UPDATED: 04-29-26 08:54 PDT

boys Rocky Mountain 1
  
Rocky Mountain        
W-L: ( 6- 1) PR = 96.2095

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 303 A Emmett ( 2- 5, 85.6) 24- 0 313 A Eagle ( 2- 6, 88.9) 17- 4 325 A Bishop Kelly ( 6- 2, 95.4) 12-11 402 H Timberline ( 5- 0, 99.9) 8-10 405 H Jackson Hole ( 5- 2, 93.5) 8- 7 409 A Boise ( 4- 5, 91.0) 8- 3 414 H Kuna ( 3- 5, 89.1) 422 H Mountain View ( 4- 5, 91.6) 17- 9 430 H Vallivue ( 1- 6, 86.2)

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   303 A Emmett                 24- 0      24    10           0.00
   313 A Eagle                  17- 4      13     7           0.00
   325 A Bishop Kelly           12-11       1     0           0.81
   402 H Timberline              8-10      -2    -3           1.11
   405 H Jackson Hole            8- 7       1     3    -     -2.25
   409 A Boise                   8- 3       5     5           0.34
   422 H Mountain View          17- 9       8     5           0.00

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   405 H Jackson Hole            8- 7       1     3    -     -2.25

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

Rocky Mountain PairWisePlus Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Ammon Rocky Mountain   Rocky Mountain
Bishop Kelly Rocky Mountain Rocky Mountain  
Boise Rocky Mountain Rocky Mountain  
Borah/Capital Rocky Mountain Rocky Mountain   3- 0 vs 1- 2
Centennial Rocky Mountain   Rocky Mountain
Chesterton of Notre Rocky Mountain   Rocky Mountain
Coeur d'Alene Rocky Mountain   Rocky Mountain
Eagle Rocky Mountain Rocky Mountain  
Emmett Rocky Mountain Rocky Mountain  
Idaho Falls Rocky Mountain Rocky Mountain   1- 0 vs 0- 1
Immaculate Conceptio Rocky Mountain   Rocky Mountain
Jackson Hole Rocky Mountain Rocky Mountain  
Kuna Rocky Mountain Rocky Mountain   4- 1 vs 1- 4
Lake City Rocky Mountain   Rocky Mountain
Logos Rocky Mountain   Rocky Mountain
Magic Valley Rocky Mountain Rocky Mountain   1- 0 vs 0- 1
Meridian Rocky Mountain tied -  4- 0 Rocky Mountain
Middleton Rocky Mountain Rocky Mountain   3- 0 vs 0- 3
Mountain View Rocky Mountain Rocky Mountain  
Owyhee Rocky Mountain tied -  1- 0 Rocky Mountain
Pocatello Rocky Mountain Rocky Mountain   1- 0 vs 0- 1
Sandpoint Rocky Mountain   Rocky Mountain
Spokane Rocky Mountain   Rocky Mountain
Spokane Valley Rocky Mountain   Rocky Mountain
Sun Valley Rocky Mountain Rocky Mountain   1- 0 vs 0- 1
Teton Valley Rocky Mountain   Rocky Mountain
Timberline Timberline Timberline  
Vallivue Rocky Mountain Rocky Mountain   4- 0 vs 1- 3
Gonzaga Prep Rocky Mountain   Rocky Mountain
Lewis & Clark Rocky Mountain   Rocky Mountain
Mead Rocky Mountain   Rocky Mountain
Mount Spokane Rocky Mountain   Rocky Mountain

PairWisePlus = 31


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 5.21

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 A Emmett          ( 2- 5, 85.6)    24- 0      -14.29       5.48       0.58         0.74             4.51
   0 A Eagle           ( 2- 6, 88.9)    17- 4      -11.02       8.75       0.58         0.74             6.94
   0 A Bishop Kelly    ( 6- 2, 95.4)    12-11       -4.47      15.30       0.58         0.74            11.83
   0 H Timberline      ( 5- 0, 99.9)     8-10       -0.00      19.77      -0.58         0.74            -0.43
   0 H Jackson Hole    ( 5- 2, 93.5)     8- 7       -6.36      13.40      -0.58         0.74             9.55
   0 A Boise           ( 4- 5, 91.0)     8- 3       -8.93      10.84       0.58         0.74             8.50
   0 H Mountain View   ( 4- 5, 91.6)    17- 9       -8.26      11.51      -0.58         0.74             8.13
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                        49.03

winning pts = 49.4663 losing points = -0.4329

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------