2016 girls Nevada Strength of Schedule ARC
Based on Power Ratings Based on RPIRank Team SOS W L | Rank Team SOS W L Rnk Value | Rnk Value | 1 Reed 1 81.97 0 18 | 1 Bishop Manogue 1 0.66 13 6 2 Damonte Ranch 2 81.05 2 14 | 2 Galena 2 0.64 16 0 3 Palo Verde 3 81.02 0 14 | 3 Reed 3 0.64 0 18 4 Coronado, NV 4 80.53 8 6 | 4 Coronado, NV 4 0.64 8 6 5 Henderson, NV 5 80.48 2 11 | 5 Somerset 5 0.64 8 7 6 Truckee 6 80.06 6 8 | 6 McQueen 6 0.63 8 6 7 Somerset 7 80.00 8 7 | 7 North Tahoe 7 0.63 14 2 8 McQueen 8 79.94 8 6 | 8 Bishop Gorman 8 0.63 14 1 9 Centennial, NV 9 79.85 5 9 | 9 Desert Hills 9 0.62 14 1 10 Spanish Spring 10 79.70 7 9 | 10 Damonte Ranch 10 0.62 2 14 11 Faith Lutheran 11 79.55 6 8 | 11 Faith Lutheran 11 0.60 6 8 12 Reno 12 78.75 6 8 | 12 Centennial, NV 12 0.60 5 9 13 North Tahoe 13 78.11 14 2 | 13 Palo Verde 13 0.59 0 14 14 Desert Hills 14 77.93 14 1 | 14 Henderson, NV 14 0.57 2 11 15 Bishop Gorman 15 77.89 14 1 | 15 Spanish Spring 15 0.54 7 9 16 Bishop Manogue 16 77.73 13 6 | 16 Reno 16 0.53 6 8 17 Galena 17 77.27 16 0 | 17 Truckee 17 0.51 6 8