UPDATED: 04-29-26 08:54 PDT

boys Meridian 1
  
Meridian              
W-L: ( 7- 0) PR = 91.9915

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 306 H Mountain View ( 4- 5, 91.6) 9- 8 324 H Boise ( 4- 5, 91.0) 7- 6 327 H Emmett ( 2- 5, 85.6) 18- 2 331 H Vallivue ( 1- 6, 86.2) 18- 7 403 A Kuna ( 3- 5, 89.1) 18-12 408 H Borah/Capital ( 4- 3, 88.1) 16- 3 421 H Eagle ( 2- 6, 88.9) 12-11 424 H Owyhee ( 1- 2, 85.7) 430 A Middleton ( 1- 5, 84.2)

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   306 H Mountain View           9- 8       1     1           0.06
   324 H Boise                   7- 6       1     2          -0.61
   327 H Emmett                 18- 2      16     7           0.00
   331 H Vallivue               18- 7      11     6           0.00
   403 A Kuna                   18-12       6     2    +      2.70
   408 H Borah/Capital          16- 3      13     4           0.55
   421 H Eagle                  12-11       1     4    -     -2.70

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   421 H Eagle                  12-11       1     4    -     -2.70

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   403 A Kuna                   18-12       6     2    +      2.70

Meridian PairWisePlus Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Ammon Meridian   Meridian
Bishop Kelly Bishop Kelly tied -  5- 0 Bishop Kelly
Boise Meridian Meridian  
Borah/Capital Meridian Meridian  
Centennial Meridian   Meridian
Chesterton of Notre Meridian   Meridian
Coeur d'Alene Coeur d'Alene   Coeur d'Alene
Eagle Meridian Meridian  
Emmett Meridian Meridian  
Idaho Falls Meridian   Meridian
Immaculate Conceptio Meridian   Meridian
Jackson Hole Meridian Meridian   2- 0 vs 1- 1
Kuna Meridian Meridian  
Lake City Lake City   Lake City
Logos Meridian   Meridian
Magic Valley Meridian   Meridian
Middleton Meridian Meridian   4- 0 vs 0- 4
Mountain View Meridian Meridian  
Owyhee Meridian Meridian   3- 0 vs 1- 2
Pocatello Meridian   Meridian
Rocky Mountain Rocky Mountain tied -  4- 0 Rocky Mountain
Sandpoint Meridian   Meridian
Spokane Meridian   Meridian
Spokane Valley Spokane Valley   Spokane Valley
Sun Valley Meridian   Meridian
Teton Valley Meridian   Meridian
Timberline Timberline tied -  3- 0 Timberline
Vallivue Meridian Meridian  
Gonzaga Prep Gonzaga Prep   Gonzaga Prep
Lewis & Clark Lewis & Clark   Lewis & Clark
Mead Meridian   Meridian
Mount Spokane Mount Spokane   Mount Spokane

PairWisePlus = 23


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 5.21

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 H Mountain View   ( 4- 5, 91.6)     9- 8       -8.26      11.51      -0.58         0.74             8.13
   0 H Boise           ( 4- 5, 91.0)     7- 6       -8.93      10.84      -0.58         0.74             7.63
   0 H Emmett          ( 2- 5, 85.6)    18- 2      -14.29       5.48      -0.58         0.74             3.65
   0 H Vallivue        ( 1- 6, 86.2)    18- 7      -13.69       6.08      -0.58         0.74             4.09
   0 A Kuna            ( 3- 5, 89.1)    18-12      -10.79       8.97       0.58         0.74             7.12
   0 H Borah/Capital   ( 4- 3, 88.1)    16- 3      -11.78       7.99      -0.58         0.74             5.51
   0 H Eagle           ( 2- 6, 88.9)    12-11      -11.02       8.75      -0.58         0.74             6.08
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                        42.22

winning pts = 42.2150 losing points = 0.0000

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------