Kimberly
W-L: (11- 6) PR = 92.5650Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 328 H Madison (12- 2, 98.0) 2- 8 330 A Marquette University (12- 5, 93.4) 5-10 409 A Pulaski ( 0-17, 79.3) 18- 2 411 A Mukwonago ( 8- 5, 97.6) 1- 0 416 A De Pere (10- 5, 91.6) 7- 6 420 H Wausau ( 3- 9, 85.6) 15- 4 424 H Hudson ( 4- 2, 97.5) 5-15 430 H Neenah ( 9- 4, 94.5) 4- 5 502 N Franklin ( 8- 9, 89.1) 7- 6 502 A Verona ( 9- 5, 95.5) 2- 9 505 A Notre Dame Green Ba ( 5-11, 86.6) 16- 2 507 A Appleton (10- 4, 92.7) 4- 6 509 A Waukesha ( 7- 6, 91.4) 13- 8 512 H Oneida Nation ( 2- 8, 86.1) 10- 3 516 H Janesville ( 6-10, 90.6) 6- 2 519 H DeForest ( 3-13, 89.1) 17- 6 521 H Bay Port (10- 6, 89.9) 15- 5
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
328 H Madison 2- 8 -6 -5 0.00
330 A Marquette University 5-10 -5 -1 - -3.95
409 A Pulaski 18- 2 16 13 0.00
416 A De Pere 7- 6 1 1 0.20
420 H Wausau 15- 4 11 7 0.00
424 H Hudson 5-15 -10 -5 -0.24
430 H Neenah 4- 5 -1 -2 0.74
502 N Franklin 7- 6 1 4 - -2.50
502 A Verona 2- 9 -7 -3 -1.86
505 A Notre Dame Green Ba 16- 2 14 6 0.00
507 A Appleton 4- 6 -2 0 -1.71
509 A Waukesha 13- 8 5 1 + 4.00
512 H Oneida Nation 10- 3 7 7 0.00
516 H Janesville 6- 2 4 2 1.86
519 H DeForest 17- 6 11 4 1.33
521 H Bay Port 15- 5 10 3 + 2.14
|
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 330 A Marquette University 5-10 -5 -1 - -3.95 502 N Franklin 7- 6 1 4 - -2.50 |
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 509 A Waukesha 13- 8 5 1 + 4.00 521 H Bay Port 15- 5 10 3 + 2.14 |
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Appleton | Appleton | Appleton | ||
| Arrowhead | Kimberly | Kimberly 4- 1 vs 3- 2 | ||
| Bay Port | Kimberly | Kimberly | ||
| Brookfield | Kimberly | Kimberly 3- 1 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Catholic Memorial | Kimberly | Kimberly 3- 1 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Cedarburg | Kimberly | tied - 0- 1 | Kimberly | |
| De Pere | Kimberly | Kimberly | ||
| DeForest | Kimberly | Kimberly | ||
| Elkhorn | Kimberly | Kimberly 3- 1 vs 1- 3 | ||
| Franklin | Kimberly | Kimberly | ||
| Hamilton | Kimberly | Kimberly 3- 1 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Homestead | Homestead | tied - 2- 2 | Homestead | |
| Hudson | Hudson | Hudson | ||
| Janesville | Kimberly | Kimberly | ||
| Kenosha | Kimberly | Kimberly 2- 2 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Kettle Moraine | Kettle Moraine | Kettle Moraine 5- 1 vs 3- 3 | ||
| La Crosse | Kimberly | Kimberly 2- 2 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Madison | Madison | Madison | ||
| Marquette University | Marquette University | Marquette University | ||
| Middleton | Middleton | Middleton 9- 0 vs 3- 6 | ||
| Mukwonago | Kimberly | Kimberly | ||
| Muskego | Kimberly | Kimberly 4- 0 vs 3- 1 | ||
| Neenah | Neenah | Neenah | ||
| Notre Dame Green Ba | Kimberly | Kimberly | ||
| Oak Creek | Kimberly | Kimberly 2- 1 vs 1- 2 | ||
| Oconomowoc | Kimberly | Kimberly 6- 0 vs 2- 4 | ||
| Oneida Nation | Kimberly | Kimberly | ||
| Oregon | Oregon | Oregon 4- 3 vs 3- 4 | ||
| Pulaski | Kimberly | Kimberly | ||
| Sauk Prairie | Kimberly | Kimberly 3- 2 vs 2- 3 | ||
| Sun Prairie | Kimberly | Kimberly 5- 2 vs 3- 4 | ||
| Superior | Kimberly | tied - 3- 1 | Kimberly | |
| University Milwauke | Kimberly | tied - 3- 2 | Kimberly | |
| Verona | Verona | Verona | ||
| Waukesha | Kimberly | Kimberly | ||
| Waunakee | Waunakee | Waunakee 7- 0 vs 4- 3 | ||
| Wausau | Kimberly | Kimberly | ||
| Wauwatosa | Kimberly | Kimberly 3- 1 vs 2- 2 | ||
| West Bend | Kimberly | Kimberly 3- 1 vs 2- 2 | ||
| Whitefish Bay | Kimberly | Kimberly 2- 0 vs 1- 1 |
division Games Only
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H Madison (12- 2, 98.0) 2- 8 -1.90 18.71 -0.19 0.84 -1.75
0 A Marquette Univ (12- 5, 93.4) 5-10 -6.47 14.15 0.19 0.84 -5.27
0 A Pulaski ( 0-17, 79.3) 18- 2 -20.62 1.00 0.19 0.84 0.99
0 A Mukwonago ( 8- 5, 97.6) 1- 0 -2.31 18.31 0.19 0.84 15.50
0 A De Pere (10- 5, 91.6) 7- 6 -8.33 12.29 0.19 0.84 10.46
0 H Wausau ( 3- 9, 85.6) 15- 4 -14.30 6.32 -0.19 0.84 5.14
0 H Hudson ( 4- 2, 97.5) 5-15 -2.39 18.23 -0.19 0.84 -2.16
0 H Neenah ( 9- 4, 94.5) 4- 5 -5.41 15.21 -0.19 0.84 -4.69
0 N Franklin ( 8- 9, 89.1) 7- 6 -10.84 9.78 -0.00 0.84 8.19
0 A Verona ( 9- 5, 95.5) 2- 9 -4.38 16.23 0.19 0.84 -3.52
0 A Notre Dame Gr ( 5-11, 86.6) 16- 2 -13.29 7.32 0.19 0.84 6.29
0 A Appleton (10- 4, 92.7) 4- 6 -7.23 13.39 0.19 0.84 -5.90
0 A Waukesha ( 7- 6, 91.4) 13- 8 -8.52 12.09 0.19 0.84 10.29
0 H Oneida Nation ( 2- 8, 86.1) 10- 3 -13.82 6.79 -0.19 0.84 5.53
0 H Janesville ( 6-10, 90.6) 6- 2 -9.29 11.33 -0.19 0.84 9.33
0 H DeForest ( 3-13, 89.1) 17- 6 -10.82 9.80 -0.19 0.84 8.05
0 H Bay Port (10- 6, 89.9) 15- 5 -10.01 10.61 -0.19 0.84 8.73
------
65.23
|