2010 girls South Carolina Strength of Schedule ARC
Based on Power Ratings Based on RPIRank Team SOS W L | Rank Team SOS W L Rnk Value | Rnk Value | 1 Spartanburg 1 84.59 0 7 | 1 Blythewood 1 0.71 16 0 2 Bluffton 2 84.08 6 9 | 2 Greenville, SC 2 0.65 7 5 3 Greenville, SC 3 83.97 7 5 | 3 Wando 3 0.65 13 2 4 Hilton Head 4 83.79 4 8 | 4 Bluffton 4 0.64 6 9 5 Clinton, SC 5 82.94 0 9 | 5 J.L. Mann Acad 5 0.62 11 3 6 Eastside, SC 6 82.57 6 5 | 6 Hilton Head 6 0.59 4 8 7 Wade Hampton 7 82.10 4 7 | 7 Woodmont 7 0.58 6 10 8 J.L. Mann Acad 8 81.88 11 3 | 8 Riverside, SC 8 0.57 16 2 9 Hillcrest, SC 9 81.56 4 7 | 9 Spartanburg 9 0.53 0 7 10 Riverside, SC 10 81.54 16 2 | 10 Mauldin 10 0.52 8 4 11 Dorman 11 81.29 1 8 | 11 Savannah Club 11 0.52 1 1 12 Woodmont 12 80.67 6 10 | 12 Wade Hampton 12 0.52 4 7 13 Mauldin 13 80.17 8 4 | 13 Hillcrest, SC 13 0.51 4 7 14 Blythewood 14 79.80 16 0 | 14 A.C. Flora 14 0.51 4 6 15 Wando 15 79.65 13 2 | 15 Bishop England 15 0.50 4 8 16 Fort Mill 16 79.40 9 7 | 16 Clinton, SC 16 0.48 0 9 17 Spring Valley 17 79.26 2 9 | 17 Eastside, SC 17 0.48 6 5 18 A.C. Flora 18 78.84 4 6 | 18 Spring Valley 18 0.48 2 9 19 Bishop England 19 77.96 4 8 | 19 Ridge View 19 0.47 6 4 20 Socastee 20 77.70 3 7 | 20 Socastee 20 0.46 3 7 21 Savannah Club 21 77.40 1 1 | 21 Fort Mill 21 0.44 9 7 22 Ridge View 22 75.93 6 4 | 22 Dorman 22 0.44 1 8 23 Charleston 23 75.74 7 5 | 23 Charleston 23 0.43 7 5 24 Chapin HS, SC 24 74.70 1 10 | 24 West Ashley 24 0.35 2 8 25 West Ashley 25 73.85 2 8 | 25 Chapin HS, SC 25 0.35 1 10 26 Richland North 0 0.00 0 0 | 26 Richland North 0 0.00 0 0