2009 boys Utah rpi

Switch to Power Rating Method

Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Explanation	Strength Of Schedule (SOS) Explanation	Quality Wins Factor(QWF) Explanation	Tournament Selection Explanation
Ratings Percentage Index (RPI) Print Version	Strength Of Schedule (SOS) Print Version	Quality Win Factor (QWF) Print Version	Champ & Selection Print Version

Rank	Team	RPI	SOS	QWF	Selection Sum
1	Jordan ( 12 - 2 )	2	1	1	4
2	Palo Verde ( 14 - 3 )	2	4	1	7
3	Bonanza ( 15 - 5 )	1	7	2	10
4	Bountiful ( 15 - 3 )	1	8	2	11
5	Timberline ( 21 - 4 )	1	13	1	15
6	Centennial ( 10 - 7 )	6	2	7	15
7	Copper Hills ( 14 - 2 )	4	7	5	16
8	Riverton ( 10 - 6 )	5	6	6	17
9	Bainbridge Island ( 14 - 4 )	3	11	3	17
10	Juan Diego Catholic ( 9 - 5 )	7	3	8	18
11	Curtis ( 12 - 6 )	4	12	4	20
12	Orem ( 11 - 5 )	8	2	11	21
13	Bingham ( 10 - 7 )	6	15	4	25
14	Skyline ( 11 - 9 )	7	13	7	27
15	West Jordan ( 10 - 5 )	11	5	13	29
16	Brighton ( 9 - 3 )	9	14	7	30
17	Judge Memorial ( 14 - 2 )	3	24	3	30
18	Alta ( 8 - 8 )	10	10	12	32
19	American Fork ( 14 - 3 )	12	11	10	33
20	Pleasant Grove ( 5 - 7 )	14	4	17	35
21	Sky View ( 13 - 2 )	13	19	9	41
22	Lincoln ( 19 - 5 )	3	44	3	50
23	Lone Peak ( 9 - 5 )	17	18	18	53
24	Viewmont ( 9 - 7 )	19	20	15	54
25	Skyline ( 7 - 8 )	18	16	23	57
26	Olympus ( 4 - 8 )	21	12	27	60
27	Park City ( 7 - 6 )	15	30	16	61
28	Lakeridge ( 14 - 9 )	9	45	8	62
29	Waterford ( 1 - 11 )	26	9	30	65
30	Weber ( 6 - 6 )	22	21	22	65
31	Box Elder ( 10 - 3 )	16	36	14	66
32	Mountain View ( 5 - 6 )	23	23	20	66
33	Bonneville ( 3 - 10 )	25	17	28	70
34	Lehi ( 5 - 8 )	28	13	32	73
35	Oakley ( 5 - 5 )	20	34	19	73
36	Fremont ( 8 - 5 )	24	33	21	78
37	East ( 5 - 8 )	30	22	31	83
38	Woods Cross ( 8 - 5 )	27	39	25	91
39	Northridge ( 4 - 8 )	31	27	34	92
40	Highland ( 7 - 6 )	29	38	26	93
41	Timpanogos ( 4 - 8 )	32	32	33	97
42	Logan ( 2 - 10 )	34	28	37	99
43	Pocatello ( 4 - 5 )	33	42	24	99