2009 boys Washington II Strength of Schedule ARC

Based on Power Ratings Based on RPI
Rank Team SOS W L | Rank Team SOS W L Rnk Value | Rnk Value | 1 Nathan Hale 1 91.05 2 13 | 1 Nathan Hale 1 0.66 2 13 2 Wenatchee 2 90.40 1 11 | 2 Lake Tapps 2 0.65 13 3 3 Snohomish 3 90.03 8 8 | 3 Roosevelt 3 0.64 4 10 4 Roosevelt 4 89.66 4 10 | 4 Klahowya 4 0.63 7 7 5 Blanchet 5 89.03 7 7 | 5 Blanchet 5 0.63 7 7 6 Overlake 6 88.21 16 2 | 6 Sammamish 6 0.61 8 7 7 Redmond 7 88.10 14 2 | 7 Stadium-Wilson 7 0.61 11 4 8 Franklin 8 86.95 0 12 | 8 Stanwood 8 0.60 7 7 9 Highline 9 85.87 2 10 | 9 San Juan 9 0.56 8 5 10 Eastside Catho 10 84.76 17 2 | 10 Wenatchee 10 0.56 1 11 11 Sammamish 11 84.65 8 7 | 11 Redmond 11 0.56 14 2 12 Selah 12 84.56 4 8 | 12 Port Angeles 12 0.56 4 9 13 Lake Tapps 13 84.06 13 3 | 13 Franklin 13 0.55 0 12 14 Skagit Valley 14 83.92 0 12 | 14 Highline 14 0.55 2 10 15 North Kitsap 15 83.86 1 11 | 15 Selah 15 0.55 4 8 16 South Kitsap 16 83.74 1 11 | 16 Whatcom 16 0.54 6 7 17 Mukilteo 17 83.44 15 3 | 17 North County 17 0.54 2 11 18 Three Rivers 18 83.19 9 7 | 18 North Kitsap 18 0.54 1 11 19 North County 19 83.07 2 11 | 19 South Kitsap 19 0.54 1 11 20 Tacoma 20 82.98 10 7 | 20 Overlake 20 0.53 16 2 21 Klahowya 21 82.47 7 7 | 21 Skagit Valley 21 0.53 0 12 22 Stanwood 22 82.13 7 7 | 22 Mukilteo 22 0.52 15 3 23 Port Angeles 23 81.96 4 9 | 23 Lynnwood 23 0.51 11 6 24 Lynnwood 24 81.83 11 6 | 24 Eastside Catho 24 0.49 17 2 25 Whatcom 25 81.75 6 7 | 25 Tacoma 25 0.49 10 7 26 San Juan 26 81.74 8 5 | 26 Kings Way Chri 26 0.49 15 3 27 Stadium-Wilson 27 81.19 11 4 | 27 Three Rivers 27 0.45 9 7 28 Kings Way Chri 28 80.85 15 3 | 28 Snohomish 28 0.44 8 8