2011 girls NYC-Metro Schools Strength of Schedule ARC
Based on Power Ratings Based on RPIRank Team SOS W L | Rank Team SOS W L Rnk Value | Rnk Value | 1 Trinity School 1 93.29 1 7 | 1 Curtis, NY 1 0.67 11 7 2 Horace Mann Sc 2 90.89 3 9 | 2 Nightingale-Ba 2 0.65 0 6 3 Dalton School 3 89.90 0 9 | 3 Hunter HS 3 0.63 14 1 4 Marymount Scho 4 87.93 0 11 | 4 Horace Mann Sc 4 0.61 3 9 5 Poly Prep CDS 5 87.50 10 5 | 5 Stuyvesant 5 0.60 2 13 6 Fieldston Scho 6 86.95 5 9 | 6 Beach-Channel- 6 0.60 11 5 7 Portledge Scho 7 86.76 3 10 | 7 Trinity School 7 0.60 1 7 8 Hackley School 8 85.74 14 4 | 8 James Madison, 8 0.59 10 3 9 Riverdale CDS, 9 85.72 17 1 | 9 Frederick Doug 9 0.59 4 10 10 Spence 10 85.56 0 3 | 10 Benjamin Cardo 10 0.58 5 10 11 Nightingale-Ba 11 83.59 0 6 | 11 Midwood 11 0.57 10 6 12 Convent-Sacred 12 82.23 6 1 | 12 A.P. Randolph, 12 0.55 4 8 13 Staten Island 13 82.20 11 6 | 13 Queens HS of T 13 0.53 0 12 14 Chapin School, 14 82.16 6 5 | 14 Hackley School 14 0.53 14 4 15 Brearley Schoo 15 81.32 7 7 | 15 Abraham Lincol 15 0.53 9 5 16 Queens HS of T 16 79.18 0 12 | 16 Herbert H. Leh 16 0.52 2 11 17 Frederick Doug 17 78.67 4 10 | 17 Portledge Scho 17 0.52 3 10 18 Midwood 18 78.54 10 6 | 18 Long Island Ci 18 0.50 5 6 19 Curtis, NY 19 78.41 11 7 | 19 Bronx Acad of 19 0.49 0 11 20 Stuyvesant 20 78.21 2 13 | 20 Poly Prep CDS 20 0.49 10 5 21 Long Island Lu 21 78.05 12 2 | 21 Staten Island 21 0.49 11 6 22 Tottenville 22 77.27 20 1 | 22 Tottenville 22 0.49 20 1 23 Benjamin Cardo 23 77.18 5 10 | 23 Marymount Scho 23 0.46 0 11 24 Beach-Channel- 24 76.82 11 5 | 24 Dalton School 24 0.46 0 9 25 Bronx Acad of 25 74.99 0 11 | 25 Long Island Lu 25 0.46 12 2 26 A.P. Randolph, 26 74.97 4 8 | 26 Spence 26 0.45 0 3 27 Herbert H. Leh 27 73.75 2 11 | 27 Chapin School, 27 0.45 6 5 28 Abraham Lincol 28 73.70 9 5 | 28 Brearley Schoo 28 0.43 7 7 29 James Madison, 29 72.68 10 3 | 29 Riverdale CDS, 29 0.42 17 1 30 Long Island Ci 30 72.13 5 6 | 30 Fieldston Scho 30 0.41 5 9 31 Hunter HS 31 71.12 14 1 | 31 Convent-Sacred 31 0.27 6 1