UPDATED: 04-05-26 08:40 PDT

boys River Bluff 1
  
River Bluff           
W-L: ( 9- 1) PR = 89.8920

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 223 H AC Flora ( 7- 2, 88.2) 12- 7 228 H Spartanburg (10- 2, 89.4) 13-10 302 A Dutch Fork ( 4-10, 83.5) 13- 6 305 H Spring Valley ( 2- 9, 80.4) 21- 2 310 A Hammond School ( 2- 4, 84.8) 14- 3 319 H Chapin ( 9- 1, 93.1) 14-21 326 A Blythewood ( 8- 5, 84.2) 18- 1 328 A Aiken ( 0- 6, 72.8) 26- 0 330 A White Knoll ( 3-10, 79.9) 17- 3 401 H Lexington ( 5- 6, 85.7) 11- 9 410 A May River ( 7- 1, 86.6) 416 H James Island Charter ( 7- 5, 86.2) 420 H Philip Simmons ( 0- 9, 77.0) 422 A Clover ( 6- 2, 91.0)

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   223 H AC Flora               12- 7       5     2    +      2.73
   228 H Spartanburg            13-10       3     1           1.92
   302 A Dutch Fork             13- 6       7     6           0.00
   305 H Spring Valley          21- 2      19    10           0.00
   310 A Hammond School         14- 3      11     5           0.48
   319 H Chapin                 14-21      -7    -3    -     -2.35
   326 A Blythewood             18- 1      17     5           0.00
   328 A Aiken                  26- 0      26    17           0.00
   330 A White Knoll            17- 3      14     9           0.00
   401 H Lexington              11- 9       2     5    -     -2.73

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   319 H Chapin                 14-21      -7    -3    -     -2.35
   401 H Lexington              11- 9       2     5    -     -2.73

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   223 H AC Flora               12- 7       5     2    +      2.73

River Bluff Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
AC Flora River Bluff River Bluff  
Academic Magnet Char River Bluff   River Bluff
Aiken River Bluff River Bluff  
Atlantic Collegiate River Bluff   River Bluff
Beaufort River Bluff   River Bluff
Bishop England River Bluff   River Bluff
Bluffton River Bluff   River Bluff
Blythewood River Bluff River Bluff  
Boiling Springs River Bluff insuffient: ( 4- 0)( 3- 1) River Bluff
Byrnes River Bluff insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) River Bluff
Camden Military Acad River Bluff River Bluff   5- 0 vs 1- 4
Carolina Forest River Bluff   River Bluff
Catawba Ridge River Bluff River Bluff   3- 0 vs 0- 3
Chapin Chapin Chapin  
Christ Church Episco River Bluff insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) River Bluff
Clover Clover tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) Clover
Dorman Dorman   Dorman
Dutch Fork River Bluff River Bluff  
Eastside River Bluff insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) River Bluff
Fort Mill River Bluff tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) River Bluff
Fox Creek River Bluff tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) River Bluff
Gilbert River Bluff insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) River Bluff
Greenville River Bluff tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) River Bluff
Hammond School River Bluff River Bluff  
Heathwood Hall River Bluff River Bluff   5- 0 vs 3- 2
Hillcrest River Bluff River Bluff   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Hilton Head River Bluff   River Bluff
Hilton Head Christia River Bluff   River Bluff
James Island Charter River Bluff   River Bluff
JL Mann Academy River Bluff River Bluff   4- 0 vs 1- 3
Laurence Manning Aca River Bluff tied - ( 3- 0) ( 3- 0) River Bluff
Legion Collegiate Ac River Bluff tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) River Bluff
Lexington River Bluff River Bluff  
Lucy Beckham Lucy Beckham   Lucy Beckham
Mauldin River Bluff insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) River Bluff
May River River Bluff tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) River Bluff
Myrtle Beach River Bluff   River Bluff
Nation Ford River Bluff tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) River Bluff
North Myrtle Beach River Bluff   River Bluff
Oceanside Academy Oceanside Academy tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Oceanside Academy
Philip Simmons River Bluff insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) River Bluff
Porter-Gaud River Bluff   River Bluff
Riverside River Bluff insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) River Bluff
Socastee River Bluff   River Bluff
Spartanburg River Bluff River Bluff  
Spring Valley River Bluff River Bluff  
St James River Bluff tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) River Bluff
St Joseph Catholic River Bluff   River Bluff
TL Hanna River Bluff insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) River Bluff
Trinity Collegiate River Bluff tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) River Bluff
Waccamaw River Bluff   River Bluff
Wade Hampton River Bluff tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) River Bluff
Wando Wando insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Wando
Westside River Bluff River Bluff   2- 0 vs 0- 2
White Knoll River Bluff River Bluff  
Woodmont River Bluff   River Bluff

PowerWise = 50


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 8.14

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 H AC Flora        ( 7- 2, 88.2)    12- 7      -11.73      16.83      -0.55         0.81            13.25
   0 H Spartanburg     (10- 2, 89.4)    13-10      -10.54      18.01      -0.55         0.81            14.22
   0 A Dutch Fork      ( 4-10, 83.5)    13- 6      -16.38      12.17       0.55         0.81            10.36
   0 H Spring Valley   ( 2- 9, 80.4)    21- 2      -19.49       9.07      -0.55         0.81             6.93
   0 A Hammond School  ( 2- 4, 84.8)    14- 3      -15.07      13.48       0.55         0.81            11.42
   0 H Chapin          ( 9- 1, 93.1)    14-21       -6.81      21.75      -0.55         0.81            -5.99
   0 A Blythewood      ( 8- 5, 84.2)    18- 1      -15.69      12.87       0.55         0.81            10.92
   0 A Aiken           ( 0- 6, 72.8)    26- 0      -27.14       1.42       0.55         0.81             1.60
   0 A White Knoll     ( 3-10, 79.9)    17- 3      -19.99       8.56       0.55         0.81             7.41
   0 H Lexington       ( 5- 6, 85.7)    11- 9      -14.19      14.37      -0.55         0.81            11.25
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                        81.37

winning pts = 87.3638 losing points = -5.9888

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------