UPDATED: 04-23-26 10:35 PDT

boys Lebanon 1
  
Lebanon               
W-L: ( 1- 1) PR = 93.7827

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 416 H Campbell ( 2- 3, 91.4) 17- 7 417 A Laconia ( 3- 2, 92.2) 9-10 504 H Pelham ( 2- 2, 90.0) 506 H Kearsarge ( 1- 4, 85.8) 508 H John Stark ( 1- 3, 90.4) 511 H Plymouth Regional ( 4- 1, 95.8) 512 A Bow ( 4- 0, 93.7) 515 A ConVal ( 2- 1, 92.2) 518 A Kennett ( 2- 1, 90.2) 520 A Trinity Manchester ( 1- 3, 89.4) 522 H Milford ( 1- 3, 85.9) 525 H Bishop Brady ( 1- 2, 89.5) 527 A Stevens ( 0- 3, 81.2)

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   416 H Campbell               17- 7      10     2    +      2.59
   417 A Laconia                 9-10      -1     2    -     -2.57

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   417 A Laconia                 9-10      -1     2    -     -2.57

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   416 H Campbell               17- 7      10     2    +      2.59

Lebanon PairWisePlus Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Alvirne Lebanon   Lebanon
Bedford Bedford   Bedford
Bishop Brady Lebanon   Lebanon
Bishop Guertin Bishop Guertin   Bishop Guertin
Bow Lebanon   Lebanon
Campbell Lebanon Lebanon  
Coe-Brown Coe-Brown Coe-Brown   1- 0 vs 0- 1
Concord Lebanon   Lebanon
ConVal Lebanon   Lebanon
Derryfield Derryfield   Derryfield
Dover Dover   Dover
Exeter HS Exeter HS   Exeter HS
Gilford Lebanon   Lebanon
Goffstown Lebanon   Lebanon
Hanover Lebanon   Lebanon
Hollis-Brookline Lebanon   Lebanon
Hopkinton Lebanon Lebanon   1- 0 vs 0- 1
Inter-Lakes-Moultonb Lebanon   Lebanon
John Stark Lebanon tied -  0- 1 Lebanon
Kearsarge Lebanon tied -  0- 1 Lebanon
Keene-Monadnock Lebanon   Lebanon
Kennett Lebanon   Lebanon
Kingswood Lebanon   Lebanon
Laconia Laconia Laconia  
Londonderry Lebanon   Lebanon
Manchester Memorial- Lebanon   Lebanon
Merrimack Merrimack   Merrimack
Merrimack Valley Lebanon   Lebanon
Milford Lebanon   Lebanon
Nashua North Lebanon   Lebanon
Nashua South Lebanon   Lebanon
Oyster River-Newmark Lebanon   Lebanon
Pelham Lebanon   Lebanon
Pembroke Academy Lebanon   Lebanon
Pinkerton Academy Pinkerton Academy   Pinkerton Academy
Plymouth Regional Plymouth Regional tied -  1- 0 Plymouth Regional
Portsmouth Portsmouth   Portsmouth
Salem Lebanon   Lebanon
Souhegan Lebanon tied -  1- 0 Lebanon
Spaulding Lebanon   Lebanon
St Thomas Aquinas Lebanon   Lebanon
Stevens Lebanon   Lebanon
Timberlane Timberlane   Timberlane
Trinity Manchester Lebanon   Lebanon
Windham Lebanon   Lebanon
Winnacunnet Winnacunnet   Winnacunnet

PairWisePlus = 33


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 3.83

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 H Campbell        ( 2- 3, 91.4)    17- 7       -8.48      10.25      -0.04         1.91            19.54
   0 A Laconia         ( 3- 2, 92.2)     9-10       -7.73      11.00       0.04         1.91           -14.71
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                         4.83

winning pts = 19.5384 losing points = -14.7130

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------