UPDATED: 04-05-26 08:40 PDT

boys Newberg 1
  
Newberg               
W-L: ( 1- 3) PR = 90.7894

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 317 H Grant/Central Eastsi ( 2- 1, 96.3) 2-13 319 H Roseburg ( 2- 1, 93.4) 11-13 331 A Sprague/South Salem ( 0- 3, 83.4) 22- 2 403 H Lake Oswego/Riverdal ( 3- 0, 94.9) 2- 4 407 A Glencoe ( 2- 1, 90.7) 410 H Westview ( 2- 1, 85.9) 414 H Liberty ( 3- 2, 91.6) 416 A Century ( 1- 2, 85.4) 418 A Mountain View ( 3- 0, 95.3) 419 A Bend/Caldera ( 1- 1, 94.4) 422 A Tualatin ( 0- 3, 89.1) 424 H Tigard ( 1- 3, 85.6) 428 A Wilsonville ( 3- 1, 93.6) 501 A Sherwood ( 1- 2, 90.2)

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   317 H Grant/Central Eastsi    2-13     -11    -5          -0.47
   319 H Roseburg               11-13      -2    -2          -0.36
   331 A Sprague/South Salem    22- 2      20     6           0.00
   403 H Lake Oswego/Riverdal    2- 4      -2    -3           1.11

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

Newberg Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Aloha/Southridge Newberg   Newberg
Beaverton Newberg tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Newberg
Bend/Caldera Bend/Caldera   Bend/Caldera
Burns Newberg   Newberg
Canby Newberg   Newberg
Central Catholic Newberg   Newberg
Century Newberg   Newberg
Clackamas/Nelson Newberg   Newberg
Corvallis Newberg   Newberg
Forest Grove Forest Grove   Forest Grove
Glencoe Newberg   Newberg
Grant/Central Eastsi Grant/Central Eastsi Grant/Central Eastsi  
Hillsboro Newberg tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Newberg
Hood River Hood River   Hood River
Ida B Wells Newberg   Newberg
Jesuit Portland Jesuit Portland   Jesuit Portland
Lake Oswego/Riverdal Lake Oswego/Riverdal Lake Oswego/Riverdal  
Lakeridge Lakeridge insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Lakeridge
Liberty Liberty   Liberty
Lincoln Lincoln tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Lincoln
Marist Marist tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Marist
Mountain View Mountain View insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Mountain View
Mountainside Newberg   Newberg
Oregon City Newberg   Newberg
Oregon Episcopal Newberg   Newberg
Ridgeview Newberg   Newberg
Roseburg Roseburg Roseburg  
Sheldon Newberg   Newberg
Sherwood Newberg   Newberg
South Eugene South Eugene   South Eugene
Sprague/South Salem Newberg Newberg  
Summit Summit   Summit
Sunset Sunset   Sunset
Thurston Newberg   Newberg
Tigard Newberg tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Newberg
Tualatin Newberg   Newberg
West Albany Newberg   Newberg
West Linn West Linn tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) West Linn
West Salem/McNary Newberg   Newberg
Westview Newberg   Newberg
Wilsonville Wilsonville   Wilsonville

PowerWise = 24


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 2.90

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 H Grant/Central   ( 2- 1, 96.3)     2-13       -3.58      14.64      -1.00         0.73            -3.33
   0 H Roseburg        ( 2- 1, 93.4)    11-13       -6.48      11.74      -1.00         0.73            -5.43
   0 A Sprague/South   ( 0- 3, 83.4)    22- 2      -16.52       1.70       1.00         0.73             1.96
   0 H Lake Oswego/Ri  ( 3- 0, 94.9)     2- 4       -5.00      13.22      -1.00         0.73            -4.36
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                       -11.15

winning pts = 1.9598 losing points = -13.1104

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------