![]()
2006 girls Vermont Strength of Schedule ARC
Based on Power Ratings Based on RPI
Rank Team SOS W L | Rank Team SOS W L Rnk Value | Rnk Value | 1 Mt. Mansfield 1 93.22 8 8 | 1 Burlington, VT 1 0.66 4 13 2 Middlebury Uni 2 93.04 10 5 | 2 Spaulding, VT 2 0.66 3 11 3 Spaulding, VT 3 91.92 3 11 | 3 Essex 3 0.65 12 3 4 South Burlingt 4 91.87 13 3 | 4 Champlain Vall 4 0.65 11 4 5 Champlain Vall 5 91.43 11 4 | 5 Rutland 5 0.64 8 9 6 Rutland 6 91.21 8 9 | 6 Montpelier 6 0.61 12 4 7 Mt. Anthony Un 7 91.20 8 10 | 7 South Burlingt 7 0.56 13 3 8 Burlington, VT 8 91.18 4 13 | 8 Burr & Burton 8 0.54 9 6 9 Essex 9 91.17 12 3 | 9 Rice Memorial 9 0.54 2 13 10 Woodstock Unio 10 89.17 10 4 | 10 Lamouille Unio 10 0.53 6 8 11 Burr & Burton 11 88.21 9 6 | 11 Mt. Mansfield 11 0.53 8 8 12 Hartford 12 87.61 7 8 | 12 Chelsea 12 0.52 6 4 13 Chelsea 13 87.37 6 4 | 13 Woodstock Unio 13 0.51 10 4 14 Stratton Mtn S 14 86.41 0 4 | 14 Middlebury Uni 14 0.51 10 5 15 Rice Memorial 15 86.06 2 13 | 15 Mt. Anthony Un 15 0.50 8 10 16 St. Johnsbury 16 85.55 1 10 | 16 U-32 16 0.50 15 1 17 Randolph Union 17 85.15 4 10 | 17 St. Johnsbury 17 0.50 1 10 18 Brattleboro Un 18 84.93 3 11 | 18 BFA-St. Albans 18 0.47 7 5 19 Montpelier 19 84.92 12 4 | 19 Brattleboro Un 19 0.46 3 11 20 Lamouille Unio 20 83.93 6 8 | 20 Hartford 20 0.45 7 8 21 U-32 21 82.27 15 1 | 21 Randolph Union 21 0.42 4 10 22 Oxbow Union 22 82.24 0 6 | 22 Oxbow Union 22 0.41 0 6 23 BFA-St. Albans 23 82.08 7 5 | 23 Green Mountain 23 0.34 3 3 24 Green Mountain 24 80.33 3 3 | 24 Stratton Mtn S 24 0.26 0 4