2006 girls Connecticut Strength of Schedule ARC
Based on Power Ratings Based on RPIRank Team SOS W L | Rank Team SOS W L Rnk Value | Rnk Value | 1 Darien 1 89.84 19 3 | 1 Branford 1 0.74 10 9 2 Wilton 2 89.73 15 6 | 2 New Canaan 2 0.72 11 5 3 Greenwich HS 3 88.55 12 5 | 3 Cheshire HS 3 0.71 15 3 4 South Windsor 4 87.59 11 7 | 4 Daniel Hand 4 0.70 14 6 5 Branford 5 87.51 10 9 | 5 Glastonbury 5 0.70 16 2 6 Simsbury 6 86.64 4 9 | 6 Joel Barlow 6 0.67 10 8 7 New Canaan 7 85.94 11 5 | 7 Newtown 7 0.66 17 2 8 Cheshire HS 8 85.78 15 3 | 8 Guilford, CT 8 0.65 10 8 9 Conard 9 85.52 7 9 | 9 Stonington 9 0.65 10 7 10 Glastonbury 10 84.75 16 2 | 10 Danbury 10 0.64 10 9 11 Daniel Hand 11 84.43 14 6 | 11 Fairfield Ward 11 0.64 4 10 12 Brien McMahon 12 83.41 4 10 | 12 Norwich Free A 12 0.64 12 5 13 St. Joseph, CT 13 82.91 4 12 | 13 New Milford 13 0.64 8 10 14 Guilford, CT 14 82.76 10 8 | 14 Trumbull 14 0.64 10 7 15 Ridgefield 15 82.50 9 7 | 15 Avon 15 0.63 16 4 16 Fairfield Ward 16 82.42 4 10 | 16 Fairfield Ludl 16 0.63 14 4 17 Staples 17 82.41 2 13 | 17 St. Joseph, CT 17 0.63 4 12 18 Southington 18 82.05 6 8 | 18 New Fairfield 18 0.62 13 4 19 Hall, West Har 19 81.98 9 8 | 19 Brookfield 19 0.62 15 5 20 Danbury 20 81.94 10 9 | 20 Conard 20 0.62 7 9 21 Trumbull 21 81.45 10 7 | 21 Masuk 21 0.61 5 10 22 Mercy, CT 22 80.80 5 9 | 22 Darien 22 0.61 19 3 23 Fairfield Ludl 23 80.58 14 4 | 23 Staples 23 0.61 2 13 24 Windsor 24 80.09 5 11 | 24 Greenwich HS 24 0.61 12 5 25 Hamden 25 79.83 11 6 | 25 Hall, West Har 25 0.60 9 8 26 Joel Barlow 26 79.74 10 8 | 26 Woodstock Acad 26 0.60 4 11 27 Amity 27 79.38 13 7 | 27 South Windsor 27 0.60 11 7 28 Newington 28 79.06 4 9 | 28 Amity 28 0.59 13 7 29 North Branford 29 78.99 1 12 | 29 Fitch 29 0.59 8 9 30 Norwich Free A 30 78.86 12 5 | 30 Sacred Heart, 30 0.59 9 9 31 Woodstock Acad 31 78.71 4 11 | 31 Hamden 31 0.59 11 6 32 Newtown 32 78.70 17 2 | 32 Southington 32 0.59 6 8 33 New Fairfield 33 78.57 13 4 | 33 Windsor 33 0.58 5 11 34 Masuk 34 78.34 5 10 | 34 St. Bernard, C 34 0.57 2 14 35 Ledyard 35 78.17 5 9 | 35 Simsbury 35 0.57 4 9 36 Farmington 36 78.13 4 10 | 36 Farmington 36 0.57 4 10 37 Stonington 37 78.08 10 7 | 37 Ledyard 37 0.56 5 9 38 Sacred Heart, 38 78.05 9 9 | 38 Ridgefield 38 0.56 9 7 39 Avon 39 77.92 16 4 | 39 Norwalk 39 0.55 7 9 40 Norwalk 40 77.88 7 9 | 40 Lauralton Hall 40 0.55 10 7 41 St. Bernard, C 41 77.88 2 14 | 41 Pomperaug 41 0.55 11 7 42 New Milford 42 77.75 8 10 | 42 Immaculate 42 0.55 1 15 43 East Lyme 43 77.64 17 1 | 43 Weston, CT 43 0.55 3 13 44 Brookfield 44 77.12 15 5 | 44 Newington 44 0.54 4 9 45 West Haven 45 76.87 5 11 | 45 North Branford 45 0.52 1 12 46 Somers, CT 46 76.41 8 8 | 46 West Haven 46 0.52 5 11 47 Fitch 47 76.19 8 9 | 47 Somers, CT 47 0.52 8 8 48 Shelton 48 76.03 3 13 | 48 Brien McMahon 48 0.52 4 10 49 Haddam-Killing 49 75.71 5 11 | 49 Shelton 49 0.51 3 13 50 Old Saybrook 50 75.02 0 14 | 50 East Lyme 50 0.51 17 1 51 Wheeler, CT 51 74.99 3 3 | 51 Haddam-Killing 51 0.51 5 11 52 Granby Memoria 52 74.62 1 8 | 52 Old Lyme 52 0.50 14 3 53 Suffield HS 53 74.61 5 11 | 53 Bethel 53 0.50 3 12 54 Bethel 54 74.60 3 12 | 54 Wilton 54 0.48 15 6 55 Notre Dame Cat 55 74.49 4 12 | 55 Ellington 55 0.48 3 12 56 Ellington 56 74.37 3 12 | 56 Suffield HS 56 0.47 5 11 57 Immaculate 57 74.36 1 15 | 57 Old Saybrook 57 0.47 0 14 58 Weston, CT 58 74.05 3 13 | 58 Mercy, CT 58 0.46 5 9 59 Old Lyme 59 73.91 14 3 | 59 Notre Dame Cat 59 0.45 4 12 60 Housatonic Val 60 73.41 1 9 | 60 Northwest Cath 60 0.42 14 4 61 Lauralton Hall 61 73.34 10 7 | 61 Granby Memoria 61 0.41 1 8 62 Pomperaug 62 73.10 11 7 | 62 Housatonic Val 62 0.38 1 9 63 Northwest Cath 63 70.76 14 4 | 63 Wheeler, CT 63 0.30 3 3 64 East Catholic 64 68.86 5 9 | 64 East Catholic 64 0.28 5 9