Spanish Springs
W-L: ( 8- 3) PR = 92.2339Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 228 H McQueen ( 1- 5, 79.4) 20- 0 303 H Truckee/North Tahoe ( 4- 2, 90.9) 18-14 306 A Bishop Gorman ( 4- 3, 94.9) 5-13 307 A Palo Verde ( 6- 0, 99.9) 6-19 311 H Douglas ( 5- 4, 84.6) 13- 1 313 H Bishop Manogue ( 5- 0, 95.5) 7-10 317 A Galena ( 4- 4, 87.8) 13-10 319 A Reno ( 4- 4, 80.6) 24- 2 325 A Reed ( 1- 8, 75.5) 27- 0 403 H Damonte Ranch ( 1- 5, 76.1) 21- 0 408 A Galena ( 4- 4, 87.8) 17- 4 420 A Truckee/North Tahoe ( 4- 2, 90.9) 429 A Bishop Manogue ( 5- 0, 95.5)
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
228 H McQueen 20- 0 20 13 0.00
303 H Truckee/North Tahoe 18-14 4 2 + 2.25
306 A Bishop Gorman 5-13 -8 -3 -1.96
307 A Palo Verde 6-19 -13 -8 0.00
311 H Douglas 13- 1 12 8 0.00
313 H Bishop Manogue 7-10 -3 -3 -0.12
317 A Galena 13-10 3 4 -1.02
319 A Reno 24- 2 22 11 0.00
325 A Reed 27- 0 27 16 0.00
403 H Damonte Ranch 21- 0 21 16 0.00
408 A Galena 17- 4 13 4 0.98
|
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* |
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 303 H Truckee/North Tahoe 18-14 4 2 + 2.25 |
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bishop Gorman | Bishop Gorman | Bishop Gorman | ||
| Bishop Manogue | Bishop Manogue | Bishop Manogue | ||
| Centennial | Spanish Springs | Spanish Springs | ||
| Clark County | Spanish Springs | tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) | Spanish Springs | |
| Coronado | Coronado | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Coronado | |
| Damonte Ranch | Spanish Springs | Spanish Springs | ||
| Douglas | Spanish Springs | Spanish Springs | ||
| Faith Lutheran | Faith Lutheran | insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) | Faith Lutheran | |
| Foothill Hendersonvi | Spanish Springs | tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) | Spanish Springs | |
| Galena | Spanish Springs | Spanish Springs | ||
| McQueen | Spanish Springs | Spanish Springs | ||
| Palo Verde | Palo Verde | Palo Verde | ||
| Reed | Spanish Springs | Spanish Springs | ||
| Reno | Spanish Springs | Spanish Springs | ||
| Truckee/North Tahoe | Spanish Springs | Spanish Springs |
division Games Only
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H McQueen ( 1- 5, 79.4) 20- 0 -20.52 3.93 -0.41 0.52 1.84
0 H Truckee/North ( 4- 2, 90.9) 18-14 -9.00 15.45 -0.41 0.52 7.86
0 A Bishop Gorman ( 4- 3, 94.9) 5-13 -5.04 19.41 0.41 0.52 -2.42
0 A Palo Verde ( 6- 0, 99.9) 6-19 -0.00 24.45 0.41 0.52 -0.22
0 H Douglas ( 5- 4, 84.6) 13- 1 -15.25 9.20 -0.41 0.52 4.59
0 H Bishop Manogue ( 5- 0, 95.5) 7-10 -4.37 20.08 -0.41 0.52 -2.50
0 A Galena ( 4- 4, 87.8) 13-10 -12.10 12.35 0.41 0.52 6.67
0 A Reno ( 4- 4, 80.6) 24- 2 -19.28 5.17 0.41 0.52 2.92
0 A Reed ( 1- 8, 75.5) 27- 0 -24.45 1.00 0.41 0.52 0.74
0 H Damonte Ranch ( 1- 5, 76.1) 21- 0 -23.75 1.00 -0.41 0.52 0.31
0 A Galena ( 4- 4, 87.8) 17- 4 -12.10 12.35 0.41 0.52 6.67
------
26.45
|