2016 girls Utah Strength of Schedule ARC
Based on Power Ratings Based on RPIRank Team SOS W L | Rank Team SOS W L Rnk Value | Rnk Value | 1 Herriman 1 87.27 11 3 | 1 American Fork 1 0.70 13 2 2 Juan Diego CS 2 86.54 7 8 | 2 Alta 2 0.66 10 5 3 Park City 3 86.28 15 2 | 3 Herriman 3 0.65 11 3 4 Copper Hills 4 85.74 6 7 | 4 Juan Diego CS 4 0.65 7 8 5 Riverton 5 85.71 8 6 | 5 Olympus 5 0.64 7 7 6 American Fork 6 85.69 13 2 | 6 Brighton, UT 6 0.64 11 2 7 Brighton, UT 7 85.60 11 2 | 7 Riverton 7 0.63 8 6 8 Olympus 8 85.20 7 7 | 8 Lone Peak 8 0.62 11 3 9 Jordan, UT 9 84.77 7 6 | 9 Bingham 9 0.61 9 5 10 Alta 10 84.55 10 5 | 10 Copper Hills 10 0.60 6 7 11 Corner Canyon 11 83.95 3 10 | 11 Jordan, UT 11 0.58 7 6 12 Lehi 12 83.37 9 4 | 12 Lehi 12 0.58 9 4 13 Judge Memorial 13 82.98 3 9 | 13 Corner Canyon 13 0.58 3 10 14 Lone Peak 14 82.91 11 3 | 14 Park City 14 0.58 15 2 15 Woods Cross 15 82.72 6 8 | 15 Skyline, UT 15 0.58 5 9 16 Bingham 16 82.49 9 5 | 16 West Jordan 16 0.57 7 6 17 Skyline, UT 17 82.41 5 9 | 17 Woods Cross 17 0.55 6 8 18 West Jordan 18 82.05 7 6 | 18 Davis, UT 18 0.55 6 8 19 Davis, UT 19 81.62 6 8 | 19 Timpanogos 19 0.54 2 10 20 Timpanogos 20 81.43 2 10 | 20 Roy 20 0.53 9 6 21 Waterford, UT 21 80.36 5 8 | 21 Pleasant Grove 21 0.53 7 7 22 Roy 22 79.87 9 6 | 22 Waterford, UT 22 0.51 5 8 23 Pleasant Grove 23 79.43 7 7 | 23 Judge Memorial 23 0.51 3 9 24 West, UT 24 79.36 1 10 | 24 Viewmont 24 0.50 9 5 25 Mountain Crest 25 78.46 1 11 | 25 Timpview 25 0.46 6 6 26 Sky View 26 77.97 2 10 | 26 West, UT 26 0.45 1 10 27 Wasatch 27 77.92 1 11 | 27 Sky View 27 0.45 2 10 28 Timpview 28 77.15 6 6 | 28 Wasatch 28 0.45 1 11 29 Viewmont 29 77.00 9 5 | 29 Mountain Crest 29 0.44 1 11 30 Weber 30 75.80 5 8 | 30 Weber 30 0.43 5 8