2014 girls Utah Strength of Schedule ARC
Based on Power Ratings Based on RPIRank Team SOS W L | Rank Team SOS W L Rnk Value | Rnk Value | 1 Jordan, UT 1 90.27 5 6 | 1 Riverton 1 0.65 13 2 2 Bingham 2 89.79 4 9 | 2 Bingham 2 0.65 4 9 3 Corner Canyon 3 88.58 3 9 | 3 Jordan, UT 3 0.65 5 6 4 Judge Memorial 4 87.88 1 11 | 4 Park City 4 0.64 15 0 5 Lone Peak 5 87.17 2 10 | 5 Skyline, UT 5 0.63 7 6 6 Juan Diego CS 6 87.05 10 4 | 6 Juan Diego CS 6 0.62 10 4 7 Riverton 7 86.90 13 2 | 7 Olympus 7 0.61 9 4 8 Herriman 8 86.64 5 7 | 8 Corner Canyon 8 0.61 3 9 9 Brighton, UT 9 86.23 11 3 | 9 Judge Memorial 9 0.61 1 11 10 Skyline, UT 10 86.10 7 6 | 10 Brighton, UT 10 0.60 11 3 11 Park City 11 85.93 15 0 | 11 Lone Peak 11 0.60 2 10 12 Olympus 12 85.14 9 4 | 12 Herriman 12 0.57 5 7 13 Alta 13 84.74 8 5 | 13 Alta 13 0.56 8 5 14 American Fork 14 81.98 7 5 | 14 Lehi 14 0.56 10 5 15 Cache Valley 15 81.49 4 7 | 15 Pleasant Grove 15 0.56 11 3 16 Weber 16 79.41 1 10 | 16 Cache Valley 16 0.54 4 7 17 West, UT 17 78.92 0 11 | 17 Davis, UT 17 0.53 5 8 18 Pleasant Grove 18 77.26 11 3 | 18 Roy 18 0.52 8 4 19 Timpanogos 19 77.24 0 12 | 19 Weber 19 0.52 1 10 20 Lehi 20 77.16 10 5 | 20 West, UT 20 0.51 0 11 21 West Jordan 21 76.96 2 10 | 21 Woods Cross 21 0.51 10 1 22 Woods Cross 22 76.90 10 1 | 22 West Jordan 22 0.50 2 10 23 Waterford, UT 23 76.42 6 7 | 23 Waterford, UT 23 0.49 6 7 24 Davis, UT 24 76.27 5 8 | 24 American Fork 24 0.49 7 5 25 Sky View 25 76.17 5 6 | 25 Viewmont 25 0.48 9 3 26 Copper Hills 26 76.11 6 6 | 26 Copper Hills 26 0.48 6 6 27 Timpview 27 75.95 4 7 | 27 Timpanogos 27 0.48 0 12 28 Roy 28 75.61 8 4 | 28 Sky View 28 0.46 5 6 29 Viewmont 29 75.31 9 3 | 29 Timpview 29 0.43 4 7