UPDATED: 05-01-26 10:12 PDT

boys Middletown 1
  
Middletown            
W-L: ( 3- 2) PR = 88.0467

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 326 H Mount Hope ( 9- 1, 91.4) 2- 5 331 H Smithfield ( 0-11, 85.4) 7- 2 407 H Prout/Exeter-West Gr ( 2- 6, 87.6) 8- 5 417 A South Kingstown ( 5- 5, 90.1) 3-15 421 A Smithfield ( 0-11, 85.4) 6- 5 430 A Westerly ( 4- 2, 91.7) 505 H Cranston West ( 0- 6, 87.5) 508 H Portsmouth ( 9- 2, 94.0) 512 A East Greenwich ( 5- 0, 94.4) 515 H Westerly ( 4- 2, 91.7) 518 A Portsmouth ( 9- 2, 94.0)

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   326 H Mount Hope              2- 5      -3    -3          -0.30
   331 H Smithfield              7- 2       5     3           1.70
   407 H Prout/Exeter-West Gr    8- 5       3     1           1.91
   417 A South Kingstown         3-15     -12    -3    -     -2.26
   421 A Smithfield              6- 5       1     2          -0.94

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   417 A South Kingstown         3-15     -12    -3    -     -2.26

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

Middletown PairWisePlus Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Barrington Barrington tied -  1- 0 Barrington
Bishop Hendricken Bishop Hendricken Bishop Hendricken   2- 0 vs 1- 1
Burrillville Middletown tied -  0- 1 Middletown
Chariho Middletown tied -  0- 1 Middletown
Classical Classical   Classical
Coventry Middletown tied -  0- 1 Middletown
Cranston East Middletown   Middletown
Cranston West Middletown tied -  0- 1 Middletown
Cumberland Cumberland tied -  1- 1 Cumberland
East Greenwich East Greenwich East Greenwich   2- 0 vs 1- 1
East Providence East Providence   East Providence
La Salle Academy La Salle Academy   La Salle Academy
Lincoln Middletown tied -  0- 1 Middletown
Moses Brown School Moses Brown School Moses Brown School   1- 0 vs 0- 1
Mount Hope Mount Hope Mount Hope  
Narragansett Narragansett tied -  1- 0 Narragansett
North Kingstown North Kingstown tied -  1- 0 North Kingstown
North Providence Middletown   Middletown
North Smithfield Middletown tied -  0- 1 Middletown
Pilgrim Pilgrim Pilgrim   3- 0 vs 2- 1
Ponaganset Middletown   Middletown
Portsmouth Portsmouth tied -  2- 0 Portsmouth
Prout/Exeter-West Gr Middletown Middletown  
Providence CDS-St Ra Middletown tied -  0- 1 Middletown
Rogers Middletown   Middletown
Scituate Scituate   Scituate
Smithfield Middletown Middletown  
South Kingstown South Kingstown South Kingstown  
Tiverton Middletown   Middletown
Toll Gate Middletown   Middletown
Westerly Westerly Westerly   2- 1 vs 1- 2

PairWisePlus = 15


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 6.44

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 H Mount Hope      ( 9- 1, 91.4)     2- 5       -8.47      18.69      -0.68         1.29           -11.78
   0 H Smithfield      ( 0-11, 85.4)     7- 2      -14.47      12.69      -0.68         1.29            15.46
   0 H Prout/Exeter-W  ( 2- 6, 87.6)     8- 5      -12.27      14.89      -0.68         1.29            18.30
   0 A South Kingstow  ( 5- 5, 90.1)     3-15       -9.79      17.36       0.68         1.29           -11.74
   0 A Smithfield      ( 0-11, 85.4)     6- 5      -14.47      12.69       0.68         1.29            17.21
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                        27.45

winning pts = 50.9663 losing points = -23.5179

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------