2013 girls Vermont Strength of Schedule ARC
Based on Power Ratings Based on RPIRank Team SOS W L | Rank Team SOS W L Rnk Value | Rnk Value | 1 Middlebury Uni 1 88.69 12 5 | 1 Middlebury Uni 1 0.67 12 5 2 Champlain Vall 2 87.75 6 9 | 2 Burlington, VT 2 0.66 6 10 3 Burlington, VT 3 87.50 6 10 | 3 Woodstock Unio 3 0.63 6 10 4 Mt. Mansfield 4 87.23 7 9 | 4 Burr & Burton 4 0.63 15 3 5 Rutland 5 87.11 5 11 | 5 Mt. Mansfield 5 0.63 7 9 6 Essex 6 86.39 7 8 | 6 Mt. Anthony Un 6 0.63 11 9 7 Woodstock Unio 7 85.81 6 10 | 7 Rice Memorial 7 0.62 16 2 8 South Burlingt 8 85.44 15 2 | 8 Rutland 8 0.62 5 11 9 Burr & Burton 9 84.92 15 3 | 9 Harwood Union 9 0.61 6 7 10 Hartford 10 82.68 1 12 | 10 Essex 10 0.61 7 8 11 Spaulding, VT 11 82.41 6 9 | 11 Champlain Vall 11 0.60 6 9 12 Harwood Union 12 82.01 6 7 | 12 South Burlingt 12 0.59 15 2 13 Mt. Anthony Un 13 81.94 11 9 | 13 U-32 13 0.58 16 1 14 BFA-St. Albans 14 81.87 14 3 | 14 Spaulding, VT 14 0.58 6 9 15 St. Johnsbury 15 81.81 3 13 | 15 St. Johnsbury 15 0.58 3 13 16 Chelsea 16 81.64 5 9 | 16 Randolph Union 16 0.58 0 16 17 Randolph Union 17 80.73 0 16 | 17 Chelsea 17 0.57 5 9 18 Rice Memorial 18 80.27 16 2 | 18 Lamoille Union 18 0.57 10 7 19 Brattleboro Un 19 80.04 9 7 | 19 BFA-St. Albans 19 0.56 14 3 20 Montpelier 20 80.00 4 9 | 20 Oxbow Union 20 0.54 8 6 21 U-32 21 79.15 16 1 | 21 Montpelier 21 0.51 4 9 22 Stowe 22 79.10 4 9 | 22 Stowe 22 0.50 4 9 23 Green Mountain 23 79.03 2 7 | 23 Hartford 23 0.49 1 12 24 Lamoille Union 24 78.21 10 7 | 24 Brattleboro Un 24 0.46 9 7 25 Oxbow Union 25 77.89 8 6 | 25 Green Mountain 25 0.45 2 7