UPDATED: 04-23-26 10:35 PDT

boys Windham 1
  
Windham               
W-L: ( 3- 1) PR = 93.7023

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 413 A Exeter HS ( 3- 0, 98.6) 4-18 415 A Nashua South ( 2- 3, 93.7) 12-11 417 H Manchester Memorial- ( 0- 4, 87.3) 17- 2 420 H Concord ( 2- 3, 89.9) 8- 5 423 A Bishop Guertin ( 2- 0, 96.8) 427 H Bedford ( 3- 0, 98.5) 429 H Nashua North ( 1- 3, 87.4) 504 A Nashua North ( 1- 3, 87.4) 506 H Salem ( 0- 4, 82.9) 508 H Merrimack ( 3- 1, 95.0) 511 A Dover ( 3- 2, 94.9) 512 A St Thomas Aquinas ( 1- 3, 88.5) 515 A Pinkerton Academy ( 4- 0, 99.9) 518 H Keene-Monadnock ( 1- 2, 84.4) 520 A Londonderry ( 1- 3, 92.0) 527 H Nashua South ( 2- 3, 93.7)

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   413 A Exeter HS               4-18     -14    -5          -0.10
   415 A Nashua South           12-11       1     0           1.06
   417 H Manchester Memorial-   17- 2      15     6           0.00
   420 H Concord                 8- 5       3     4          -0.88

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

Windham PairWisePlus Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Alvirne Windham   Windham
Bedford Bedford tied -  2- 0 Bedford
Bishop Brady Windham   Windham
Bishop Guertin Bishop Guertin tied -  1- 0 Bishop Guertin
Bow Bow   Bow
Campbell Windham   Windham
Coe-Brown Coe-Brown   Coe-Brown
Concord Windham Windham  
ConVal Windham   Windham
Derryfield Derryfield   Derryfield
Dover Dover   Dover
Exeter HS Exeter HS Exeter HS  
Gilford Windham   Windham
Goffstown Windham   Windham
Hanover Windham   Windham
Hollis-Brookline Windham Windham   1- 0 vs 0- 1
Hopkinton Windham   Windham
Inter-Lakes-Moultonb Windham   Windham
John Stark Windham   Windham
Kearsarge Windham   Windham
Keene-Monadnock Windham Windham   1- 0 vs 0- 1
Kennett Windham   Windham
Kingswood Windham   Windham
Laconia Windham   Windham
Lebanon Lebanon   Lebanon
Londonderry Windham   Windham
Manchester Memorial- Windham Windham  
Merrimack Merrimack   Merrimack
Merrimack Valley Windham   Windham
Milford Windham   Windham
Nashua North Windham   Windham
Nashua South Windham Windham  
Oyster River-Newmark Windham   Windham
Pelham Windham   Windham
Pembroke Academy Windham   Windham
Pinkerton Academy Pinkerton Academy tied -  1- 0 Pinkerton Academy
Plymouth Regional Plymouth Regional   Plymouth Regional
Portsmouth Portsmouth   Portsmouth
Salem Windham tied -  0- 1 Windham
Souhegan Windham   Windham
Spaulding Windham   Windham
St Thomas Aquinas Windham Windham   1- 0 vs 0- 1
Stevens Windham   Windham
Timberlane Timberlane   Timberlane
Trinity Manchester Windham   Windham
Winnacunnet Winnacunnet tied -  1- 0 Winnacunnet

PairWisePlus = 32


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 3.83

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 A Exeter HS       ( 3- 0, 98.6)     4-18       -1.35      17.38       0.04         0.96            -1.25
   0 A Nashua South    ( 2- 3, 93.7)    12-11       -6.18      12.55       0.04         0.96            12.05
   0 H Manchester Mem  ( 0- 4, 87.3)    17- 2      -12.61       6.12      -0.04         0.96             5.82
   0 H Concord         ( 2- 3, 89.9)     8- 5      -10.03       8.70      -0.04         0.96             8.29
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                        24.91

winning pts = 26.1573 losing points = -1.2455

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------