UPDATED: 04-29-26 08:54 PDT

boys Sandpoint 1
  
Sandpoint             
W-L: ( 1- 6) PR = 87.6913

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 316 A Mount Spokane ( 7- 2, 93.9) 5-14 319 A Immaculate Conceptio ( 0- 6, 85.7) 12- 9 324 A Gonzaga Prep ( 6- 2, 94.7) 7-17 327 H Spokane Valley ( 6- 1, 95.7) 5-12 407 A Coeur d'Alene ( 4- 3, 93.0) 1-12 409 H Logos ( 2- 5, 88.0) 7- 8 410 H Lake City ( 4- 2, 92.1) 5- 9 421 H Coeur d'Alene ( 4- 3, 93.0) 423 H Immaculate Conceptio ( 0- 6, 85.7) 425 A Spokane Valley ( 6- 1, 95.7) 430 A Lake City ( 4- 2, 92.1) 501 H Lewis & Clark ( 2- 4, 92.6) 502 A Logos ( 2- 5, 88.0)

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   316 A Mount Spokane           5-14      -9    -7           0.00
   319 A Immaculate Conceptio   12- 9       3     1           1.54
   324 A Gonzaga Prep            7-17     -10    -8           0.00
   327 H Spokane Valley          5-12      -7    -7           0.00
   407 A Coeur d'Alene           1-12     -11    -6           0.00
   409 H Logos                   7- 8      -1     0          -1.23
   410 H Lake City               5- 9      -4    -4          -0.21

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

Sandpoint PairWisePlus Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Ammon Ammon   Ammon
Bishop Kelly Bishop Kelly   Bishop Kelly
Boise Boise   Boise
Borah/Capital Borah/Capital   Borah/Capital
Centennial Centennial   Centennial
Chesterton of Notre Chesterton of Notre   Chesterton of Notre
Coeur d'Alene Coeur d'Alene Coeur d'Alene  
Eagle Eagle   Eagle
Emmett Sandpoint   Sandpoint
Idaho Falls Sandpoint   Sandpoint
Immaculate Conceptio Sandpoint Sandpoint  
Jackson Hole Jackson Hole   Jackson Hole
Kuna Kuna   Kuna
Lake City Lake City Lake City  
Logos Logos Logos  
Magic Valley Sandpoint   Sandpoint
Meridian Meridian   Meridian
Middleton Sandpoint   Sandpoint
Mountain View Mountain View   Mountain View
Owyhee Sandpoint   Sandpoint
Pocatello Pocatello tied -  0- 1 Pocatello
Rocky Mountain Rocky Mountain   Rocky Mountain
Spokane Spokane   Spokane
Spokane Valley Spokane Valley Spokane Valley  
Sun Valley Sandpoint   Sandpoint
Teton Valley Teton Valley   Teton Valley
Timberline Timberline   Timberline
Vallivue Sandpoint   Sandpoint
Gonzaga Prep Gonzaga Prep Gonzaga Prep  
Lewis & Clark Lewis & Clark Lewis & Clark   2- 4 vs 1- 5
Mead Mead   Mead
Mount Spokane Mount Spokane Mount Spokane  

PairWisePlus = 8


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 5.21

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 A Mount Spokane   ( 7- 2, 93.9)     5-14       -5.98      13.79       0.58         0.74            -4.02
   0 A Immaculate Con  ( 0- 6, 85.7)    12- 9      -14.25       5.52       0.58         0.74             4.54
   0 A Gonzaga Prep    ( 6- 2, 94.7)     7-17       -5.18      14.59       0.58         0.74            -3.42
   0 H Spokane Valley  ( 6- 1, 95.7)     5-12       -4.25      15.52      -0.58         0.74            -3.59
   0 A Coeur d'Alene   ( 4- 3, 93.0)     1-12       -6.89      12.88       0.58         0.74            -4.70
   0 H Logos           ( 2- 5, 88.0)     7- 8      -11.86       7.91      -0.58         0.74            -9.26
   0 H Lake City       ( 4- 2, 92.1)     5- 9       -7.83      11.93      -0.58         0.74            -6.27
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                       -26.72

winning pts = 4.5424 losing points = -31.2612

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------