2012 girls South Carolina Strength of Schedule ARC

Based on Power Ratings Based on RPI
Rank Team SOS W L | Rank Team SOS W L Rnk Value | Rnk Value | 1 J.L. Mann Acad 1 87.42 12 6 | 1 Wando 1 0.73 14 1 2 Riverside, SC 2 86.20 11 5 | 2 Fort Mill 2 0.72 15 2 3 Greenville, SC 3 85.78 2 9 | 3 J.L. Mann Acad 3 0.69 12 6 4 Fort Mill 4 84.27 15 2 | 4 Riverside, SC 4 0.66 11 5 5 Mauldin 5 84.13 5 5 | 5 Bishop England 5 0.60 11 3 6 Hilton Head 6 83.88 3 6 | 6 West Ashley 6 0.58 2 12 7 Hillcrest, SC 7 82.99 6 8 | 7 Chapin HS, SC 7 0.57 12 3 8 Academic Magne 8 82.85 2 6 | 8 Spring Valley 8 0.56 5 6 9 Richland North 9 82.80 0 11 | 9 Hillcrest, SC 9 0.56 6 8 10 Socastee 10 82.71 6 6 | 10 Greenville, SC 10 0.56 2 9 11 West Ashley 11 82.21 2 12 | 11 Blythewood 11 0.56 13 4 12 Bluffton 12 82.14 5 6 | 12 Dorman 12 0.56 7 7 13 Spring Valley 13 82.13 5 6 | 13 Richland North 13 0.55 0 11 14 Wando 14 82.09 14 1 | 14 Socastee 14 0.55 6 6 15 Savannah Prep 15 81.44 1 3 | 15 Mauldin 15 0.54 5 5 16 Clinton, SC 16 81.33 2 9 | 16 Spartanburg 16 0.54 8 4 17 Dorman 17 81.24 7 7 | 17 Academic Magne 17 0.50 2 6 18 Savannah Club 18 80.65 0 3 | 18 Eastside, SC 18 0.50 10 4 19 Spartanburg 19 80.47 8 4 | 19 Savannah Prep 19 0.50 1 3 20 Ridge View Clu 20 79.71 2 4 | 20 Ridge View Clu 20 0.50 2 4 21 Wade Hampton 21 79.55 0 10 | 21 Savannah Club 21 0.49 0 3 22 Eastside, SC 22 79.35 10 4 | 22 A.C. Flora 22 0.48 3 8 23 Woodmont 23 79.33 2 8 | 23 Bluffton 23 0.44 5 6 24 Bishop England 24 79.17 11 3 | 24 Ashley Hall Cl 24 0.44 0 2 25 Christ Church 25 78.62 5 6 | 25 Clinton, SC 25 0.43 2 9 26 A.C. Flora 26 78.43 3 8 | 26 Woodmont 26 0.40 2 8 27 Ashley Hall Cl 27 78.15 0 2 | 27 Christ Church 27 0.39 5 6 28 Blythewood 28 77.77 13 4 | 28 Hilton Head 28 0.38 3 6 29 Chapin HS, SC 29 76.98 12 3 | 29 Wade Hampton 29 0.33 0 10 30 Charleston Clu 0 0.00 0 0 | 30 Charleston Clu 0 0.00 0 0