UPDATED: 04-05-26 08:40 PDT

boys Roseburg 1
  
Roseburg              
W-L: ( 2- 1) PR = 93.4249

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 317 H Mountain View ( 3- 0, 95.3) 10-11 319 A Newberg ( 1- 3, 90.8) 13-11 331 A Hillsboro ( 1- 2, 81.7) 18- 3 404 H Westview ( 2- 1, 85.9) 407 H Marist ( 2- 1, 92.1) 410 A Sheldon ( 1- 2, 87.5) 414 H Thurston ( 1- 1, 86.0) 417 H Clackamas/Nelson ( 0- 1, 90.0) 421 A South Eugene ( 4- 0, 91.6) 424 A Marist ( 2- 1, 92.1) 428 H Sheldon ( 1- 2, 87.5) 501 A Thurston ( 1- 1, 86.0) 508 H South Eugene ( 4- 0, 91.6)

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   317 H Mountain View          10-11      -1    -1          -0.16
   319 A Newberg                13-11       2     2           0.36
   331 A Hillsboro              18- 3      15    11           0.00

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

Roseburg Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Aloha/Southridge Roseburg tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Roseburg
Beaverton Roseburg   Roseburg
Bend/Caldera Bend/Caldera tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Bend/Caldera
Burns Roseburg   Roseburg
Canby Roseburg   Roseburg
Central Catholic Roseburg   Roseburg
Century Roseburg   Roseburg
Clackamas/Nelson Roseburg   Roseburg
Corvallis Roseburg insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Roseburg
Forest Grove Forest Grove   Forest Grove
Glencoe Roseburg   Roseburg
Grant/Central Eastsi Grant/Central Eastsi tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Grant/Central Eastsi
Hillsboro Roseburg Roseburg  
Hood River Hood River   Hood River
Ida B Wells Roseburg   Roseburg
Jesuit Portland Jesuit Portland   Jesuit Portland
Lake Oswego/Riverdal Lake Oswego/Riverdal tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Lake Oswego/Riverdal
Lakeridge Lakeridge   Lakeridge
Liberty Roseburg   Roseburg
Lincoln Roseburg   Roseburg
Marist Roseburg tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Roseburg
Mountain View Mountain View Mountain View  
Mountainside Roseburg   Roseburg
Newberg Roseburg Roseburg  
Oregon City Roseburg   Roseburg
Oregon Episcopal Roseburg   Roseburg
Ridgeview Roseburg   Roseburg
Sheldon Roseburg   Roseburg
Sherwood Roseburg   Roseburg
South Eugene Roseburg   Roseburg
Sprague/South Salem Roseburg insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Roseburg
Summit Roseburg   Roseburg
Sunset Roseburg   Roseburg
Thurston Roseburg   Roseburg
Tigard Roseburg   Roseburg
Tualatin Roseburg   Roseburg
West Albany Roseburg   Roseburg
West Linn West Linn   West Linn
West Salem/McNary Roseburg   Roseburg
Westview Roseburg   Roseburg
Wilsonville Wilsonville   Wilsonville

PowerWise = 31


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 2.90

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 H Mountain View   ( 3- 0, 95.3)    10-11       -4.63      13.59      -1.00         0.97            -5.45
   0 A Newberg         ( 1- 3, 90.8)    13-11       -9.11       9.11       1.00         0.97             9.79
   0 A Hillsboro       ( 1- 2, 81.7)    18- 3      -18.22       1.00       1.00         0.97             1.94
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                         6.27

winning pts = 11.7236 losing points = -5.4522

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------