UPDATED: 04-04-26 09:07 PDT

boys Sussex Tech 1
  
Sussex Tech           
W-L: ( 1- 3) PR = 88.2001

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 324 A Brandywine ( 3- 0, 91.3) 7- 9 326 H Newark Charter ( 3- 1, 92.2) 6-13 330 H Concord ( 0- 4, 84.2) 13- 6 401 H Caesar Rodney ( 1- 1, 94.0) 2-20 415 A Sussex Central ( 0- 3, 85.4) 417 H Cape Henlopen ( 2- 0, 98.9) 422 A Polytech ( 3- 1, 93.5) 424 H Smyrna ( 3- 1, 96.1) 428 A First State Military ( 2- 2, 88.5) 501 A Dover ( 2- 2, 90.3) 504 A Odessa ( 1- 3, 92.4) 508 A Milford ( 0- 4, 93.1) 511 A St Georges Tech ( 3- 1, 93.0) 515 H Woodbridge ( 1- 3, 87.6)

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   324 A Brandywine              7- 9      -2    -4    +      2.14
   326 H Newark Charter          6-13      -7    -3          -1.98
   330 H Concord                13- 6       7     5           0.02
   401 H Caesar Rodney           2-20     -18    -5          -0.18

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   324 A Brandywine              7- 9      -2    -4    +      2.14

Sussex Tech Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Alexis I du Pont Alexis I du Pont   Alexis I du Pont
Appoquinimink Appoquinimink   Appoquinimink
Archmere Academy Archmere Academy   Archmere Academy
Brandywine Brandywine Brandywine  
Caesar Rodney Caesar Rodney Caesar Rodney  
Cape Henlopen Cape Henlopen   Cape Henlopen
Caravel Academy Caravel Academy   Caravel Academy
Concord Sussex Tech Sussex Tech  
Conrad School Conrad School   Conrad School
Delaware Military Ac Sussex Tech tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Sussex Tech
Delcastle Sussex Tech   Sussex Tech
Delmar Delmar   Delmar
Dover Dover   Dover
First State Military First State Military   First State Military
Hodgson Vo-Tech Sussex Tech   Sussex Tech
Indian River Indian River   Indian River
McKean Sussex Tech   Sussex Tech
Middletown Middletown   Middletown
Milford Milford   Milford
Mount Pleasant Mount Pleasant   Mount Pleasant
Newark Charter Newark Charter Newark Charter  
Odessa Odessa tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Odessa
Polytech Polytech   Polytech
Red Lion Christian Red Lion Christian   Red Lion Christian
Salesianum School Salesianum School insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Salesianum School
Sanford School Sanford School   Sanford School
Smyrna Smyrna insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Smyrna
St Andrews School St Andrews School   St Andrews School
St Georges Tech St Georges Tech tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) St Georges Tech
St Marks St Marks   St Marks
Sussex Academy Sussex Academy   Sussex Academy
Sussex Central Sussex Tech   Sussex Tech
Tatnall School Tatnall School   Tatnall School
Tower Hill School Tower Hill School   Tower Hill School
Wilmington Charter Sussex Tech tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Sussex Tech
Wilmington Christian Wilmington Christian   Wilmington Christian
Wilmington Friends Wilmington Friends   Wilmington Friends
Woodbridge Sussex Tech   Sussex Tech

PowerWise = 8


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 2.82

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 A Brandywine      ( 3- 0, 91.3)     7- 9       -8.56      10.50       1.00         0.71            -5.33
   0 H Newark Charter  ( 3- 1, 92.2)     6-13       -7.68      11.38      -1.00         0.71            -6.12
   0 H Concord         ( 0- 4, 84.2)    13- 6      -15.68       3.38      -1.00         0.71             1.67
   0 H Caesar Rodney   ( 1- 1, 94.0)     2-20       -5.88      13.17      -1.00         0.71            -4.85
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                       -14.63

winning pts = 1.6747 losing points = -16.3038

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------