UPDATED: 04-07-26 18:12 PDT

boys Mount Hope 1
  
Mount Hope            
W-L: ( 3- 1) PR = 97.0819

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 326 A Middletown ( 1- 1, 93.1) 5- 2 327 A Cranston West ( 0- 1, 93.1) 13-10 403 H Westerly ( 1- 0, 99.1) 10-11 406 H North Smithfield ( 3- 1, 93.1) 14- 5 408 A Providence CDS-St Ra ( 1- 1, 95.5) 413 H Providence CDS-St Ra ( 1- 1, 95.5) 415 H Lincoln ( 3- 1, 97.5) 424 H Smithfield ( 0- 3, 89.1) 427 A Burrillville ( 2- 1, 93.5) 429 A Coventry ( 0- 2, 91.5) 505 H Coventry ( 0- 2, 91.5) 507 H Narragansett ( 3- 1, 93.1) 508 H Toll Gate ( 0- 2, 89.2) 512 A Lincoln ( 3- 1, 97.5) 518 A Narragansett ( 3- 1, 93.1) 520 H Portsmouth ( 3- 0, 99.9)

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   326 A Middletown              5- 2       3     3           0.02
   327 A Cranston West          13-10       3     3          -0.01
   403 H Westerly               10-11      -1    -1          -0.01
   406 H North Smithfield       14- 5       9     5           0.00

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

Mount Hope Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Barrington Mount Hope   Mount Hope
Bishop Hendricken Mount Hope   Mount Hope
Burrillville Mount Hope   Mount Hope
Chariho Mount Hope insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Mount Hope
Classical Mount Hope   Mount Hope
Coventry Mount Hope   Mount Hope
Cranston East Mount Hope   Mount Hope
Cranston West Mount Hope Mount Hope  
Cumberland Mount Hope   Mount Hope
East Greenwich Mount Hope   Mount Hope
East Providence Mount Hope   Mount Hope
La Salle Academy Mount Hope   Mount Hope
Lincoln Lincoln   Lincoln
Middletown Mount Hope Mount Hope  
Moses Brown School Moses Brown School   Moses Brown School
Narragansett Mount Hope   Mount Hope
North Kingstown Mount Hope   Mount Hope
North Providence Mount Hope insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Mount Hope
North Smithfield Mount Hope Mount Hope  
Pilgrim Pilgrim   Pilgrim
Ponaganset Mount Hope insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Mount Hope
Portsmouth Portsmouth   Portsmouth
Prout/Exeter-West Gr Mount Hope   Mount Hope
Providence CDS-St Ra Mount Hope   Mount Hope
Rogers Mount Hope   Mount Hope
Scituate Mount Hope   Mount Hope
Smithfield Mount Hope insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Mount Hope
South Kingstown Mount Hope   Mount Hope
Tiverton Mount Hope   Mount Hope
Toll Gate Mount Hope   Mount Hope
Westerly Westerly Westerly  

PowerWise = 26


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 2.00

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 A Middletown      ( 1- 1, 93.1)     5- 2       -6.80       5.97       1.00         0.50             3.49
   0 A Cranston West   ( 0- 1, 93.1)    13-10       -6.83       5.94       1.00         0.50             3.47
   0 H Westerly        ( 1- 0, 99.1)    10-11       -0.83      11.94      -1.00         0.50            -0.92
   0 H North Smithfie  ( 3- 1, 93.1)    14- 5       -6.82       5.94      -1.00         0.50             2.47
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                         8.52

winning pts = 9.4306 losing points = -0.9152

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------