UPDATED: 05-28-26 10:01 PDT

boys Rogers 1
  
Rogers                
W-L: ( 3- 4) PR = 79.1834

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 401 A Narragansett (13- 5, 83.0) 3-11 409 A Narragansett (13- 5, 83.0) 3- 9 414 H Ponaganset ( 5- 7, 76.8) 5- 4 416 A Scituate (14- 1, 84.3) 1-12 507 A North Providence ( 1- 8, 73.9) 15- 4 512 A Ponaganset ( 5- 7, 76.8) 11- 6 519 H Scituate (14- 1, 84.3) 1-10 602 H Ponaganset ( 5- 7, 76.8)

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   401 A Narragansett            3-11      -8    -4          -0.64
   409 A Narragansett            3- 9      -6    -4          -0.64
   414 H Ponaganset              5- 4       1     3          -1.87
   416 A Scituate                1-12     -11    -6           0.00
   507 A North Providence       15- 4      11     5           0.26
   512 A Ponaganset             11- 6       5     2    +      3.19
   519 H Scituate                1-10      -9    -5          -0.37

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   512 A Ponaganset             11- 6       5     2    +      3.19

Rogers PairWisePlus Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Barrington Barrington   Barrington
Bishop Hendricken Bishop Hendricken   Bishop Hendricken
Burrillville Rogers tied -  1- 2 Rogers
Chariho Rogers   Rogers
Classical Classical   Classical
Coventry Rogers tied -  0- 2 Rogers
Cranston East Rogers   Rogers
Cranston West Rogers   Rogers
Cumberland Cumberland Cumberland   1- 0 vs 0- 1
East Greenwich East Greenwich   East Greenwich
East Providence East Providence   East Providence
La Salle Academy La Salle Academy   La Salle Academy
Lincoln Lincoln tied -  2- 1 Lincoln
Middletown Middletown   Middletown
Moses Brown School Moses Brown School   Moses Brown School
Mount Hope Mount Hope Mount Hope   1- 0 vs 0- 1
Narragansett Narragansett Narragansett  
North Kingstown North Kingstown   North Kingstown
North Providence Rogers Rogers  
North Smithfield North Smithfield tied -  2- 2 North Smithfield
Pilgrim Pilgrim Pilgrim   1- 0 vs 0- 1
Ponaganset Rogers Rogers  
Portsmouth Portsmouth   Portsmouth
Prout/Exeter-West Gr Prout/Exeter-West Gr tied -  0- 1 Prout/Exeter-West Gr
Providence CDS-St Ra Providence CDS-St Ra tied -  0- 2 Providence CDS-St Ra
Scituate Scituate Scituate  
Smithfield Smithfield   Smithfield
South Kingstown South Kingstown   South Kingstown
Tiverton Rogers Rogers   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Toll Gate Rogers tied -  1- 2 Rogers
Westerly Westerly   Westerly

PairWisePlus = 9


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 11.38

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 A Narragansett    (13- 5, 83.0)     3-11      -16.89      17.57       0.53         1.62           -26.58
   0 A Narragansett    (13- 5, 83.0)     3- 9      -16.89      17.57       0.53         1.62           -26.58
   0 H Ponaganset      ( 5- 7, 76.8)     5- 4      -23.06      11.41      -0.53         1.62            17.67
   0 A Scituate        (14- 1, 84.3)     1-12      -15.55      18.91       0.53         1.62           -24.41
   0 A North Providen  ( 1- 8, 73.9)    15- 4      -25.99       8.47       0.53         1.62            14.64
   0 A Ponaganset      ( 5- 7, 76.8)    11- 6      -23.06      11.41       0.53         1.62            19.41
   0 H Scituate        (14- 1, 84.3)     1-10      -15.55      18.91      -0.53         1.62           -26.14
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                       -51.99

winning pts = 51.7144 losing points = -103.7081

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------