80 5 10 | 12 Burr & Burton 12 0.60 8 7 13 Harwood Union 13 87.18 3 11 | 13 Chelsea 13 0.58 17 3 14 Colchester 14 86.95 8 10 | 14 Spaulding, VT 14 0.55 2 14 15 U-32 15 86.46 14 5 | 15 BFA-St. Albans 15 0.55 5 10 16 Randolph Union 16 85.87 1 11 | 16 Lamoille Union 16 0.55 4 11 17 Hartford 17 85.72 2 12 | 17 Harwood Union 17 0.54 3 11 18 Lamoille Union 18 85.03 4 11 | 18 Stowe 18 0.53 9 7 19 Brattleboro Un 19 84.96 6 11 | 19 Stratton Mtn S 19 0.53 4 8 20 Mt. Anthony Un 20 84.81 15 2 | 20 Hartford 20 0.51 2 12 21 Stowe 21 84.61 9 7 | 21 Brattleboro Un 21 0.50 6 11 22 Chelsea 22 83.92 17 3 | 22 Randolph Union 22 0.48 1 11 23 St. Johnsbury 23 82.23 8 7 | 23 Mt. Anthony Un 23 0.46 15 2 24 Green Mountain 24 81.76 8 4 | 24 St. Johnsbury 24 0.45 8 7 25 Stratton Mtn S 25 74.87 4 8 | 25 Green Mountain 25 0.43 8 4