UPDATED: 04-07-26 18:12 PDT

boys Portsmouth 1
  
Portsmouth            
W-L: ( 3- 0) PR = 99.9000

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 326 A Bishop Hendricken ( 1- 2, 95.3) 8- 5 331 H Pilgrim ( 3- 1, 98.6) 6- 3 401 A Toll Gate ( 0- 2, 89.2) 19- 1 407 H Westerly ( 1- 0, 99.1) 414 H Chariho ( 0- 3, 88.9) 415 H Barrington ( 2- 0, 94.9) 416 H Toll Gate ( 0- 2, 89.2) 421 A Prout/Exeter-West Gr ( 0- 1, 91.2) 423 A Cranston West ( 0- 1, 93.1) 428 H Smithfield ( 0- 3, 89.1) 430 A East Greenwich ( 1- 0, 94.4) 506 A Chariho ( 0- 3, 88.9) 508 A Middletown ( 1- 1, 93.1) 511 H Cranston West ( 0- 1, 93.1) 514 H East Greenwich ( 1- 0, 94.4) 518 H Middletown ( 1- 1, 93.1) 520 A Mount Hope ( 3- 1, 97.1)

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   326 A Bishop Hendricken       8- 5       3     4          -0.59
   331 H Pilgrim                 6- 3       3     2           0.71
   401 A Toll Gate              19- 1      18    10           0.00

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

Portsmouth Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Barrington Portsmouth tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Portsmouth
Bishop Hendricken Portsmouth Portsmouth  
Burrillville Portsmouth   Portsmouth
Chariho Portsmouth   Portsmouth
Classical Portsmouth   Portsmouth
Coventry Portsmouth   Portsmouth
Cranston East Portsmouth   Portsmouth
Cranston West Portsmouth   Portsmouth
Cumberland Portsmouth insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Portsmouth
East Greenwich Portsmouth   Portsmouth
East Providence Portsmouth   Portsmouth
La Salle Academy Portsmouth   Portsmouth
Lincoln Portsmouth   Portsmouth
Middletown Portsmouth   Portsmouth
Moses Brown School Portsmouth   Portsmouth
Mount Hope Portsmouth   Portsmouth
Narragansett Portsmouth tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Portsmouth
North Kingstown Portsmouth   Portsmouth
North Providence Portsmouth   Portsmouth
North Smithfield Portsmouth   Portsmouth
Pilgrim Portsmouth Portsmouth  
Ponaganset Portsmouth   Portsmouth
Prout/Exeter-West Gr Portsmouth   Portsmouth
Providence CDS-St Ra Portsmouth   Portsmouth
Rogers Portsmouth   Portsmouth
Scituate Portsmouth insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Portsmouth
Smithfield Portsmouth Portsmouth   2- 0 vs 0- 2
South Kingstown Portsmouth   Portsmouth
Tiverton Portsmouth   Portsmouth
Toll Gate Portsmouth Portsmouth  
Westerly Portsmouth   Portsmouth

PowerWise = 31


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 2.00

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 A Bishop Hendric  ( 1- 2, 95.3)     8- 5       -4.59       8.18       1.00         0.67             6.12
   0 H Pilgrim         ( 3- 1, 98.6)     6- 3       -1.29      11.48      -1.00         0.67             6.99
   0 A Toll Gate       ( 0- 2, 89.2)    19- 1      -10.67       2.10       1.00         0.67             2.07
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                        15.17

winning pts = 15.1710 losing points = 0.0000

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------