UPDATED: 04-28-26 08:46 PDT

boys Wells 1
  
Wells                 
W-L: ( 2- 0) PR = 93.4115

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 421 H Oak Hill ( 0- 3, 90.0) 8- 2 424 A Massabesic ( 2- 2, 90.7) 8- 7 428 H Lake Region ( 0- 0, 92.4) 501 H Noble/Sanford ( 3- 1, 93.9) 505 A Fryeburg Academy ( 1- 0, 97.4) 509 H Mount Ararat ( 1- 0, 96.2) 511 H Gray/New Gloucester/ ( 1- 1, 94.0) 515 A Lake Region ( 0- 0, 92.4) 519 A Traip Academy ( 0- 0, 92.4) 526 H North Yarmouth Acade ( 2- 0, 95.9) 529 H Marshwood ( 2- 0, 96.4) 601 A Greely ( 0- 2, 95.7)

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   421 H Oak Hill                8- 2       6     4           0.56
   424 A Massabesic              8- 7       1     2          -0.66

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

Wells PairWisePlus Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Bangor Wells   Wells
Biddeford Wells Wells   1- 0 vs 0- 1
Bonny Eagle Wells   Wells
Brewer Wells   Wells
Brunswick Wells   Wells
Camden Hills Regiona Wells   Wells
Cape Elizabeth Cape Elizabeth   Cape Elizabeth
Cheverus Wells   Wells
Cony Cony   Cony
Deering Deering   Deering
Edward Little Wells   Wells
Erskine Academy Erskine Academy tied -  1- 0 Erskine Academy
Falmouth Falmouth   Falmouth
Freeport Wells   Wells
Fryeburg Academy Fryeburg Academy   Fryeburg Academy
Gardiner Area Wells   Wells
Gorham Wells   Wells
Gray/New Gloucester/ Gray/New Gloucester/   Gray/New Gloucester/
Greely Greely   Greely
Hampden Academy Hampden Academy   Hampden Academy
Houlton/Hogdon Wells   Wells
John Bapst Memorial Wells   Wells
Kennebunk Wells   Wells
Lake Region Wells   Wells
Lawrence/Winslow Wells   Wells
Lewiston Lewiston   Lewiston
Lincoln Academy Wells   Wells
Maranacook-Winthrop Maranacook-Winthrop   Maranacook-Winthrop
Marshwood Marshwood   Marshwood
Massabesic Wells Wells  
MCI-Nokomis Wells   Wells
Messalonskee Messalonskee tied -  1- 0 Messalonskee
Morse/Boothbay Morse/Boothbay   Morse/Boothbay
Mount Ararat Mount Ararat   Mount Ararat
Mount Blue Mount Blue   Mount Blue
Noble/Sanford Noble/Sanford tied -  1- 0 Noble/Sanford
North Yarmouth Acade North Yarmouth Acade   North Yarmouth Acade
Oak Hill Wells Wells  
Oxford Hills Wells   Wells
Portland Wells   Wells
Scarborough Scarborough   Scarborough
South Portland South Portland   South Portland
Thornton Academy Thornton Academy   Thornton Academy
Traip Academy Wells   Wells
Waynflete School Wells   Wells
Westbrook Wells Wells   1- 0 vs 0- 1
Windham Wells   Wells
Yarmouth Yarmouth   Yarmouth
York York   York

PairWisePlus = 26


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 2.00

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 H Oak Hill        ( 0- 3, 90.0)     8- 2       -9.92       7.79      -1.00         1.00             6.79
   0 A Massabesic      ( 2- 2, 90.7)     8- 7       -9.15       8.56       1.00         1.00             9.56
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                        16.35

winning pts = 16.3498 losing points = 0.0000

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------