Windham
W-L: ( 5-11) PR = 89.0052Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 414 A Exeter HS (15- 5, 93.5) 5-18 418 H Manchester Central-Wes ( 4-12, 84.2) 20- 8 421 H Concord ( 2-14, 87.3) 6-14 422 H Hollis-Brookline ( 8-10, 88.5) 6- 5 424 A Bishop Guertin ( 8- 5, 94.9) 1-13 428 H Bedford ( 9- 6, 93.2) 11-17 430 H Nashua North ( 1-11, 85.5) 18- 6 507 A Salem ( 5-13, 88.1) 10- 8 513 H Portsmouth (18- 0, 99.9) 4-17 514 A Nashua South (14- 5, 93.2) 6-18 516 A Pinkerton Academy (15- 3, 95.7) 5- 7 519 H Souhegan (14- 4, 95.2) 12-18 521 A Londonderry ( 6-11, 91.3) 7-19 528 H Nashua South (14- 5, 93.2) 9-15 603 A Dover ( 7- 9, 88.5) 10- 5 605 A Portsmouth (18- 0, 99.9) 8-20
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
414 A Exeter HS 5-18 -13 -5 -0.37
418 H Manchester Central-Wes 20- 8 12 5 0.06
421 H Concord 6-14 -8 2 --- -6.85
422 H Hollis-Brookline 6- 5 1 1 0.30
424 A Bishop Guertin 1-13 -12 -6 0.00
428 H Bedford 11-17 -6 -4 -0.94
430 H Nashua North 18- 6 12 4 1.30
507 A Salem 10- 8 2 1 1.22
513 H Portsmouth 4-17 -13 -11 0.00
514 A Nashua South 6-18 -12 -4 -0.67
516 A Pinkerton Academy 5- 7 -2 -7 + 3.00
519 H Souhegan 12-18 -6 -6 0.00
521 A Londonderry 7-19 -12 -2 - -2.50
528 H Nashua South 9-15 -6 -4 -0.98
603 A Dover 10- 5 5 0 ++ 4.68
605 A Portsmouth 8-20 -12 -11 0.00
|
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 421 H Concord 6-14 -8 2 --- -6.85 521 A Londonderry 7-19 -12 -2 - -2.50 |
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 603 A Dover 10- 5 5 0 ++ 4.68 516 A Pinkerton Academy 5- 7 -2 -7 + 3.00 |
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alvirne | Windham | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Windham | |
| Bedford | Bedford | Bedford | ||
| Belmont | Windham | Windham | ||
| Bishop Brady | Windham | Windham | ||
| Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | ||
| Bow | Bow | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Bow | |
| Campbell | Windham | Windham | ||
| Coe-Brown | Windham | Windham | ||
| Concord | Concord | Concord | ||
| Concord Christian | Windham | Windham | ||
| ConVal | Windham | Windham | ||
| Derryfield | Derryfield | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Derryfield | |
| Dover | Windham | Windham | ||
| Exeter HS | Exeter HS | Exeter HS | ||
| Gilford | Gilford | Gilford | ||
| Goffstown | Windham | insuffient: ( 1- 3)( 0- 4) | Windham | |
| Hanover | Hanover | tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 2) | Hanover | |
| Hollis-Brookline | Windham | Windham | ||
| Hopkinton | Hopkinton | Hopkinton | ||
| Inter-Lakes-Moultonborou | Windham | Windham | ||
| John Stark | Windham | Windham | ||
| Kearsarge | Windham | Windham | ||
| Keene-Monadnock | Windham | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Windham | |
| Kennett | Windham | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Windham | |
| Kingswood | Windham | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Windham | |
| Laconia | Windham | Windham | ||
| Lebanon | Windham | Windham | ||
| Londonderry | Londonderry | Londonderry | ||
| Manchester Central-West | Windham | Windham | ||
| Manchester Memorial | Windham | Windham 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Merrimack | Merrimack | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Merrimack | |
| Merrimack Valley | Merrimack Valley | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Merrimack Valley | |
| Milford | Windham | Windham | ||
| Nashua North | Windham | Windham | ||
| Nashua South | Nashua South | Nashua South | ||
| Oyster River-Newmarket | Windham | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Windham | |
| Pelham | Windham | Windham | ||
| Pembroke Academy | Windham | Windham | ||
| Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Plymouth | Windham | Windham | ||
| Portsmouth | Portsmouth | Portsmouth | ||
| Salem | Windham | Windham | ||
| Souhegan | Souhegan | Souhegan | ||
| Spaulding | Windham | Windham 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | St Thomas Aquinas | |
| Timberlane | Windham | Windham 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| Trinity Manchester | Windham | Windham | ||
| Winnacunnet | Winnacunnet | Winnacunnet 4- 1 vs 1- 4 |
division Games Only
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Exeter HS (15- 5, 93.5) 5-18 -6.42 21.51 0.16 1.00 -6.25
0 H Manchester Cen ( 4-12, 84.2) 20- 8 -15.68 12.24 -0.16 1.00 12.06
0 H Concord ( 2-14, 87.3) 6-14 -12.58 15.34 -0.16 1.00 -12.71
0 H Hollis-Brookli ( 8-10, 88.5) 6- 5 -11.44 16.49 -0.16 1.00 16.29
0 A Bishop Guertin ( 8- 5, 94.9) 1-13 -4.97 22.95 0.16 1.00 -4.80
0 H Bedford ( 9- 6, 93.2) 11-17 -6.68 21.25 -0.16 1.00 -6.82
0 H Nashua North ( 1-11, 85.5) 18- 6 -14.43 13.49 -0.16 1.00 13.30
0 A Salem ( 5-13, 88.1) 10- 8 -11.83 16.10 0.16 1.00 16.21
0 H Portsmouth (18- 0, 99.9) 4-17 -0.00 27.93 -0.16 1.00 -0.16
0 A Nashua South (14- 5, 93.2) 6-18 -6.72 21.21 0.16 1.00 -6.55
0 A Pinkerton Acad (15- 3, 95.7) 5- 7 -4.17 23.76 0.16 1.00 -4.01
0 H Souhegan (14- 4, 95.2) 12-18 -4.68 23.25 -0.16 1.00 -4.82
0 A Londonderry ( 6-11, 91.3) 7-19 -8.55 19.37 0.16 1.00 -8.38
0 H Nashua South (14- 5, 93.2) 9-15 -6.72 21.21 -0.16 1.00 -6.86
0 A Dover ( 7- 9, 88.5) 10- 5 -11.38 16.55 0.16 1.00 16.66
0 A Portsmouth (18- 0, 99.9) 8-20 -0.00 27.93 0.16 1.00 -0.16
------
13.03
|
