UPDATED: 04-28-26 08:46 PDT

boys Neenah 1
  
Neenah                
W-L: ( 3- 2) PR = 92.7342

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 407 H Pulaski ( 0- 9, 77.9) 17- 1 411 A Middleton ( 7- 1, 98.1) 4-10 420 A Bay Port ( 6- 2, 88.6) 8- 5 423 H De Pere ( 4- 2, 90.1) 16- 3 425 H Hudson ( 4- 2, 96.5) 9-15 430 A Kimberly ( 4- 3, 89.8) 502 H Kettle Moraine ( 7- 0, 96.6) 504 A Mukwonago ( 3- 3, 99.9) 505 A Wausau ( 0- 3, 85.4) 514 H Notre Dame Green Ba ( 3- 6, 83.6) 516 A Oregon ( 3- 2, 93.3) 518 H Oneida Nation ( 1- 1, 87.3) 521 H Appleton ( 5- 2, 92.4)

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   407 H Pulaski                17- 1      16    15           0.00
   411 A Middleton               4-10      -6    -5           0.00
   420 A Bay Port                8- 5       3     4          -1.10
   423 H De Pere                16- 3      13     3    +      2.37
   425 H Hudson                  9-15      -6    -4          -1.21

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   423 H De Pere                16- 3      13     3    +      2.37

Neenah PairWisePlus Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Appleton Neenah   Neenah
Arrowhead Arrowhead   Arrowhead
Bay Port Neenah Neenah  
Brookfield Neenah Neenah   1- 0 vs 0- 1
Catholic Memorial Neenah   Neenah
Cedarburg Neenah   Neenah
De Pere Neenah Neenah  
DeForest Neenah Neenah   1- 0 vs 0- 1
Elkhorn Neenah   Neenah
Franklin Neenah   Neenah
Hamilton Neenah   Neenah
Homestead Neenah   Neenah
Hudson Hudson Hudson  
Janesville Neenah tied -  0- 1 Neenah
Kenosha Neenah   Neenah
Kettle Moraine Kettle Moraine   Kettle Moraine
Kimberly Neenah tied -  2- 1 Neenah
La Crosse Neenah   Neenah
Madison Madison Madison   1- 1 vs 0- 2
Marquette University Marquette University tied -  0- 1 Marquette University
Middleton Middleton Middleton  
Mukwonago Mukwonago   Mukwonago
Muskego Neenah   Neenah
Notre Dame Green Ba Neenah Neenah   2- 0 vs 1- 1
Oak Creek Neenah tied -  1- 0 Neenah
Oconomowoc Neenah Neenah   1- 0 vs 0- 1
Oneida Nation Neenah   Neenah
Oregon Oregon   Oregon
Pulaski Neenah Neenah  
Sauk Prairie Neenah   Neenah
Sun Prairie Neenah tied -  0- 1 Neenah
Superior Neenah tied -  0- 1 Neenah
University Milwauke Neenah   Neenah
Verona Verona tied -  0- 2 Verona
Waukesha Neenah   Neenah
Waunakee Waunakee Waunakee   1- 0 vs 0- 1
Wausau Neenah Neenah   1- 0 vs 0- 1
Wauwatosa Neenah   Neenah
West Bend Neenah Neenah   2- 0 vs 1- 1
Whitefish Bay Neenah   Neenah

PairWisePlus = 30


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 6.00

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 H Pulaski         ( 0- 9, 77.9)    17- 1      -21.99       3.04      -0.01         1.20             3.64
   0 A Middleton       ( 7- 1, 98.1)     4-10       -1.81      23.22       0.01         1.20            -2.16
   0 A Bay Port        ( 6- 2, 88.6)     8- 5      -11.27      13.75       0.01         1.20            16.52
   0 H De Pere         ( 4- 2, 90.1)    16- 3       -9.79      15.24      -0.01         1.20            18.28
   0 H Hudson          ( 4- 2, 96.5)     9-15       -3.37      21.66      -0.01         1.20            -4.05
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                        32.22

winning pts = 38.4332 losing points = -6.2138

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------