UPDATED: 04-23-26 10:35 PDT

boys Laconia 1
  
Laconia               
W-L: ( 3- 2) PR = 92.1721

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 413 A Kearsarge ( 1- 4, 85.8) 12- 5 415 H John Stark ( 1- 3, 90.4) 6- 5 417 H Lebanon ( 1- 1, 93.8) 10- 9 420 A Campbell ( 2- 3, 91.4) 4- 5 422 H Coe-Brown ( 5- 0, 98.7) 4-14 424 H Kennett ( 2- 1, 90.2) 506 H Plymouth Regional ( 4- 1, 95.8) 508 A Pelham ( 2- 2, 90.0) 511 H ConVal ( 2- 1, 92.2) 513 A Plymouth Regional ( 4- 1, 95.8) 514 A Milford ( 1- 3, 85.9) 518 H Bow ( 4- 0, 93.7) 526 A Hopkinton ( 2- 2, 91.1) 528 H Gilford ( 2- 2, 91.2)

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   413 A Kearsarge              12- 5       7     6           0.00
   415 H John Stark              6- 5       1     2          -0.84
   417 H Lebanon                10- 9       1    -2    +      2.57
   420 A Campbell                4- 5      -1     1          -1.71
   422 H Coe-Brown               4-14     -10    -6           0.00

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   417 H Lebanon                10- 9       1    -2    +      2.57

Laconia PairWisePlus Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Alvirne Laconia   Laconia
Bedford Bedford   Bedford
Bishop Brady Laconia   Laconia
Bishop Guertin Bishop Guertin   Bishop Guertin
Bow Bow tied -  2- 0 Bow
Campbell Campbell Campbell  
Coe-Brown Coe-Brown Coe-Brown  
Concord Laconia   Laconia
ConVal ConVal   ConVal
Derryfield Derryfield   Derryfield
Dover Dover   Dover
Exeter HS Exeter HS   Exeter HS
Gilford Laconia tied -  1- 0 Laconia
Goffstown Laconia   Laconia
Hanover Laconia   Laconia
Hollis-Brookline Laconia   Laconia
Hopkinton Laconia tied -  0- 2 Laconia
Inter-Lakes-Moultonb Laconia   Laconia
John Stark Laconia Laconia  
Kearsarge Laconia Laconia  
Keene-Monadnock Laconia   Laconia
Kennett Laconia   Laconia
Kingswood Laconia   Laconia
Lebanon Laconia Laconia  
Londonderry Laconia   Laconia
Manchester Memorial- Laconia   Laconia
Merrimack Merrimack   Merrimack
Merrimack Valley Laconia   Laconia
Milford Laconia tied -  0- 1 Laconia
Nashua North Laconia   Laconia
Nashua South Nashua South   Nashua South
Oyster River-Newmark Laconia   Laconia
Pelham Laconia tied -  1- 1 Laconia
Pembroke Academy Laconia   Laconia
Pinkerton Academy Pinkerton Academy   Pinkerton Academy
Plymouth Regional Plymouth Regional Plymouth Regional   2- 1 vs 1- 2
Portsmouth Portsmouth   Portsmouth
Salem Laconia   Laconia
Souhegan Souhegan Souhegan   1- 0 vs 0- 1
Spaulding Laconia   Laconia
St Thomas Aquinas Laconia   Laconia
Stevens Laconia Laconia   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Timberlane Timberlane   Timberlane
Trinity Manchester Laconia   Laconia
Windham Windham   Windham
Winnacunnet Winnacunnet   Winnacunnet

PairWisePlus = 28


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 3.83

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 A Kearsarge       ( 1- 4, 85.8)    12- 5      -14.14       4.59       0.04         0.77             3.55
   0 H John Stark      ( 1- 3, 90.4)     6- 5       -9.53       9.20      -0.04         0.77             7.02
   0 H Lebanon         ( 1- 1, 93.8)    10- 9       -6.12      12.61      -0.04         0.77             9.63
   0 A Campbell        ( 2- 3, 91.4)     4- 5       -8.48      10.25       0.04         0.77            -6.46
   0 H Coe-Brown       ( 5- 0, 98.7)     4-14       -1.24      17.49      -0.04         0.77            -0.99
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                        12.75

winning pts = 20.1943 losing points = -7.4477

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------