UPDATED: 04-05-26 08:40 PDT

boys Porter-Gaud 1
  
Porter-Gaud           
W-L: ( 4- 0) PR = 89.8713

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 307 H Greenville ( 1- 8, 83.5) 18- 6 324 A Heathwood Hall ( 4- 3, 84.6) 13- 6 327 H Bishop England ( 7- 3, 86.2) 16- 9 330 A James Island Charter ( 7- 5, 86.2) 13-11 414 H Oceanside Academy ( 2- 1, 93.7) 417 H Hammond School ( 2- 4, 84.8) 423 H Laurence Manning Aca ( 8- 1, 84.4)

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   307 H Greenville             18- 6      12     7           0.00
   324 A Heathwood Hall         13- 6       7     5           0.28
   327 H Bishop England         16- 9       7     4           0.82
   330 A James Island Charter   13-11       2     3          -1.11

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

Porter-Gaud Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
AC Flora Porter-Gaud tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Porter-Gaud
Academic Magnet Char Porter-Gaud Porter-Gaud   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Aiken Porter-Gaud   Porter-Gaud
Atlantic Collegiate Porter-Gaud   Porter-Gaud
Beaufort Porter-Gaud Porter-Gaud   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Bishop England Porter-Gaud Porter-Gaud  
Bluffton Porter-Gaud insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Porter-Gaud
Blythewood Porter-Gaud tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Porter-Gaud
Boiling Springs Porter-Gaud   Porter-Gaud
Byrnes Porter-Gaud tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Porter-Gaud
Camden Military Acad Porter-Gaud   Porter-Gaud
Carolina Forest Porter-Gaud insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Porter-Gaud
Catawba Ridge Porter-Gaud   Porter-Gaud
Chapin Chapin tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Chapin
Christ Church Episco Porter-Gaud tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Porter-Gaud
Clover Clover   Clover
Dorman Dorman   Dorman
Dutch Fork Porter-Gaud   Porter-Gaud
Eastside Porter-Gaud tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Porter-Gaud
Fort Mill Porter-Gaud   Porter-Gaud
Fox Creek Porter-Gaud   Porter-Gaud
Gilbert Porter-Gaud   Porter-Gaud
Greenville Porter-Gaud Porter-Gaud  
Hammond School Porter-Gaud insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Porter-Gaud
Heathwood Hall Porter-Gaud Porter-Gaud  
Hillcrest Porter-Gaud   Porter-Gaud
Hilton Head Porter-Gaud insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Porter-Gaud
Hilton Head Christia Porter-Gaud   Porter-Gaud
James Island Charter Porter-Gaud Porter-Gaud  
JL Mann Academy Porter-Gaud   Porter-Gaud
Laurence Manning Aca Porter-Gaud insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Porter-Gaud
Legion Collegiate Ac Porter-Gaud   Porter-Gaud
Lexington Porter-Gaud   Porter-Gaud
Lucy Beckham Lucy Beckham tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) Lucy Beckham
Mauldin Porter-Gaud tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Porter-Gaud
May River Porter-Gaud insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Porter-Gaud
Myrtle Beach Porter-Gaud   Porter-Gaud
Nation Ford Porter-Gaud   Porter-Gaud
North Myrtle Beach Porter-Gaud   Porter-Gaud
Oceanside Academy Oceanside Academy   Oceanside Academy
Philip Simmons Porter-Gaud insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Porter-Gaud
River Bluff River Bluff   River Bluff
Riverside Porter-Gaud tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Porter-Gaud
Socastee Porter-Gaud insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Porter-Gaud
Spartanburg Porter-Gaud   Porter-Gaud
Spring Valley Porter-Gaud insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Porter-Gaud
St James Porter-Gaud   Porter-Gaud
St Joseph Catholic Porter-Gaud   Porter-Gaud
TL Hanna Porter-Gaud insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Porter-Gaud
Trinity Collegiate Porter-Gaud   Porter-Gaud
Waccamaw Porter-Gaud insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Porter-Gaud
Wade Hampton Porter-Gaud   Porter-Gaud
Wando Wando tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) Wando
Westside Porter-Gaud   Porter-Gaud
White Knoll Porter-Gaud insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Porter-Gaud
Woodmont Porter-Gaud   Porter-Gaud

PowerWise = 49


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 8.14

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 H Greenville      ( 1- 8, 83.5)    18- 6      -16.41      12.15      -0.55         2.04            23.60
   0 A Heathwood Hall  ( 4- 3, 84.6)    13- 6      -15.29      13.26       0.55         2.04            28.10
   0 H Bishop England  ( 7- 3, 86.2)    16- 9      -13.66      14.90      -0.55         2.04            29.20
   0 A James Island C  ( 7- 5, 86.2)    13-11      -13.68      14.87       0.55         2.04            31.38
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                       112.29

winning pts = 112.2886 losing points = 0.0000

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------