2006 girls Minnesota Club Strength of Schedule ARC
Based on Power Ratings Based on RPIRank Team SOS W L | Rank Team SOS W L Rnk Value | Rnk Value | 1 Osseo 1 88.46 2 7 | 1 Hastings, MN 1 0.60 0 8 2 Hastings, MN 2 87.76 0 8 | 2 North Suburban 2 0.59 11 0 3 Stillwater 3 87.75 6 3 | 3 Stillwater 3 0.59 6 3 4 North Suburban 4 87.58 11 0 | 4 Osseo 4 0.58 2 7 5 Buffalo 5 86.53 2 7 | 5 Rochester, MN 5 0.56 8 2 6 Maple Grove 6 86.43 6 2 | 6 RAVE-Eagan 6 0.55 8 2 7 Woodbury 7 86.18 2 6 | 7 Orono 7 0.53 3 6 8 Cretin-Derham 8 86.16 1 6 | 8 Cretin-Derham 8 0.52 1 6 9 Orono 9 86.14 3 6 | 9 Woodbury 9 0.52 2 6 10 Mound-Westonka 10 85.89 3 5 | 10 Mound-Westonka 10 0.52 3 5 11 RAVE-Eagan 11 85.06 8 2 | 11 Minneapolis 11 0.51 6 3 12 Minneapolis 12 84.90 6 3 | 12 Owatonna 12 0.50 3 8 13 Rochester, MN 13 84.77 8 2 | 13 Lakeville 13 0.49 5 4 14 Anoka 14 84.55 1 8 | 14 Buffalo 14 0.49 2 7 15 Lakeville 15 84.53 5 4 | 15 Centennial, MN 15 0.48 7 3 16 Centennial, MN 16 84.38 7 3 | 16 Elk River 16 0.47 0 8 17 Duluth 17 84.25 1 7 | 17 Maple Grove 17 0.47 6 2 18 Elk River 18 84.07 0 8 | 18 Becker 18 0.46 7 3 19 Owatonna 19 83.96 3 8 | 19 Anoka 19 0.46 1 8 20 Becker 20 83.80 7 3 | 20 Hill-Murray 20 0.46 5 5 21 Andover, MN 21 83.73 1 8 | 21 Duluth 21 0.45 1 7 22 Mankato 22 82.47 5 3 | 22 Mankato 22 0.45 5 3 23 Hill-Murray 23 82.12 5 5 | 23 North Suburban 23 0.43 4 2 24 Monticello, MN 24 81.98 9 1 | 24 Monticello, MN 24 0.43 9 1 25 North Suburban 25 81.58 4 2 | 25 White Bear Lak 25 0.40 6 3 26 White Bear Lak 26 80.82 6 3 | 26 Andover, MN 26 0.38 1 8 27 Richfield 0 0.00 0 0 | 27 Richfield 0 0.00 0 0