2005 girls Connecticut Strength of Schedule ARC
Based on Power Ratings Based on RPIRank Team SOS W L | Rank Team SOS W L Rnk Value | Rnk Value | 1 Wilton 1 89.56 19 3 | 1 Cheshire 1 0.75 14 6 2 Greenwich HS 2 89.10 16 4 | 2 Daniel Hand 2 0.75 16 4 3 South Windsor 3 88.73 10 6 | 3 Joel Barlow 3 0.72 12 7 4 Darien 4 88.15 11 7 | 4 Branford 4 0.70 17 2 5 Conard 5 87.93 5 9 | 5 Glastonbury 5 0.70 15 2 6 Cheshire 6 87.71 14 6 | 6 Hall, West Har 6 0.69 12 4 7 New Canaan 7 87.62 8 9 | 7 Wilton 7 0.69 19 3 8 Daniel Hand 8 87.15 16 4 | 8 Guilford, CT 8 0.69 11 7 9 Ridgefield 9 85.57 10 5 | 9 Ridgefield 9 0.68 10 5 10 Branford 10 85.39 17 2 | 10 New Fairfield 10 0.64 18 3 11 Windsor 11 85.30 2 14 | 11 Amity 11 0.64 2 13 12 Staples 12 85.02 2 15 | 12 Staples 12 0.64 2 15 13 Guilford, CT 13 85.00 11 7 | 13 Newtown 13 0.64 12 5 14 Glastonbury 14 84.77 15 2 | 14 Windsor 14 0.64 2 14 15 Hall, West Har 15 84.76 12 4 | 15 Danbury 15 0.64 11 6 16 Shelton 16 84.67 0 16 | 16 Southington 16 0.63 6 9 17 Southington 17 84.64 6 9 | 17 East Lyme 17 0.62 12 4 18 Simsbury 18 84.58 5 9 | 18 Somers 18 0.62 16 3 19 Amity 19 84.18 2 13 | 19 Conard 19 0.62 5 9 20 Norwalk 20 84.11 0 14 | 20 Sacred Heart, 20 0.62 10 8 21 Avon 21 83.64 10 5 | 21 Suffield HS 21 0.62 0 17 22 Suffield HS 22 83.56 0 17 | 22 Norwich Free A 22 0.61 12 4 23 St. Joseph, CT 23 83.40 6 10 | 23 Shelton 23 0.60 0 16 24 Brien McMahon 24 83.40 3 11 | 24 Stonington 24 0.60 11 7 25 Mercy, CT 25 83.16 12 7 | 25 Greenwich HS 25 0.60 16 4 26 Joel Barlow 26 82.98 12 7 | 26 West Haven 26 0.60 3 13 27 West Haven 27 82.97 3 13 | 27 St. Joseph, CT 27 0.60 6 10 28 Fairfield Ludl 28 82.14 7 8 | 28 Masuk 28 0.59 13 4 29 Sacred Heart, 29 81.91 10 8 | 29 Simsbury 29 0.59 5 9 30 Danbury 30 81.86 11 6 | 30 Newington 30 0.59 4 11 31 Trumbull 31 81.80 9 7 | 31 Fitch 31 0.59 8 7 32 Newington 32 81.76 4 11 | 32 Brien McMahon 32 0.58 3 11 33 Farmington 33 81.65 6 9 | 33 Brookfield 33 0.58 8 10 34 Hamden 34 81.60 9 8 | 34 Pomperaug 34 0.58 10 8 35 Fairfield Ward 35 81.29 9 7 | 35 South Windsor 35 0.58 10 6 36 Ledyard 36 81.04 0 12 | 36 Lyme-Old Lyme 36 0.58 15 4 37 North Branford 37 80.61 8 9 | 37 Fairfield Ludl 37 0.58 7 8 38 Woodstock Acad 38 80.24 5 11 | 38 Hamden 38 0.57 9 8 39 Newtown 39 80.10 12 5 | 39 Woodstock Acad 39 0.57 5 11 40 Housatonic Val 40 80.09 1 6 | 40 North Branford 40 0.57 8 9 41 East Lyme 41 79.98 12 4 | 41 St. Bernard, C 41 0.56 2 12 42 Old Saybrook 42 79.96 3 12 | 42 Trumbull 42 0.56 9 7 43 New Fairfield 43 79.81 18 3 | 43 Norwalk 43 0.55 0 14 44 Norwich Free A 44 79.75 12 4 | 44 Ledyard 44 0.54 0 12 45 St. Bernard, C 45 79.52 2 12 | 45 New Canaan 45 0.54 8 9 46 Somers 46 79.30 16 3 | 46 Laurelton Hall 46 0.53 7 9 47 Fitch 47 79.21 8 7 | 47 Avon 47 0.53 10 5 48 Stonington 48 79.04 11 7 | 48 Bethel 48 0.53 3 13 49 Lyme-Old Lyme 49 78.94 15 4 | 49 Notre Dame Cat 49 0.53 6 10 50 Brookfield 50 78.69 8 10 | 50 Weston, CT 50 0.53 2 14 51 New Milford 51 78.49 10 9 | 51 Darien 51 0.52 11 7 52 Haddam-Killing 52 78.46 6 8 | 52 Housatonic Val 52 0.52 1 6 53 Ellington 53 78.33 2 12 | 53 Farmington 53 0.51 6 9 54 Masuk 54 78.02 13 4 | 54 Northwest Cath 54 0.50 12 6 55 Northwest Cath 55 76.21 12 6 | 55 Fairfield Ward 55 0.49 9 7 56 Immaculate 56 76.16 1 14 | 56 Haddam-Killing 56 0.47 6 8 57 Weston, CT 57 75.73 2 14 | 57 Mercy, CT 57 0.47 12 7 58 Bethel 58 75.68 3 13 | 58 Ellington 58 0.46 2 12 59 Laurelton Hall 59 75.58 7 9 | 59 Old Saybrook 59 0.45 3 12 60 Pomperaug 60 75.37 10 8 | 60 Immaculate 60 0.43 1 14 61 Notre Dame Cat 61 74.66 6 10 | 61 New Milford 61 0.38 10 9