2011 girls Utah Strength of Schedule ARC

Based on Power Ratings Based on RPI
Rank Team SOS W L | Rank Team SOS W L Rnk Value | Rnk Value | 1 Brighton, UT 1 85.89 10 5 | 1 Bingham 1 0.72 17 4 2 Lone Peak 2 85.73 2 6 | 2 Park City 2 0.67 8 7 3 Juan Diego CS 3 83.79 2 9 | 3 Skyline, UT 3 0.61 7 6 4 Bingham 4 83.58 17 4 | 4 Lone Peak 4 0.60 2 6 5 Alta 5 83.31 20 0 | 5 Alta 5 0.60 20 0 6 Jordan, UT 6 82.91 8 6 | 6 Brighton, UT 6 0.59 10 5 7 Olympus 7 82.53 10 6 | 7 Juan Diego CS 7 0.58 2 9 8 Park City 8 82.22 8 7 | 8 Copper Hills 8 0.57 6 6 9 Judge Memorial 9 81.72 8 7 | 9 Jordan, UT 9 0.57 8 6 10 Copper Hills 10 80.52 6 6 | 10 Riverton 10 0.57 9 4 11 Riverton 11 80.43 9 4 | 11 West, UT 11 0.54 3 10 12 Skyline, UT 12 80.37 7 6 | 12 West Jordan 12 0.53 1 11 13 Murray 13 79.39 3 9 | 13 Olympus 13 0.53 10 6 14 Woods Cross 14 78.84 0 11 | 14 Sky View 14 0.53 3 10 15 West Jordan 15 77.86 1 11 | 15 Lehi 15 0.52 3 10 16 Bountiful 16 77.59 1 10 | 16 Pleasant Grove 16 0.52 5 7 17 West, UT 17 75.67 3 10 | 17 Murray 17 0.51 3 9 18 Lehi 18 75.50 3 10 | 18 Orem 18 0.50 11 3 19 Sky View 19 74.81 3 10 | 19 Herriman 19 0.49 4 9 20 Waterford, UT 20 74.69 9 5 | 20 Viewmont 20 0.49 9 4 21 Cache Valley 21 74.64 5 7 | 21 Cache Valley 21 0.47 5 7 22 Pleasant Grove 22 74.50 5 7 | 22 Waterford, UT 22 0.47 9 5 23 Viewmont 23 73.54 9 4 | 23 Woods Cross 23 0.47 0 11 24 Timpview 24 73.23 4 8 | 24 Bountiful 24 0.45 1 10 25 Herriman 25 72.61 4 9 | 25 Judge Memorial 25 0.45 8 7 26 Orem 26 71.85 11 3 | 26 Timpview 26 0.44 4 8 27 Weber 27 71.43 9 4 | 27 Davis, UT 27 0.41 8 4 28 Davis, UT 28 71.31 8 4 | 28 Weber 28 0.38 9 4