UPDATED: 04-29-26 08:54 PDT

boys Timberline 1
  
Timberline            
W-L: ( 5- 0) PR = 99.9000

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 312 H Kuna ( 3- 5, 89.1) 23- 3 326 H Mountain View ( 4- 5, 91.6) 12- 3 402 A Rocky Mountain ( 6- 1, 96.2) 10- 8 410 H Eagle ( 2- 6, 88.9) 15- 1 415 A Bishop Kelly ( 6- 2, 95.4) 13- 3 423 A Vallivue ( 1- 6, 86.2) 501 H Boise ( 4- 5, 91.0)

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   312 H Kuna                   23- 3      20    11           0.00
   326 H Mountain View          12- 3       9     9           0.00
   402 A Rocky Mountain         10- 8       2     3          -1.11
   410 H Eagle                  15- 1      14    12           0.00
   415 A Bishop Kelly           13- 3      10     4           1.12

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

Timberline PairWisePlus Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Ammon Timberline   Timberline
Bishop Kelly Timberline Timberline  
Boise Timberline Timberline   5- 0 vs 3- 2
Borah/Capital Timberline Timberline   1- 0 vs 0- 1
Centennial Timberline   Timberline
Chesterton of Notre Timberline   Timberline
Coeur d'Alene Timberline   Timberline
Eagle Timberline Timberline  
Emmett Timberline Timberline   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Idaho Falls Timberline   Timberline
Immaculate Conceptio Timberline   Timberline
Jackson Hole Timberline Timberline   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Kuna Timberline Timberline  
Lake City Timberline   Timberline
Logos Timberline   Timberline
Magic Valley Timberline   Timberline
Meridian Timberline tied -  3- 0 Timberline
Middleton Timberline Timberline   3- 0 vs 0- 3
Mountain View Timberline Timberline  
Owyhee Timberline Timberline   1- 0 vs 0- 1
Pocatello Timberline   Timberline
Rocky Mountain Timberline Timberline  
Sandpoint Timberline   Timberline
Spokane Timberline   Timberline
Spokane Valley Timberline   Timberline
Sun Valley Timberline   Timberline
Teton Valley Timberline   Timberline
Vallivue Timberline Timberline   3- 0 vs 1- 2
Gonzaga Prep Timberline   Timberline
Lewis & Clark Timberline   Timberline
Mead Timberline   Timberline
Mount Spokane Timberline   Timberline

PairWisePlus = 32


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 5.21

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 H Kuna            ( 3- 5, 89.1)    23- 3      -10.79       8.97      -0.58         1.04             8.75
   0 H Mountain View   ( 4- 5, 91.6)    12- 3       -8.26      11.51      -0.58         1.04            11.39
   0 A Rocky Mountain  ( 6- 1, 96.2)    10- 8       -3.69      16.08       0.58         1.04            17.37
   0 H Eagle           ( 2- 6, 88.9)    15- 1      -11.02       8.75      -0.58         1.04             8.51
   0 A Bishop Kelly    ( 6- 2, 95.4)    13- 3       -4.47      15.30       0.58         1.04            16.56
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                        62.57

winning pts = 62.5721 losing points = 0.0000

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------