UPDATED: 04-23-26 10:35 PDT

boys Trinity Manchester 1
  
Trinity Manchester    
W-L: ( 1- 3) PR = 89.3561

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 413 A Pelham ( 2- 2, 90.0) 14-13 415 H ConVal ( 2- 1, 92.2) 3- 7 416 A Kennett ( 2- 1, 90.2) 4- 5 420 A Bow ( 4- 0, 93.7) 4-16 423 H Pelham ( 2- 2, 90.0) 424 A Plymouth Regional ( 4- 1, 95.8) 506 A Milford ( 1- 3, 85.9) 508 H Kennett ( 2- 1, 90.2) 511 A Coe-Brown ( 5- 0, 98.7) 515 H Hopkinton ( 2- 2, 91.1) 518 A Gilford ( 2- 2, 91.2) 520 H Lebanon ( 1- 1, 93.8) 521 A Stevens ( 0- 3, 81.2) 527 A Bishop Brady ( 1- 2, 89.5) 528 H Bishop Brady ( 1- 2, 89.5)

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   413 A Pelham                 14-13       1    -1           1.73
   415 H ConVal                  3- 7      -4    -3          -1.18
   416 A Kennett                 4- 5      -1    -1          -0.07
   420 A Bow                     4-16     -12    -4          -0.57

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

Trinity Manchester PairWisePlus Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Alvirne Trinity Manchester   Trinity Manchester
Bedford Bedford   Bedford
Bishop Brady Bishop Brady tied -  0- 1 Bishop Brady
Bishop Guertin Bishop Guertin   Bishop Guertin
Bow Bow Bow  
Campbell Campbell   Campbell
Coe-Brown Coe-Brown tied -  1- 0 Coe-Brown
Concord Concord   Concord
ConVal ConVal ConVal  
Derryfield Derryfield   Derryfield
Dover Dover   Dover
Exeter HS Exeter HS   Exeter HS
Gilford Gilford Gilford   1- 1 vs 0- 2
Goffstown Goffstown   Goffstown
Hanover Hanover   Hanover
Hollis-Brookline Hollis-Brookline   Hollis-Brookline
Hopkinton Hopkinton Hopkinton   1- 0 vs 0- 1
Inter-Lakes-Moultonb Inter-Lakes-Moultonb   Inter-Lakes-Moultonb
John Stark John Stark tied -  0- 1 John Stark
Kearsarge Trinity Manchester Trinity Manchester   1- 1 vs 0- 2
Keene-Monadnock Trinity Manchester   Trinity Manchester
Kennett Kennett Kennett  
Kingswood Kingswood   Kingswood
Laconia Laconia   Laconia
Lebanon Lebanon   Lebanon
Londonderry Londonderry   Londonderry
Manchester Memorial- Trinity Manchester   Trinity Manchester
Merrimack Merrimack   Merrimack
Merrimack Valley Trinity Manchester   Trinity Manchester
Milford Trinity Manchester Trinity Manchester   1- 0 vs 0- 1
Nashua North Trinity Manchester   Trinity Manchester
Nashua South Nashua South   Nashua South
Oyster River-Newmark Oyster River-Newmark   Oyster River-Newmark
Pelham Trinity Manchester Trinity Manchester  
Pembroke Academy Trinity Manchester   Trinity Manchester
Pinkerton Academy Pinkerton Academy   Pinkerton Academy
Plymouth Regional Plymouth Regional   Plymouth Regional
Portsmouth Portsmouth   Portsmouth
Salem Trinity Manchester   Trinity Manchester
Souhegan Souhegan   Souhegan
Spaulding Trinity Manchester   Trinity Manchester
St Thomas Aquinas Trinity Manchester   Trinity Manchester
Stevens Trinity Manchester tied -  0- 1 Trinity Manchester
Timberlane Timberlane   Timberlane
Windham Windham   Windham
Winnacunnet Winnacunnet   Winnacunnet

PairWisePlus = 13


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 3.83

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 A Pelham          ( 2- 2, 90.0)    14-13       -9.86       8.87       0.04         0.96             8.53
   0 H ConVal          ( 2- 1, 92.2)     3- 7       -7.68      11.05      -0.04         0.96            -7.40
   0 A Kennett         ( 2- 1, 90.2)     4- 5       -9.66       9.07       0.04         0.96            -9.21
   0 A Bow             ( 4- 0, 93.7)     4-16       -6.16      12.57       0.04         0.96            -5.85
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                       -13.92

winning pts = 8.5333 losing points = -22.4565

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------