UPDATED: 04-04-26 09:07 PDT

boys Meridian 1
  
Meridian              
W-L: ( 5- 0) PR = 96.6292

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 306 H Mountain View ( 2- 4, 95.3) 9- 8 324 H Boise ( 3- 2, 95.0) 7- 6 327 H Emmett ( 1- 2, 83.9) 18- 2 331 H Vallivue ( 1- 4, 89.4) 18- 7 403 A Kuna ( 1- 3, 92.6) 18-12 408 H Borah/Capital ( 3- 1, 92.6) 421 H Eagle ( 1- 3, 91.4) 424 H Owyhee ( 1- 2, 88.0) 430 A Middleton ( 0- 2, 82.3)

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   306 H Mountain View           9- 8       1     1          -0.30
   324 H Boise                   7- 6       1     2          -0.60
   327 H Emmett                 18- 2      16    13           0.00
   331 H Vallivue               18- 7      11     7           0.00
   403 A Kuna                   18-12       6     4           0.95

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

Meridian Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Ammon Meridian   Meridian
Bishop Kelly Bishop Kelly tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Bishop Kelly
Boise Meridian Meridian  
Borah/Capital Meridian insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Meridian
Centennial Meridian   Meridian
Chesterton of Notre Meridian   Meridian
Coeur d'Alene Meridian   Meridian
Eagle Meridian insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Meridian
Emmett Meridian Meridian  
Idaho Falls Meridian   Meridian
Immaculate Conceptio Meridian   Meridian
Jackson Hole Meridian insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Meridian
Kuna Meridian Meridian  
Lake City Meridian   Meridian
Logos Meridian   Meridian
Magic Valley Meridian   Meridian
Middleton Meridian insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Meridian
Mountain View Meridian Meridian  
Owyhee Meridian insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Meridian
Pocatello Meridian   Meridian
Rocky Mountain Rocky Mountain   Rocky Mountain
Sandpoint Meridian   Meridian
Spokane Meridian   Meridian
Spokane Valley Meridian   Meridian
Sun Valley Meridian   Meridian
Teton Valley Meridian   Meridian
Timberline Timberline tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) Timberline
Vallivue Meridian Meridian  
Gonzaga Prep Meridian   Meridian
Lewis & Clark Meridian   Meridian
Mead Meridian   Meridian
Mount Spokane Meridian   Meridian

PowerWise = 29


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 2.48

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 H Mountain View   ( 2- 4, 95.3)     9- 8       -4.56      13.02      -0.01         0.50             6.46
   0 H Boise           ( 3- 2, 95.0)     7- 6       -4.86      12.72      -0.01         0.50             6.32
   0 H Emmett          ( 1- 2, 83.9)    18- 2      -16.05       1.53      -0.01         0.50             0.75
   0 H Vallivue        ( 1- 4, 89.4)    18- 7      -10.48       7.09      -0.01         0.50             3.52
   0 A Kuna            ( 1- 3, 92.6)    18-12       -7.33      10.25       0.01         0.50             5.10
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                        22.15

winning pts = 22.1496 losing points = 0.0000

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------