UPDATED: 04-23-26 10:35 PDT

boys Pelham 1
  
Pelham                
W-L: ( 2- 2) PR = 90.0389

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 413 H Trinity Manchester ( 1- 3, 89.4) 13-14 415 H Coe-Brown ( 5- 0, 98.7) 2-16 417 H Kearsarge ( 1- 4, 85.8) 13- 8 420 H Milford ( 1- 3, 85.9) 14- 2 423 A Trinity Manchester ( 1- 3, 89.4) 424 H Campbell ( 2- 3, 91.4) 504 A Lebanon ( 1- 1, 93.8) 508 H Laconia ( 3- 2, 92.2) 511 A Kennett ( 2- 1, 90.2) 513 A Gilford ( 2- 2, 91.2) 515 H Plymouth Regional ( 4- 1, 95.8) 518 A ConVal ( 2- 1, 92.2) 520 A Bow ( 4- 0, 93.7) 526 A John Stark ( 1- 3, 90.4) 528 H Hopkinton ( 2- 2, 91.1)

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   413 H Trinity Manchester     13-14      -1     1          -1.73
   415 H Coe-Brown               2-16     -14    -9           0.00
   417 H Kearsarge              13- 8       5     4           0.68
   420 H Milford                14- 2      12     4           0.81

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

Pelham PairWisePlus Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Alvirne Pelham Pelham   1- 0 vs 0- 1
Bedford Bedford   Bedford
Bishop Brady Pelham   Pelham
Bishop Guertin Bishop Guertin   Bishop Guertin
Bow Bow Bow   2- 0 vs 1- 1
Campbell Campbell   Campbell
Coe-Brown Coe-Brown Coe-Brown  
Concord Pelham   Pelham
ConVal ConVal ConVal   1- 0 vs 0- 1
Derryfield Derryfield   Derryfield
Dover Dover   Dover
Exeter HS Exeter HS   Exeter HS
Gilford Gilford   Gilford
Goffstown Pelham   Pelham
Hanover Hanover   Hanover
Hollis-Brookline Hollis-Brookline   Hollis-Brookline
Hopkinton Hopkinton tied -  0- 1 Hopkinton
Inter-Lakes-Moultonb Inter-Lakes-Moultonb   Inter-Lakes-Moultonb
John Stark John Stark   John Stark
Kearsarge Pelham Pelham  
Keene-Monadnock Pelham   Pelham
Kennett Kennett Kennett   1- 0 vs 0- 1
Kingswood Kingswood   Kingswood
Laconia Laconia tied -  1- 1 Laconia
Lebanon Lebanon   Lebanon
Londonderry Londonderry   Londonderry
Manchester Memorial- Pelham   Pelham
Merrimack Merrimack   Merrimack
Merrimack Valley Pelham   Pelham
Milford Pelham Pelham  
Nashua North Pelham   Pelham
Nashua South Nashua South   Nashua South
Oyster River-Newmark Oyster River-Newmark   Oyster River-Newmark
Pembroke Academy Pelham   Pelham
Pinkerton Academy Pinkerton Academy   Pinkerton Academy
Plymouth Regional Plymouth Regional tied -  2- 1 Plymouth Regional
Portsmouth Portsmouth   Portsmouth
Salem Pelham   Pelham
Souhegan Souhegan   Souhegan
Spaulding Pelham   Pelham
St Thomas Aquinas Pelham   Pelham
Stevens Pelham Pelham   1- 0 vs 0- 1
Timberlane Timberlane   Timberlane
Trinity Manchester Trinity Manchester Trinity Manchester  
Windham Windham   Windham
Winnacunnet Winnacunnet   Winnacunnet

PairWisePlus = 15


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 3.83

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 H Trinity Manche  ( 1- 3, 89.4)    13-14      -10.54       8.19      -0.04         0.96           -10.14
   0 H Coe-Brown       ( 5- 0, 98.7)     2-16       -1.24      17.49      -0.04         0.96            -1.23
   0 H Kearsarge       ( 1- 4, 85.8)    13- 8      -14.14       4.59      -0.04         0.96             4.36
   0 H Milford         ( 1- 3, 85.9)    14- 2      -14.01       4.72      -0.04         0.96             4.48
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                        -2.54

winning pts = 8.8337 losing points = -11.3694

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------