Truckee/North Tahoe
W-L: ( 4- 2) PR = 90.8970Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 226 A Damonte Ranch ( 1- 5, 76.1) 21- 0 303 A Spanish Springs ( 8- 3, 92.2) 14-18 306 H Reed ( 1- 8, 75.5) 18- 0 310 A Galena ( 4- 4, 87.8) 18- 9 317 A Bishop Manogue ( 5- 0, 95.5) 5-14 408 H Douglas ( 5- 4, 84.6) 12- 4 420 H Spanish Springs ( 8- 3, 92.2) 422 H Bishop Manogue ( 5- 0, 95.5) 424 H McQueen ( 1- 5, 79.4) 426 A Reno ( 4- 4, 80.6) 428 H Galena ( 4- 4, 87.8)
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
226 A Damonte Ranch 21- 0 21 14 0.00
303 A Spanish Springs 14-18 -4 -2 - -2.25
306 H Reed 18- 0 18 16 0.00
310 A Galena 18- 9 9 3 + 2.31
317 A Bishop Manogue 5-14 -9 -5 0.00
408 H Douglas 12- 4 8 7 0.00
|
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 303 A Spanish Springs 14-18 -4 -2 - -2.25 |
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 310 A Galena 18- 9 9 3 + 2.31 |
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bishop Gorman | Bishop Gorman | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Bishop Gorman | |
| Bishop Manogue | Bishop Manogue | Bishop Manogue | ||
| Centennial | Truckee/North Tahoe | Truckee/North Tahoe | ||
| Clark County | Truckee/North Tahoe | Truckee/North Tahoe | ||
| Coronado | Coronado | Coronado | ||
| Damonte Ranch | Truckee/North Tahoe | Truckee/North Tahoe | ||
| Douglas | Truckee/North Tahoe | Truckee/North Tahoe | ||
| Faith Lutheran | Faith Lutheran | Faith Lutheran | ||
| Foothill Hendersonvi | Truckee/North Tahoe | Truckee/North Tahoe | ||
| Galena | Truckee/North Tahoe | Truckee/North Tahoe | ||
| McQueen | Truckee/North Tahoe | Truckee/North Tahoe 3- 2 vs 1- 4 | ||
| Palo Verde | Palo Verde | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Palo Verde | |
| Reed | Truckee/North Tahoe | Truckee/North Tahoe | ||
| Reno | Truckee/North Tahoe | Truckee/North Tahoe 4- 1 vs 2- 3 | ||
| Spanish Springs | Spanish Springs | Spanish Springs |
division Games Only
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Damonte Ranch ( 1- 5, 76.1) 21- 0 -23.75 1.00 0.41 0.96 1.35
0 A Spanish Spring ( 8- 3, 92.2) 14-18 -7.67 16.78 0.41 0.96 -6.95
0 H Reed ( 1- 8, 75.5) 18- 0 -24.45 1.00 -0.41 0.96 0.56
0 A Galena ( 4- 4, 87.8) 18- 9 -12.10 12.35 0.41 0.96 12.23
0 A Bishop Manogue ( 5- 0, 95.5) 5-14 -4.37 20.08 0.41 0.96 -3.79
0 H Douglas ( 5- 4, 84.6) 12- 4 -15.25 9.20 -0.41 0.96 8.42
------
11.82
|