UPDATED: 04-04-26 09:08 PDT

boys Weber 1
  
Weber                 
W-L: ( 6- 2) PR = 91.0512

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 303 A Mountain Ridge ( 6- 2, 90.2) 12-14 305 A Riverton ( 6- 3, 90.1) 8- 9 310 H Skyline ( 2- 6, 86.2) 18- 5 317 H Woods Cross ( 1- 8, 83.9) 17- 6 319 H Fremont ( 2- 7, 82.4) 23- 4 323 H Ridgeline ( 4- 3, 88.4) 13- 7 326 H Pleasant Grove ( 8- 2, 88.6) 17- 6 327 A Salem Hills ( 2- 6, 82.6) 18- 6 407 H Layton ( 1- 5, 77.4) 409 A Farmington ( 5- 1, 96.3) 417 H Davis ( 5- 3, 88.1) 421 A Syracuse ( 6- 2, 85.3) 423 A Layton ( 1- 5, 77.4) 428 H Farmington ( 5- 1, 96.3) 501 A West Field ( 4- 4, 92.6) 505 A Davis ( 5- 3, 88.1) 507 H Syracuse ( 6- 2, 85.3)

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   303 A Mountain Ridge         12-14      -2     1    -     -2.61
   305 A Riverton                8- 9      -1     1          -1.73
   310 H Skyline                18- 5      13     5           0.00
   317 H Woods Cross            17- 6      11     7           0.00
   319 H Fremont                23- 4      19     9           0.00
   323 H Ridgeline              13- 7       6     3    +      2.08
   326 H Pleasant Grove         17- 6      11     3    +      2.32
   327 A Salem Hills            18- 6      12     8           0.00

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   303 A Mountain Ridge         12-14      -2     1    -     -2.61

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   323 H Ridgeline              13- 7       6     3    +      2.08
   326 H Pleasant Grove         17- 6      11     3    +      2.32

Weber Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Alta Alta tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Alta
American Fork Weber insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Weber
Bear River Weber insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Weber
Bingham Weber tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) Weber
Bonneville Weber insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Weber
Bountiful Bountiful   Bountiful
Box Elder Weber tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Weber
Brighton Brighton   Brighton
Canyon View Weber tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) Weber
Cedar Weber   Weber
Cedar Valley Weber Weber   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Clearfield Weber   Weber
Copper Hills Weber insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Weber
Corner Canyon Corner Canyon insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Corner Canyon
Crimson Cliffs Weber   Weber
Davis Weber tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) Weber
Desert Hills Weber   Weber
Dixie Weber   Weber
East Weber tied - ( 3- 0) ( 3- 0) Weber
Farmington Farmington tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) Farmington
Fremont Weber Weber  
Green Canyon Weber tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) Weber
Herriman Weber insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Weber
Highland Weber tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Weber
Hillcrest Weber   Weber
Hurricane Weber   Weber
Jordan Weber   Weber
Juan Diego Catholic Juan Diego Catholic tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Juan Diego Catholic
Judge Memorial Catho Judge Memorial Catho insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Judge Memorial Catho
Layton Weber   Weber
Lehi Weber insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) Weber
Logan Weber   Weber
Lone Peak Weber tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) Weber
Maple Mountain Weber tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Weber
Mountain Crest Weber   Weber
Mountain Ridge Mountain Ridge Mountain Ridge  
Mountain View Weber   Weber
Northridge Weber   Weber
Olympus Olympus   Olympus
Orem Weber Weber   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Park City Park City   Park City
Payson Weber tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) Weber
Pine View Weber   Weber
Pleasant Grove Weber Weber  
Provo Weber insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Weber
Ridgeline Weber Weber  
Riverton Riverton Riverton  
Roy Weber Weber   2- 1 vs 0- 3
Salem Hills Weber Weber  
Sky View Weber tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Weber
Skyline Weber Weber  
Skyridge Skyridge insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) Skyridge
Snow Canyon Weber insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Weber
Spanish Fork Weber   Weber
Springville Weber   Weber
Syracuse Weber tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Weber
Timpanogos Weber insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Weber
Timpview Weber tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Weber
Viewmont Weber   Weber
Wasatch Wasatch Wasatch   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Waterford Weber   Weber
West Weber   Weber
West Field West Field tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) West Field
West Jordan Weber Weber   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Westlake Weber   Weber
Woods Cross Weber Weber  

PowerWise = 52


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 8.36

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 A Mountain Ridge  ( 6- 2, 90.2)    12-14       -9.72      17.66       0.26         1.04            -9.88
   0 A Riverton        ( 6- 3, 90.1)     8- 9       -9.84      17.54       0.26         1.04           -10.01
   0 H Skyline         ( 2- 6, 86.2)    18- 5      -13.68      13.71      -0.26         1.04            14.05
   0 H Woods Cross     ( 1- 8, 83.9)    17- 6      -16.00      11.38      -0.26         1.04            11.62
   0 H Fremont         ( 2- 7, 82.4)    23- 4      -17.53       9.85      -0.26         1.04            10.02
   0 H Ridgeline       ( 4- 3, 88.4)    13- 7      -11.51      15.88      -0.26         1.04            16.31
   0 H Pleasant Grove  ( 8- 2, 88.6)    17- 6      -11.26      16.12      -0.26         1.04            16.57
   0 A Salem Hills     ( 2- 6, 82.6)    18- 6      -17.27      10.11       0.26         1.04            10.84
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                        59.51

winning pts = 79.4003 losing points = -19.8881

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------