Trinity Manchester
W-L: ( 3- 6) PR = 84.7343Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 413 A Pelham ( 6- 4, 85.5) 14-13 415 H ConVal ( 5- 4, 86.1) 3- 7 416 A Kennett ( 5- 3, 85.9) 4- 5 420 A Bow ( 8- 1, 88.2) 4-16 423 H Pelham ( 6- 4, 85.5) 9-10 424 A Plymouth Regional ( 9- 2, 88.0) 6-12 506 A Milford ( 1- 9, 80.8) 13- 4 508 H Kennett ( 5- 3, 85.9) 6- 5 511 A Coe-Brown (10- 0, 91.1) 0-13 512 H Bishop Brady ( 4- 3, 84.4) 515 H Hopkinton ( 6- 3, 85.6) 518 A Gilford ( 3- 6, 83.6) 520 H Lebanon ( 6- 1, 87.8) 521 A Stevens ( 0- 7, 78.7) 527 A Bishop Brady ( 4- 3, 84.4)
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
413 A Pelham 14-13 1 -1 + 2.13
415 H ConVal 3- 7 -4 -1 - -3.05
416 A Kennett 4- 5 -1 -2 0.57
420 A Bow 4-16 -12 -4 -1.09
423 H Pelham 9-10 -1 0 -0.66
424 A Plymouth Regional 6-12 -6 -4 -1.37
506 A Milford 13- 4 9 4 1.47
508 H Kennett 6- 5 1 -1 1.78
511 A Coe-Brown 0-13 -13 -7 0.00
|
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 415 H ConVal 3- 7 -4 -1 - -3.05 |
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 413 A Pelham 14-13 1 -1 + 2.13 |
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alvirne | Trinity Manchester | Trinity Manchester 1- 0 vs 0- 1 | ||
| Bedford | Bedford | Bedford | ||
| Bishop Brady | Bishop Brady | Bishop Brady 2- 1 vs 1- 2 | ||
| Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | ||
| Bow | Bow | Bow | ||
| Campbell | Trinity Manchester | Trinity Manchester 1- 4 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Coe-Brown | Coe-Brown | Coe-Brown | ||
| Concord | Concord | Concord | ||
| ConVal | ConVal | ConVal | ||
| Derryfield | Derryfield | Derryfield | ||
| Dover | Dover | Dover | ||
| Exeter HS | Exeter HS | Exeter HS | ||
| Gilford | Trinity Manchester | Trinity Manchester 3- 5 vs 2- 4 | ||
| Goffstown | Goffstown | Goffstown | ||
| Hanover | Hanover | Hanover | ||
| Hollis-Brookline | Trinity Manchester | Trinity Manchester | ||
| Hopkinton | Hopkinton | Hopkinton 1- 2 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Inter-Lakes-Moultonb | Inter-Lakes-Moultonb | Inter-Lakes-Moultonb | ||
| John Stark | Trinity Manchester | tied - 1- 2 | Trinity Manchester | |
| Kearsarge | Trinity Manchester | Trinity Manchester 1- 4 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Keene-Monadnock | Keene-Monadnock | Keene-Monadnock | ||
| Kennett | Kennett | Kennett 2- 1 vs 2- 2 | ||
| Kingswood | Kingswood | Kingswood | ||
| Laconia | Trinity Manchester | Trinity Manchester 2- 5 vs 0- 5 | ||
| Lebanon | Lebanon | Lebanon 3- 0 vs 1- 3 | ||
| Londonderry | Londonderry | Londonderry | ||
| Manchester Memorial- | Trinity Manchester | Trinity Manchester | ||
| Merrimack | Merrimack | Merrimack | ||
| Merrimack Valley | Trinity Manchester | Trinity Manchester | ||
| Milford | Trinity Manchester | Trinity Manchester | ||
| Nashua North | Nashua North | Nashua North | ||
| Nashua South | Nashua South | Nashua South | ||
| Oyster River-Newmark | Oyster River-Newmark | Oyster River-Newmark | ||
| Pelham | Trinity Manchester | Trinity Manchester 2- 2 vs 1- 2 | ||
| Pembroke Academy | Trinity Manchester | Trinity Manchester | ||
| Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Plymouth Regional | Plymouth Regional | Plymouth Regional | ||
| Portsmouth | Portsmouth | Portsmouth | ||
| Salem | Trinity Manchester | Trinity Manchester | ||
| Souhegan | Trinity Manchester | Trinity Manchester | ||
| Spaulding | Trinity Manchester | Trinity Manchester | ||
| St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Stevens | Trinity Manchester | Trinity Manchester 1- 4 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Timberlane | Timberlane | Timberlane | ||
| Windham | Windham | Windham | ||
| Winnacunnet | Winnacunnet | Winnacunnet |
division Games Only
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Pelham ( 6- 4, 85.5) 14-13 -14.43 9.96 0.40 1.04 10.77
0 H ConVal ( 5- 4, 86.1) 3- 7 -13.82 10.58 -0.40 1.04 -14.78
0 A Kennett ( 5- 3, 85.9) 4- 5 -13.99 10.40 0.40 1.04 -14.14
0 A Bow ( 8- 1, 88.2) 4-16 -11.65 12.74 0.40 1.04 -11.71
0 H Pelham ( 6- 4, 85.5) 9-10 -14.43 9.96 -0.40 1.04 -15.43
0 A Plymouth Regio ( 9- 2, 88.0) 6-12 -11.94 12.46 0.40 1.04 -12.00
0 A Milford ( 1- 9, 80.8) 13- 4 -19.09 5.31 0.40 1.04 5.93
0 H Kennett ( 5- 3, 85.9) 6- 5 -13.99 10.40 -0.40 1.04 10.41
0 A Coe-Brown (10- 0, 91.1) 0-13 -8.76 15.64 0.40 1.04 -8.70
------
-49.65
|