Salem
W-L: ( 1-11) PR = 82.3421Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 413 H Pinkerton Academy ( 8- 0, 99.5) 1-22 417 H Keene-Monadnock ( 3- 6, 86.2) 13-14 420 A Exeter HS ( 8- 2, 96.6) 3-16 422 H Nashua North ( 3- 9, 86.5) 14-20 424 H Londonderry ( 5- 5, 91.8) 3-17 427 A Nashua South ( 7- 5, 88.9) 8-23 428 H Manchester Memorial- ( 1- 8, 82.3) 11-15 501 A Bishop Guertin ( 7- 1, 99.9) 0-24 506 A Windham ( 7- 5, 90.8) 6-18 508 A Concord ( 4- 7, 89.6) 3-11 511 A Manchester Memorial- ( 1- 8, 82.3) 8- 5 513 A Nashua South ( 7- 5, 88.9) 3-14 515 H Bedford ( 7- 1, 97.5) 518 A Nashua North ( 3- 9, 86.5) 520 H Merrimack ( 6- 4, 90.6) 527 A Dover ( 6- 4, 92.8)
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
413 H Pinkerton Academy 1-22 -21 -17 0.00
417 H Keene-Monadnock 13-14 -1 -3 + 2.46
420 A Exeter HS 3-16 -13 -15 0.00
422 H Nashua North 14-20 -6 -4 -1.27
424 H Londonderry 3-17 -14 -9 0.00
427 A Nashua South 8-23 -15 -7 0.00
428 H Manchester Memorial- 11-15 -4 0 -- -4.45
501 A Bishop Guertin 0-24 -24 -18 0.00
506 A Windham 6-18 -12 -9 0.00
508 A Concord 3-11 -8 -8 0.00
511 A Manchester Memorial- 8- 5 3 0 + 3.35
513 A Nashua South 3-14 -11 -7 0.00
|
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 428 H Manchester Memorial- 11-15 -4 0 -- -4.45 |
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 417 H Keene-Monadnock 13-14 -1 -3 + 2.46 511 A Manchester Memorial- 8- 5 3 0 + 3.35 |
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alvirne | Salem | tied - 0- 1 | Salem | |
| Bedford | Bedford | Bedford 7- 1 vs 1- 8 | ||
| Bishop Brady | Bishop Brady | Bishop Brady | ||
| Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | ||
| Bow | Bow | Bow | ||
| Campbell | Campbell | Campbell | ||
| Coe-Brown | Coe-Brown | Coe-Brown | ||
| Concord | Concord | Concord | ||
| ConVal | ConVal | ConVal | ||
| Derryfield | Derryfield | Derryfield 1- 0 vs 0- 1 | ||
| Dover | Dover | Dover 3- 3 vs 0- 6 | ||
| Exeter HS | Exeter HS | Exeter HS | ||
| Gilford | Gilford | Gilford | ||
| Goffstown | Goffstown | Goffstown | ||
| Hanover | Hanover | Hanover | ||
| Hollis-Brookline | Hollis-Brookline | tied - 0- 2 | Hollis-Brookline | |
| Hopkinton | Hopkinton | Hopkinton | ||
| Inter-Lakes-Moultonb | Inter-Lakes-Moultonb | Inter-Lakes-Moultonb | ||
| John Stark | John Stark | John Stark 1- 0 vs 1- 1 | ||
| Kearsarge | Kearsarge | Kearsarge | ||
| Keene-Monadnock | Keene-Monadnock | Keene-Monadnock | ||
| Kennett | Kennett | Kennett | ||
| Kingswood | Kingswood | Kingswood | ||
| Laconia | Laconia | Laconia | ||
| Lebanon | Lebanon | Lebanon | ||
| Londonderry | Londonderry | Londonderry | ||
| Manchester Memorial- | Salem | tied - 0- 5 | Salem | |
| Merrimack | Merrimack | Merrimack 4- 4 vs 0- 8 | ||
| Merrimack Valley | Salem | Salem | ||
| Milford | Salem | Salem | ||
| Nashua North | Nashua North | Nashua North | ||
| Nashua South | Nashua South | Nashua South | ||
| Oyster River-Newmark | Oyster River-Newmark | Oyster River-Newmark | ||
| Pelham | Pelham | Pelham | ||
| Pembroke Academy | Salem | Salem | ||
| Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Plymouth Regional | Plymouth Regional | Plymouth Regional | ||
| Portsmouth | Portsmouth | tied - 0- 1 | Portsmouth | |
| Souhegan | Souhegan | Souhegan | ||
| Spaulding | Salem | Salem | ||
| St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas 1- 1 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Stevens | Salem | Salem | ||
| Timberlane | Timberlane | Timberlane | ||
| Trinity Manchester | Trinity Manchester | Trinity Manchester | ||
| Windham | Windham | Windham | ||
| Winnacunnet | Winnacunnet | Winnacunnet 1- 0 vs 0- 1 |
division Games Only
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H Pinkerton Acad ( 8- 0, 99.5) 1-22 -0.42 23.97 -0.40 0.78 -0.64
0 H Keene-Monadnoc ( 3- 6, 86.2) 13-14 -13.70 10.69 -0.40 0.78 -11.00
0 A Exeter HS ( 8- 2, 96.6) 3-16 -3.30 21.10 0.40 0.78 -2.26
0 H Nashua North ( 3- 9, 86.5) 14-20 -13.44 10.96 -0.40 0.78 -10.79
0 H Londonderry ( 5- 5, 91.8) 3-17 -8.12 16.27 -0.40 0.78 -6.65
0 A Nashua South ( 7- 5, 88.9) 8-23 -11.04 13.36 0.40 0.78 -8.30
0 H Manchester Mem ( 1- 8, 82.3) 11-15 -17.61 6.79 -0.40 0.78 -14.04
0 A Bishop Guertin ( 7- 1, 99.9) 0-24 -0.00 24.39 0.40 0.78 -0.31
0 A Windham ( 7- 5, 90.8) 6-18 -9.06 15.33 0.40 0.78 -6.76
0 A Concord ( 4- 7, 89.6) 3-11 -10.29 14.10 0.40 0.78 -7.72
0 A Manchester Mem ( 1- 8, 82.3) 8- 5 -17.61 6.79 0.40 0.78 5.60
0 A Nashua South ( 7- 5, 88.9) 3-14 -11.04 13.36 0.40 0.78 -8.30
------
-71.17
|